PHI density prospectively improves prostate cancer detection.
Decision curve analysis (DCA)
PHI density (PHID)
Prostate cancer
Prostate health index (PHI)
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2021
Sep 2021
Historique:
received:
11
08
2020
accepted:
29
12
2020
pubmed:
21
1
2021
medline:
11
2
2022
entrez:
20
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the Prostate Health Index (PHI) density (PHID) in direct comparison with PHI in a prospective large cohort. PHID values were calculated from prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA and [- 2]proPSA and prostate volume. The 1057 patients included 552 men with prostate cancer (PCa) and 505 with no evidence of malignancy (NEM). In detail, 562 patients were biopsied at the Charité Hospital Berlin and 495 patients at the Sana Hospital Offenbach. All patients received systematic or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsies. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing areas under the ROC-curves (AUC). The decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed with the MATLAB Neural Network Toolbox. PHID provided a significant larger AUC than PHI (0.835 vs. 0.801; p = 0.0013) in our prospective cohort of 1057 men from 2 centers. The DCA had a maximum net benefit of ~ 5% for PHID vs. PHI between 35 and 65% threshold probability. In those 698 men within the WHO-calibrated PSA grey-zone up to 8 ng/ml, PHID was also significantly better than PHI (AUC 0.819 vs. 0.789; p = 0.0219). But PHID was not different from PHI in the detection of significant PCa. Based on ROC analysis and DCA, PHID had an advantage in comparison with PHI alone to detect any PCa but PHI and PHID performed equal in detecting significant PCa.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33471165
doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03585-2
pii: 10.1007/s00345-020-03585-2
pmc: PMC8510982
doi:
Substances chimiques
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3273-3279Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):921-7
pubmed: 20189711
Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):415.e13-9
pubmed: 27178729
Asian J Androl. 2020 Sep-Oct;22(5):539-543
pubmed: 31929198
J Urol. 2011 May;185(5):1650-5
pubmed: 21419439
Eur Urol. 2019 Apr;75(4):558-561
pubmed: 30396635
Urology. 2019 Jul;129:153-159
pubmed: 30926382
World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1207-1214
pubmed: 31440806
Eur Urol. 2015 Jul;68(1):139-46
pubmed: 25151013
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):709-14
pubmed: 26976204
Clin Chim Acta. 2020 Feb;501:174-178
pubmed: 31758936
J Urol. 2014 Jul;192(1):60-6
pubmed: 24518780
BJU Int. 2017 Dec;120(6):793-798
pubmed: 28058757
Urology. 2017 Dec;110:148-153
pubmed: 28844600
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Jan - Feb;42(1):25-32
pubmed: 28811062
Clin Chem. 2013 Jan;59(1):280-8
pubmed: 23213079
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 11;21(4):
pubmed: 32053990
Cancer. 1997 Jan 1;79(1):104-9
pubmed: 8988733
Clin Chem. 2013 Jan;59(1):306-14
pubmed: 23213080
BJU Int. 2017 Jul;120(1):61-68
pubmed: 27743489
Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Feb 24;18(3):
pubmed: 28245570
Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):455-66
pubmed: 22078333
BJU Int. 2018 Apr;121(4):619-626
pubmed: 29232037
Eur Urol. 2011 Aug;60(2):214-22
pubmed: 21482022
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1095:15-39
pubmed: 30229547
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 27;8(45):79279-79288
pubmed: 29108306
Prostate. 2009 Feb 1;69(2):198-207
pubmed: 18942119
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1163-9
pubmed: 25463993
Urol Int. 2014;93(2):135-45
pubmed: 24732975
Eur Urol. 2013 Jun;63(6):986-94
pubmed: 23375961
Eur J Clin Invest. 2012 Feb;42(2):216-28
pubmed: 21726217