Endometrial Status in Queens Evaluated by Histopathology Findings and Two Cytological Techniques: Low-Volume Uterine Lavage and Uterine Swabbing.

cytology polymorphonuclear neutrophil queen uterus

Journal

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
ISSN: 2076-2615
Titre abrégé: Animals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101635614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 04 12 2020
revised: 21 12 2020
accepted: 30 12 2020
entrez: 20 1 2021
pubmed: 21 1 2021
medline: 21 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Endometritis is associated with fertility problems in many species, with endometrial biopsy being the main diagnostic tool. In feline queens, the reduced size of the uterus may make it difficult to obtain representative diagnostic samples. Endometrial cytology may represent a valuable diagnostic tool for evaluating the health status of the endometrium in queens. Fifty domestic shorthair queens were included and divided into two cytological diagnostic technique groups, the uterine lavage (UL; n = 28) and uterine swabbing (US; n = 22) groups. Cytological results were compared with histopathological and bacteriological information. Changes in the histopathological patterns were also evaluated and compared with progesterone levels to confirm previous published data. Furthermore, the results from both cytological sampling methods were compared to evaluate the utility of each method. Endometritis was ruled out in all queens by means of histology and microbiology. Leukocyte counts and red blood cell/endometrial cell ratios were significantly higher in US than UL samples. Additionally, UL sampling is less affected by blood contamination and cells are better preserved. The combination of endometrial cytology and uterine culture might be useful for evaluating the endometrial characteristics in queens. The UL evaluation method is more representative of the actual endometrial status than the US technique.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33466439
pii: ani11010088
doi: 10.3390/ani11010088
pmc: PMC7824869
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Theriogenology. 2004 Jul;62(1-2):9-23
pubmed: 15159097
J Endocrinol. 1973 Jan;56(1):133-44
pubmed: 4683406
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019 May;45(5):951-960
pubmed: 30843321
J Small Anim Pract. 1998 Jan;39(1):2-9
pubmed: 9494927
Biol Reprod. 1983 Apr;28(3):657-71
pubmed: 6850043
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2014 Jan 15;244(2):180-6
pubmed: 24378027
Theriogenology. 2019 Jan 1;123:1-10
pubmed: 30253251
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Sep;44 Suppl 3:1-9
pubmed: 19660075
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014 Apr 04;12:27
pubmed: 24708825
Theriogenology. 2012 Jan 1;77(1):89-98
pubmed: 21855980
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Sep;44 Suppl 3:10-22
pubmed: 19660076
Theriogenology. 2012 Dec;78(9):1939-47
pubmed: 23110950
Theriogenology. 2005 Jul 1;64(1):12-29
pubmed: 15935839
Theriogenology. 2019 Jul 1;132:106-112
pubmed: 31004876
J Reprod Fertil. 1999 May;116(1):167-75
pubmed: 10505067
Theriogenology. 2005 Aug;64(3):510-8
pubmed: 15978661
Theriogenology. 2020 Dec;158:339-345
pubmed: 33038819
Can Vet J. 2005 Mar;46(3):255-9
pubmed: 15884649
Theriogenology. 2006 May;65(8):1516-30
pubmed: 16226305
Theriogenology. 2019 Jun;131:153-161
pubmed: 30974392
Biol Reprod. 1981 Apr;24(3):643-8
pubmed: 7236823
J Endocrinol. 1971 Feb;49(2):243-52
pubmed: 5091234
Reprod Domest Anim. 2002 Oct;37(5):261-8
pubmed: 12354177
Biol Reprod. 1981 Aug;25(1):15-28
pubmed: 7197173
Theriogenology. 2017 May;94:21-30
pubmed: 28407857
J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1987;35:305-9
pubmed: 3479585
Theriogenology. 2011 Jun;75(9):1567-81
pubmed: 21356552
J Endocrinol. 1969 Nov;45(3):441-7
pubmed: 5390861
Biol Reprod. 2011 May;84(5):872-85
pubmed: 21209420
J Feline Med Surg. 2008 Dec;10(6):566-76
pubmed: 18602323
Theriogenology. 2008 Apr 1;69(6):714-23
pubmed: 18242670
Reprod Domest Anim. 2009 Jul;44 Suppl 2:196-9
pubmed: 19754567
Biol Reprod. 1976 Jun;14(5):579-85
pubmed: 1276322
J Endocrinol. 2000 Jul;166(1):87-93
pubmed: 10856886
Int J Cancer. 2020 May 1;146(9):2628-2635
pubmed: 31523803
Theriogenology. 2004 Aug;62(3-4):631-41
pubmed: 15226018
Reprod Domest Anim. 2015 Feb;50(1):13-6
pubmed: 25358819
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Dec;96(3-4):265-81
pubmed: 16956738
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Nov;99(11):9051-9056
pubmed: 27592429
Biol Reprod. 1975 Nov;13(4):470-4
pubmed: 1241292

Auteurs

Alba Martí (A)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Anna Serrano (A)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Josep Pastor (J)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Teresa Rigau (T)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Ugné Petkevičiuté (U)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Maria Àngels Calvo (MÀ)

Department of Anatomy, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Esteban Leonardo Arosemena (EL)

Department of Anatomy, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Aida Yuste (A)

Department of Anatomy, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

David Prandi (D)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Adrià Aguilar (A)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo (MM)

Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Veterinary School, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.

Classifications MeSH