Effectiveness of very low profile thrombectomy device in primary distal medium vessel occlusion, as rescue therapy after incomplete proximal recanalization or following iatrogenic thromboembolic events.
stent
stroke
thrombectomy
thrombolysis
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
26
10
2020
revised:
24
11
2020
accepted:
28
11
2020
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
23
11
2021
entrez:
20
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Recent progress with smaller retrievers has expanded the ability to reach distal brain arteries. We herein report recanalization, bleeding complications and short-term clinical outcomes with the smallest currently known low profile thrombectomy device in patients with primary or secondary distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO). We performed a retrospective analysis of 115 patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in DMVO using the extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI), European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II classification, The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission and discharge to evaluate outcomes. Patients were stratified into three groups: (1) primary isolated distal occlusion (n=34), (2) secondary distal occlusion after MT of a proximal vessel occlusion (n=71), or (3) during endovascular treatment of aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (n=10). Successful distal recanalization, defined as an eTICI score of 2b67, 2c and 3, was achieved in 74.7% (86/115) of patients. More specifically, it was 70.5% (24/34), 73.2% (52/71), and 100% (10/10) of primary DMVO, secondary DMVO after proximal MT, and rescue MT during aneurysm or AVM embolization, respectively. Symptomatic intraparenchymal bleeding occurred in 6.9% (eight patients). In-hospital mortality occurred in 18.1% (19/105) of patients with stroke. The most common cause of death was large infarct, old age, and therapy limitation. Direct or rescue MT of DMVO using a very low profile thrombectomy device is associated with a high rate of successful recanalization and a reasonable rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic complication, despite a risk of 18.1% hospital mortality in elderly patients. Further trials are needed to confirm our results and assess long-term clinical outcomes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recent progress with smaller retrievers has expanded the ability to reach distal brain arteries. We herein report recanalization, bleeding complications and short-term clinical outcomes with the smallest currently known low profile thrombectomy device in patients with primary or secondary distal medium vessel occlusion (DMVO).
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a retrospective analysis of 115 patients receiving mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in DMVO using the extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI), European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS) II classification, The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores at admission and discharge to evaluate outcomes. Patients were stratified into three groups: (1) primary isolated distal occlusion (n=34), (2) secondary distal occlusion after MT of a proximal vessel occlusion (n=71), or (3) during endovascular treatment of aneurysms or arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) (n=10).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Successful distal recanalization, defined as an eTICI score of 2b67, 2c and 3, was achieved in 74.7% (86/115) of patients. More specifically, it was 70.5% (24/34), 73.2% (52/71), and 100% (10/10) of primary DMVO, secondary DMVO after proximal MT, and rescue MT during aneurysm or AVM embolization, respectively. Symptomatic intraparenchymal bleeding occurred in 6.9% (eight patients). In-hospital mortality occurred in 18.1% (19/105) of patients with stroke. The most common cause of death was large infarct, old age, and therapy limitation.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Direct or rescue MT of DMVO using a very low profile thrombectomy device is associated with a high rate of successful recanalization and a reasonable rate of symptomatic hemorrhagic complication, despite a risk of 18.1% hospital mortality in elderly patients. Further trials are needed to confirm our results and assess long-term clinical outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33468609
pii: neurintsurg-2020-017035
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017035
pmc: PMC8606433
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1067-1072Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RC received consulting fee or speaker honoraria from Balt, Medtronic, Microvention, Rapid Medical, Siemens and Stryker. PJM receives public funding related to intracranial aneurysm and vasospasm therapy from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Innosuisse agency. RW received speaker honoria from Bristol Myers Squibb. RR received a travel grant from Boehringer Ingelheim and Microvention.
Références
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Mar;8(3):295-9
pubmed: 25948592
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2872-2884
pubmed: 32757757
Stroke. 2016 Jan;47(1):66-73
pubmed: 26585396
World Neurosurg. 2019 Oct;130:e1098-e1104
pubmed: 31323418
JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452
pubmed: 28763550
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2697-2704
pubmed: 32757749
JAMA. 1999 Dec 1;282(21):2003-11
pubmed: 10591382
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Mar;11(3):215-220
pubmed: 30610069
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:425-428.e1
pubmed: 32035197
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 May;8(5):457-60
pubmed: 25801774
J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jul;46(4):231-237
pubmed: 30771378
Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31
pubmed: 26898852
Lancet. 1998 Oct 17;352(9136):1245-51
pubmed: 9788453
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):51-58
pubmed: 30413830
Neurology. 2012 Sep 25;79(13 Suppl 1):S110-6
pubmed: 23008384
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):143-151
pubmed: 29098320
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2020 Oct;91(10):1055-1059
pubmed: 32934109
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Mar 1;77(3):318-326
pubmed: 31816018
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Mar;11(3):271-274
pubmed: 30177546
J Neuroimaging. 2018 May;28(3):283-288
pubmed: 29484769
JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88
pubmed: 27673305
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Mar;12(3):279-282
pubmed: 31243066
Front Surg. 2020 Apr 08;7:16
pubmed: 32322587
Stroke. 2020 Nov;51(11):3232-3240
pubmed: 33070714
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Aug;12(8):794-797
pubmed: 32024783
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Oct;17(10):895-904
pubmed: 30264728
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jun;8(6):621-5
pubmed: 25935925
Int J Stroke. 2015 Aug;10(6):969-78
pubmed: 25864723
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Nov;8(11):1178-1180
pubmed: 26566880
World Neurosurg. 2020 Apr;136:e419-e439
pubmed: 31931242