Personal protective equipment guidance during a global pandemic: A statistical analysis of National perceived confidence, knowledge and educational deficits amongst UK-based doctors.
Journal
International journal of clinical practice
ISSN: 1742-1241
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pract
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9712381
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2021
May 2021
Historique:
revised:
08
01
2021
received:
30
11
2020
accepted:
13
01
2021
pubmed:
20
1
2021
medline:
27
4
2021
entrez:
19
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
On the 11th of March 2020, the World Health Organisation (WHO) declared a global pandemic following the upsurge of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Unprecedented global demand for personal protective equipment (PPE) resulted in restricted availability, as well as evolving guidance on use, the latter of which was complicated by conflicting guidance provided by numerous healthcare bodies. To assess perceived confidence and knowledge of PPE guidance as published by Public Health England (PHE) amongst doctors of varying specialties and grades. A nationwide 11-point survey comprising of multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and a 5-point Likert scale assessing perceived confidence was disseminated to UK-based doctors using multiple platforms. Statistical analysis using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey's honest significant difference (Tukey HSD) and Pearson's chi-squared test was undertaken to assess for statistical significance. Data collated from 697 respondents revealed that average perceived confidence was low across all specialties and grades. Notably, 59% (n = 411) felt they had received insufficient education regarding up-to-date guidance, with 81% (n = 565) advocating further training. Anaesthetics and ophthalmology were highest and lowest scoring specialties in knowledge-based MCQs, achieving scores of 59% and 31%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences between specialty, but not grade. Ensuring uniformity in published guidance, coupled with education may aid knowledge and subsequent confidence regarding the appropriate use of PPE. The absence of a unified consensus and sustained training not only poses significant ramifications for patient and healthcare professional (HCP) safety, but also risks further depletion of already sparse resources. Because of the novelty of COVID-19, appropriate PPE is continually evolving leaving an absence in formal training and education. This paper reveals insight into confidence and knowledge of PPE amongst doctors of various specialities/grades during a global pandemic, highlighting key deficits in education and training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33465833
doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14029
pmc: PMC7994994
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14029Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
World J Surg. 2020 Sep;44(9):2842-2847
pubmed: 32564140
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 01;7:CD011621
pubmed: 31259389
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207
pubmed: 31995857
BMJ. 2020 Jun 10;369:m2195
pubmed: 32522737
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2020;47:e20202701
pubmed: 32844915
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2018 Dec 22;7:157
pubmed: 30607244
Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):e194
pubmed: 32367551
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12128
pubmed: 32515882
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Oct 11;63(8):930-936
pubmed: 31504129
J Hosp Infect. 2020 May;105(1):100-101
pubmed: 32147406
Turk J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 17;50(SI-1):578-584
pubmed: 32299205
Am J Infect Control. 2018 Dec;46(12):1329-1334
pubmed: 30029796
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 May;75(5):e14029
pubmed: 33465833
Can J Anaesth. 2020 May;67(5):568-576
pubmed: 32052373
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35797
pubmed: 22563403
N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1564-1567
pubmed: 32182409
Br J Surg. 2020 Jun;107(7):e196
pubmed: 32386064