Co-production of acetoin and succinic acid by metabolically engineered Enterobacter cloacae.
Acetoin
Co-production
Enterobacter cloacae
Metabolic engineering
Succinic acid
Journal
Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jan 2021
19 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
09
09
2020
accepted:
07
01
2021
entrez:
20
1
2021
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
21
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Renewable chemicals have attracted attention due to increasing interest in environmental concerns and resource utilization. Biobased production of industrial compounds from nonfood biomass has become increasingly important as a sustainable replacement for traditional petroleum-based production processes depending on fossil resources. Therefore, we engineered an Enterobacter cloacae budC and ldhA double-deletion strain (namely, EC∆budC∆ldhA) to redirect carbon fluxes and optimized the culture conditions to co-produce succinic acid and acetoin. In this work, E. cloacae was metabolically engineered to enhance its combined succinic acid and acetoin production during fermentation. Strain EC∆budC∆ldhA was constructed by deleting 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (budC), which is involved in 2,3-butanediol production, and lactate dehydrogenase (ldhA), which is involved in lactic acid production, from the E. cloacae genome. After redirecting and fine-tuning the E. cloacae metabolic flux, succinic acid and acetoin production was enhanced, and the combined production titers of acetoin and succinic acid from glucose were 17.75 and 2.75 g L The engineered strain EC∆budC∆ldhA is useful for the co-production of acetoin and succinic acid and for reducing microbial fermentation costs by combining processes into a single step.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Renewable chemicals have attracted attention due to increasing interest in environmental concerns and resource utilization. Biobased production of industrial compounds from nonfood biomass has become increasingly important as a sustainable replacement for traditional petroleum-based production processes depending on fossil resources. Therefore, we engineered an Enterobacter cloacae budC and ldhA double-deletion strain (namely, EC∆budC∆ldhA) to redirect carbon fluxes and optimized the culture conditions to co-produce succinic acid and acetoin.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In this work, E. cloacae was metabolically engineered to enhance its combined succinic acid and acetoin production during fermentation. Strain EC∆budC∆ldhA was constructed by deleting 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase (budC), which is involved in 2,3-butanediol production, and lactate dehydrogenase (ldhA), which is involved in lactic acid production, from the E. cloacae genome. After redirecting and fine-tuning the E. cloacae metabolic flux, succinic acid and acetoin production was enhanced, and the combined production titers of acetoin and succinic acid from glucose were 17.75 and 2.75 g L
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The engineered strain EC∆budC∆ldhA is useful for the co-production of acetoin and succinic acid and for reducing microbial fermentation costs by combining processes into a single step.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33468210
doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01878-1
pii: 10.1186/s13068-021-01878-1
pmc: PMC7816431
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
26Subventions
Organisme : High-level Talents Project of Dongguan University of Technology
ID : KCYKYQD2017017
Organisme : High-level Talents Project of Dongguan University of Technology
ID : KCYCXPT2017007
Organisme : Guangdong Innovation Research Team for Higher Education
ID : 2017KCXTD030
Références
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Aug;79(16):4838-44
pubmed: 23747698
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 May;98(10):4603-13
pubmed: 24535253
Sci Rep. 2015 Mar 12;5:9033
pubmed: 25761989
Bioresour Technol. 2012 Sep;119:94-8
pubmed: 22728188
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2001 Jan 5;72(1):41-8
pubmed: 11084592
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Aug;41(8):1267-74
pubmed: 24879481
Metab Eng. 2016 Nov;38:483-493
pubmed: 27989804
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2017 Nov;106:114-118
pubmed: 28859805
Metab Eng. 2015 Mar;28:19-27
pubmed: 25499652
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Jan 29;7(1):16
pubmed: 24475980
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 1989 Sep;5(3):223-34
pubmed: 2698228
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012 Jul;95(2):461-9
pubmed: 22297429
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015 Aug;42(8):1105-15
pubmed: 26059458
J Biol Chem. 2014 Feb 28;289(9):6080-90
pubmed: 24429283
Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Jan;160(2):477-85
pubmed: 18830824
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Aug 28;6(1):123
pubmed: 23981315
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014 Mar 26;7(1):44
pubmed: 24669952
Bioresour Technol. 2010 Oct;101(19):7675-8
pubmed: 20472425
Bioresour Technol. 2013 May;135:500-3
pubmed: 23010216
Metab Eng. 2011 May;13(3):328-35
pubmed: 21440082
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 09;6:27667
pubmed: 27279026
Biotechnol Adv. 2009 Nov-Dec;27(6):715-725
pubmed: 19442714
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Dec 15;98(6):1296-304
pubmed: 17570706
Arch Microbiol. 2002 Sep;178(3):193-201
pubmed: 12189420
Metab Eng. 2014 May;23:22-33
pubmed: 24525331