Reoperation and Mortality Rates Following Elective 1 to 2 Level Lumbar Fusion: A Large State Database Analysis.
health care costs
humans
inpatients
length of stay
lumbar vertebrae
quality of life
reoperation
retrospective studies
risk factors
spinal fusion
Journal
Global spine journal
ISSN: 2192-5682
Titre abrégé: Global Spine J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101596156
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2022
Oct 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
1
2021
medline:
22
1
2021
entrez:
21
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Retrospective cohort. Reoperation to lumbar spinal fusion creates significant burden on patient quality of life and healthcare costs. We assessed rates, etiologies, and risk factors for reoperation following elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion. Patients undergoing elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were identified using the Health Care Utilization Project (HCUP) state inpatient databases from Florida and California. Patients were tracked for 5 years for any subsequent lumbar fusion. Cox proportional hazard analyses for reoperation were assessed using the following covariates: fusion approach type, age, race, Charlson comormidity index, gender, and length of stay. Distribution of etiologies for reoperation was then assessed. 71, 456 patients receiving elective 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion were included. A 5-year reoperation rate of 13.53% and mortality rate of 2.22% was seen. Combined anterior-posterior approaches (HR = 0.904, p < 0.05) and TLIF (HR = 0.867, p < 0.001) were associated with reduced risk of reoperation compared to stand-alone anterior approaches and non-TLIF posterior approaches. Age, gender, and number of comorbidities were not associated with risk of reoperation. From 1 to 5 years, degenerative disease rose from 43.50% to 50.31% of reoperations; mechanical failure decreased from 37.65% to 29.77%. TLIF and combined anterior-posterior approaches for 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion are associated with the lowest rate of reoperation. Number of comorbidities and age are not predictive of reoperation. Primary etiologies leading to reoperation were degenerative disease and mechanical failure. Mortality rate is not increased from baseline following 1 to 2 level lumbar fusion.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33472423
doi: 10.1177/2192568220986148
pmc: PMC9609528
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1708-1714Références
Eur Spine J. 2003 Apr;12(2):178-89
pubmed: 12709856
Spine J. 2015 Jul 01;15(7):1536-44
pubmed: 25681581
Spine J. 2012 Mar;12(3):179-85
pubmed: 21937282
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 15;37(14):1260-6
pubmed: 22699448
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Oct 15;32(22):2405-14
pubmed: 18090078
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 15;35(22):1955-64
pubmed: 20959776
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Jan;20(1):45-52
pubmed: 24206038
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Aug 15;41(16):E964-E972
pubmed: 26909838
J Spine Surg. 2015 Dec;1(1):2-18
pubmed: 27683674
Global Spine J. 2012 Dec;2(4):195-206
pubmed: 24353968
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 1;34(17):E618-25
pubmed: 19644321
Int Orthop. 2004 Oct;28(5):294-7
pubmed: 15309326
Methods Inf Med. 2017;56(5):401-406
pubmed: 29582935
Spine J. 2008 Sep-Oct;8(5):747-55
pubmed: 18037354
J Neurosurg Spine. 2005 Jun;2(6):673-8
pubmed: 16028736
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 May;41(10):901-9
pubmed: 26656062
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jun 1;43(11):791-797
pubmed: 29099409
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Oct;25(7):362-9
pubmed: 21716142
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15;38(11):927-35
pubmed: 23232216
Indian J Orthop. 2013 Jul;47(4):340-5
pubmed: 23960276
Global Spine J. 2018 Jun;8(4):388-395
pubmed: 29977725