Determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst mothers of children aged less than six months: results from the BADUTA study in East Java, Indonesia.

BADUTA study Breastfeeding Children aged < 6 months Indonesia Malang District Self-efficacy Sidoarjo District

Journal

International breastfeeding journal
ISSN: 1746-4358
Titre abrégé: Int Breastfeed J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101251562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 01 2021
Historique:
received: 02 09 2020
accepted: 08 01 2021
entrez: 20 1 2021
pubmed: 21 1 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite the increasing rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Indonesia, there is still a need for supportive interventions. The breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers is a key factor positively associated with optimum breastfeeding practices. Our analysis aims to assess the determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst a sample of women with children aged under 6 months in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts, East Java, Indonesia. We used information from 1210 mothers of children aged < 6 months recruited in the BADUTA study conducted in 2015-2016 in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts. The outcome variable in this analysis was mothers' self-efficacy for breastfeeding using the 14 statements in the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form. We evaluated 17 potential predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy, organized into six sub-groups of variables: (1) context/demographic; (2) household factors; (3) maternal characteristics; (4) child characteristics; (5) breastfeeding practices; and (6) antenatal and delivery care. Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine factors associated with mothers' self-efficacy with breastfeeding. More than half of the women in this study had a low level of self-efficacy. One of the factors associated with low breastfeeding self-efficacy found in this study was mothers' problems related to breastfeeding. Mothers who had problems with breastfeeding not related to illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% CI 2.45, 4.36) or problems related to both illness and non-illness conditions (aOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.37, 9.33) had higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy than those who did not have any problems. Compared to mothers who completed university education, there was a significantly higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers who completed primary school or lower (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.16, 3.05); completed junior high school (aOR 2.27; 95% CI 1.42, 3.63); and completed senior high school (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.29, 2.91). Other significant predictors of low breastfeeding self-efficacy were mothers not exposed to any breastfeeding interventions (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.09, 3.22); working outside the house (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.23, 2.32); not obtaining any advice on breastfeeding (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08, 1.82); with low knowledge of breastfeeding (aOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03, 1.84); and delivered by Caesarean section (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05, 1.70). Multipronged breastfeeding education programs and support are required to improve women's self-efficacy with breastfeeding. Improved access to breastfeeding counselors, active support for mothers following cesarean delivery, and increased supporting facilities at workplaces are essential to improve self-efficacy with breastfeeding.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Despite the increasing rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Indonesia, there is still a need for supportive interventions. The breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers is a key factor positively associated with optimum breastfeeding practices. Our analysis aims to assess the determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst a sample of women with children aged under 6 months in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts, East Java, Indonesia.
METHODS
We used information from 1210 mothers of children aged < 6 months recruited in the BADUTA study conducted in 2015-2016 in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts. The outcome variable in this analysis was mothers' self-efficacy for breastfeeding using the 14 statements in the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form. We evaluated 17 potential predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy, organized into six sub-groups of variables: (1) context/demographic; (2) household factors; (3) maternal characteristics; (4) child characteristics; (5) breastfeeding practices; and (6) antenatal and delivery care. Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine factors associated with mothers' self-efficacy with breastfeeding.
RESULTS
More than half of the women in this study had a low level of self-efficacy. One of the factors associated with low breastfeeding self-efficacy found in this study was mothers' problems related to breastfeeding. Mothers who had problems with breastfeeding not related to illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% CI 2.45, 4.36) or problems related to both illness and non-illness conditions (aOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.37, 9.33) had higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy than those who did not have any problems. Compared to mothers who completed university education, there was a significantly higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers who completed primary school or lower (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.16, 3.05); completed junior high school (aOR 2.27; 95% CI 1.42, 3.63); and completed senior high school (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.29, 2.91). Other significant predictors of low breastfeeding self-efficacy were mothers not exposed to any breastfeeding interventions (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.09, 3.22); working outside the house (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.23, 2.32); not obtaining any advice on breastfeeding (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08, 1.82); with low knowledge of breastfeeding (aOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03, 1.84); and delivered by Caesarean section (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05, 1.70).
CONCLUSIONS
Multipronged breastfeeding education programs and support are required to improve women's self-efficacy with breastfeeding. Improved access to breastfeeding counselors, active support for mothers following cesarean delivery, and increased supporting facilities at workplaces are essential to improve self-efficacy with breastfeeding.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33468196
doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00357-5
pii: 10.1186/s13006-021-00357-5
pmc: PMC7816511
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

12

Références

Midwifery. 2016 May;36:92-8
pubmed: 27106949
Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Oct 12;1:18
pubmed: 17034645
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):207-15
pubmed: 17700097
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):134-47
pubmed: 15855283
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(1):91-104
pubmed: 24561977
Int Breastfeed J. 2013 Dec 20;8(1):18
pubmed: 24359640
Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):115-32
pubmed: 11227840
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):496-506
pubmed: 15687461
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):725-32
pubmed: 26444176
Midwifery. 2007 Dec;23(4):382-91
pubmed: 17126967
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Apr;12:131-141
pubmed: 28394659
BMJ. 2012 Jan 25;344:d8287
pubmed: 22277543
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504
pubmed: 26869576
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;26(Suppl 1):S31-S35
pubmed: 28625034
BMC Nurs. 2019 Aug 16;18(Suppl 1):30
pubmed: 31427892
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Apr;69(4):828-39
pubmed: 22765355
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):734-44
pubmed: 14649593
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Jul;15(5):677-83
pubmed: 20552261
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):e18521
pubmed: 32897234
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 May 23;12:36
pubmed: 22621668
Breastfeed Med. 2013 Apr;8:181-6
pubmed: 23186385
Breastfeed Med. 2014 Apr;9(3):113-27
pubmed: 24568270
Breastfeed Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(6):301-7
pubmed: 24902047
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Aug 19;2014:510793
pubmed: 27379293
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):296-306
pubmed: 23592322
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 26;16:90
pubmed: 27118118
J Hum Lact. 2017 Aug;33(3):486-499
pubmed: 28644764
Int Breastfeed J. 2010 Aug 23;5:9
pubmed: 20731820
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Oct;31(5):428-41
pubmed: 18324667
Nurs Open. 2019 Mar 21;6(3):765-771
pubmed: 31367398
J Hum Lact. 1999 Sep;15(3):195-201
pubmed: 10578797
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S20
pubmed: 24564836

Auteurs

Christiana Rialine Titaley (CR)

Faculty of Medicine, Pattimura University, Jl. Ir. M. Putuhena, Poka, Ambon, 97233, Indonesia. christiana_rialine@yahoo.com.

Michael J Dibley (MJ)

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Iwan Ariawan (I)

Center for Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Anifatun Mu'asyaroh (A)

Center for Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Ashraful Alam (A)

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Rita Damayanti (R)

Center for Health Research, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Tran Thanh Do (TT)

National Institute of Nutrition, Hanoi, 116110, Vietnam.

Elaine Ferguson (E)

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.

Kyaw Htet (K)

Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization, Regional Center for Food and Nutrition, Pusat Kajian Gizi Regional Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Raya 6, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.

Mu Li (M)

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia.

Aang Sutrisna (A)

Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN), Jakarta, Indonesia.

Umi Fahmida (U)

Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization, Regional Center for Food and Nutrition, Pusat Kajian Gizi Regional Universitas Indonesia, Salemba Raya 6, Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH