The surprising role of the default mode network in naturalistic perception.
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 01 2021
19 01 2021
Historique:
received:
26
05
2020
accepted:
15
12
2020
entrez:
20
1
2021
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
23
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The default mode network (DMN) is a group of high-order brain regions recently implicated in processing external naturalistic events, yet it remains unclear what cognitive function it serves. Here we identified the cognitive states predictive of DMN fMRI coactivation. Particularly, we developed a state-fluctuation pattern analysis, matching network coactivations across a short movie with retrospective behavioral sampling of movie events. Network coactivation was selectively correlated with the state of surprise across movie events, compared to all other cognitive states (e.g. emotion, vividness). The effect was exhibited in the DMN, but not dorsal attention or visual networks. Furthermore, surprise was found to mediate DMN coactivations with hippocampus and nucleus accumbens. These unexpected findings point to the DMN as a major hub in high-level prediction-error representations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33469113
doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01602-z
pii: 10.1038/s42003-020-01602-z
pmc: PMC7815915
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
79Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BB/H008217/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Nat Commun. 2016 Jul 18;7:12141
pubmed: 27424918
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 11;6(4):e17463
pubmed: 21494597
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jul;11(7):299-306
pubmed: 17548229
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
pubmed: 11994752
Netw Neurosci. 2017 Dec 01;1(4):339-356
pubmed: 30090870
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):676-82
pubmed: 11209064
Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1010-20
pubmed: 12507366
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 5;369(1653):
pubmed: 25180304
Psychol Aging. 2002 Dec;17(4):677-89
pubmed: 12507363
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38
pubmed: 18400922
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7;100(1):253-8
pubmed: 12506194
J Neurosci. 2018 Nov 7;38(45):9689-9699
pubmed: 30249790
Trends Neurosci. 2011 Oct;34(10):548-59
pubmed: 21889806
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Fall;9(5):648-63
pubmed: 23965122
Top Cogn Sci. 2019 Sep 4;:
pubmed: 31486286
J Neurosci. 2011 Feb 23;31(8):2906-15
pubmed: 21414912
Hum Brain Mapp. 2006 Apr;27(4):306-13
pubmed: 16092133
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Aug 15;41(12):3318-3341
pubmed: 32500968
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Apr;23(2):255-60
pubmed: 23206590
Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):143-51
pubmed: 21420893
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 29;360(1456):815-36
pubmed: 15937014
J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 15;31(24):9032-42
pubmed: 21677186
J Neurosci. 2005 Sep 28;25(39):8854-66
pubmed: 16192375
Neuron. 2010 Feb 25;65(4):541-9
pubmed: 20188658
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):445-53
pubmed: 16054861
Cereb Cortex. 2018 Sep 1;28(9):3095-3114
pubmed: 28981612
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 26;9(1):1673
pubmed: 29700377
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:433-47
pubmed: 25938726
Brain Res Rev. 2007 Nov;56(1):27-78
pubmed: 17574681
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4988-5000
pubmed: 28922834
Neuroimage. 2015 Feb 1;106:55-71
pubmed: 25462801
Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jan;20(1):115-125
pubmed: 27918531
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116189
pubmed: 31521825
BMC Neurol. 2014 Oct 14;14:204
pubmed: 25412575
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Jan;103(1):297-321
pubmed: 19889849
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
Neuroimage. 2017 Jan;144(Pt B):262-269
pubmed: 26375206
Neuron. 2014 Jul 2;83(1):238-51
pubmed: 24991964
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Oct;20(10):593-608
pubmed: 31492945
Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):924-35
pubmed: 18054866
J Neurosci. 2010 Oct 13;30(41):13906-15
pubmed: 20943931
Science. 2004 Mar 12;303(5664):1634-40
pubmed: 15016991