Determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst mothers of children aged less than six months: results from the BADUTA study in East Java, Indonesia.
BADUTA study
Breastfeeding
Children aged < 6 months
Indonesia
Malang District
Self-efficacy
Sidoarjo District
Journal
International breastfeeding journal
ISSN: 1746-4358
Titre abrégé: Int Breastfeed J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101251562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 01 2021
19 01 2021
Historique:
received:
02
09
2020
accepted:
08
01
2021
entrez:
20
1
2021
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the increasing rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Indonesia, there is still a need for supportive interventions. The breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers is a key factor positively associated with optimum breastfeeding practices. Our analysis aims to assess the determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst a sample of women with children aged under 6 months in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts, East Java, Indonesia. We used information from 1210 mothers of children aged < 6 months recruited in the BADUTA study conducted in 2015-2016 in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts. The outcome variable in this analysis was mothers' self-efficacy for breastfeeding using the 14 statements in the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form. We evaluated 17 potential predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy, organized into six sub-groups of variables: (1) context/demographic; (2) household factors; (3) maternal characteristics; (4) child characteristics; (5) breastfeeding practices; and (6) antenatal and delivery care. Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine factors associated with mothers' self-efficacy with breastfeeding. More than half of the women in this study had a low level of self-efficacy. One of the factors associated with low breastfeeding self-efficacy found in this study was mothers' problems related to breastfeeding. Mothers who had problems with breastfeeding not related to illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% CI 2.45, 4.36) or problems related to both illness and non-illness conditions (aOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.37, 9.33) had higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy than those who did not have any problems. Compared to mothers who completed university education, there was a significantly higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers who completed primary school or lower (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.16, 3.05); completed junior high school (aOR 2.27; 95% CI 1.42, 3.63); and completed senior high school (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.29, 2.91). Other significant predictors of low breastfeeding self-efficacy were mothers not exposed to any breastfeeding interventions (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.09, 3.22); working outside the house (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.23, 2.32); not obtaining any advice on breastfeeding (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08, 1.82); with low knowledge of breastfeeding (aOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03, 1.84); and delivered by Caesarean section (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05, 1.70). Multipronged breastfeeding education programs and support are required to improve women's self-efficacy with breastfeeding. Improved access to breastfeeding counselors, active support for mothers following cesarean delivery, and increased supporting facilities at workplaces are essential to improve self-efficacy with breastfeeding.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite the increasing rate of exclusive breastfeeding in Indonesia, there is still a need for supportive interventions. The breastfeeding self-efficacy of mothers is a key factor positively associated with optimum breastfeeding practices. Our analysis aims to assess the determinants of low breastfeeding self-efficacy amongst a sample of women with children aged under 6 months in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts, East Java, Indonesia.
METHODS
We used information from 1210 mothers of children aged < 6 months recruited in the BADUTA study conducted in 2015-2016 in Malang and Sidoarjo Districts. The outcome variable in this analysis was mothers' self-efficacy for breastfeeding using the 14 statements in the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form. We evaluated 17 potential predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy, organized into six sub-groups of variables: (1) context/demographic; (2) household factors; (3) maternal characteristics; (4) child characteristics; (5) breastfeeding practices; and (6) antenatal and delivery care. Logistic regression analyses were employed to examine factors associated with mothers' self-efficacy with breastfeeding.
RESULTS
More than half of the women in this study had a low level of self-efficacy. One of the factors associated with low breastfeeding self-efficacy found in this study was mothers' problems related to breastfeeding. Mothers who had problems with breastfeeding not related to illness (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.27; 95% CI 2.45, 4.36) or problems related to both illness and non-illness conditions (aOR 3.57; 95% CI 1.37, 9.33) had higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy than those who did not have any problems. Compared to mothers who completed university education, there was a significantly higher odds of low breastfeeding self-efficacy in mothers who completed primary school or lower (aOR 1.88; 95% CI 1.16, 3.05); completed junior high school (aOR 2.27; 95% CI 1.42, 3.63); and completed senior high school (aOR 1.94; 95% CI 1.29, 2.91). Other significant predictors of low breastfeeding self-efficacy were mothers not exposed to any breastfeeding interventions (aOR 1.87; 95% CI 1.09, 3.22); working outside the house (aOR 1.69; 95% CI 1.23, 2.32); not obtaining any advice on breastfeeding (aOR 1.40; 95% CI 1.08, 1.82); with low knowledge of breastfeeding (aOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.03, 1.84); and delivered by Caesarean section (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.05, 1.70).
CONCLUSIONS
Multipronged breastfeeding education programs and support are required to improve women's self-efficacy with breastfeeding. Improved access to breastfeeding counselors, active support for mothers following cesarean delivery, and increased supporting facilities at workplaces are essential to improve self-efficacy with breastfeeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33468196
doi: 10.1186/s13006-021-00357-5
pii: 10.1186/s13006-021-00357-5
pmc: PMC7816511
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Références
Midwifery. 2016 May;36:92-8
pubmed: 27106949
Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Oct 12;1:18
pubmed: 17034645
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):207-15
pubmed: 17700097
Health Promot Pract. 2005 Apr;6(2):134-47
pubmed: 15855283
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2014;23(1):91-104
pubmed: 24561977
Int Breastfeed J. 2013 Dec 20;8(1):18
pubmed: 24359640
Demography. 2001 Feb;38(1):115-32
pubmed: 11227840
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):496-506
pubmed: 15687461
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2015 Jul-Aug;23(4):725-32
pubmed: 26444176
Midwifery. 2007 Dec;23(4):382-91
pubmed: 17126967
Breastfeed Med. 2017 Apr;12:131-141
pubmed: 28394659
BMJ. 2012 Jan 25;344:d8287
pubmed: 22277543
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):491-504
pubmed: 26869576
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;26(Suppl 1):S31-S35
pubmed: 28625034
BMC Nurs. 2019 Aug 16;18(Suppl 1):30
pubmed: 31427892
J Adv Nurs. 2013 Apr;69(4):828-39
pubmed: 22765355
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;32(6):734-44
pubmed: 14649593
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Jul;15(5):677-83
pubmed: 20552261
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 8;9(9):e18521
pubmed: 32897234
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 May 23;12:36
pubmed: 22621668
Breastfeed Med. 2013 Apr;8:181-6
pubmed: 23186385
Breastfeed Med. 2014 Apr;9(3):113-27
pubmed: 24568270
Breastfeed Med. 2014 Jul-Aug;9(6):301-7
pubmed: 24902047
Int Sch Res Notices. 2014 Aug 19;2014:510793
pubmed: 27379293
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):475-90
pubmed: 26869575
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Jan;18(1):296-306
pubmed: 23592322
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Apr 26;16:90
pubmed: 27118118
J Hum Lact. 2017 Aug;33(3):486-499
pubmed: 28644764
Int Breastfeed J. 2010 Aug 23;5:9
pubmed: 20731820
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Oct;31(5):428-41
pubmed: 18324667
Nurs Open. 2019 Mar 21;6(3):765-771
pubmed: 31367398
J Hum Lact. 1999 Sep;15(3):195-201
pubmed: 10578797
BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3:S20
pubmed: 24564836