Enhancing Patient Experience in Office-Based Laryngology Procedures With Passive Virtual Reality.
distraction analgesia
injection laryngoplasty
office-based procedures
virtual reality
Journal
OTO open
ISSN: 2473-974X
Titre abrégé: OTO Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101717942
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
21
10
2020
accepted:
26
10
2020
entrez:
21
1
2021
pubmed:
22
1
2021
medline:
22
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Virtual reality (VR) has been used as nonpharmacologic anxiolysis benefiting patients undergoing office-based procedures. There is little research on VR use in laryngology. This study aims to determine the efficacy of VR as anxiolysis for patients undergoing in-office laryngotracheal procedures. Randomized controlled trial. Tertiary care center. Adult patients undergoing office-based larynx and trachea injections, biopsy, or laser ablation were recruited and randomized to receive standard care with local anesthesia only or local anesthesia with adjunctive VR. Primary end point was procedural anxiety measured by the Subjective Units of Distress Scale (SUDS). Subjective pain, measured using a visual analog scale, satisfaction scores, and procedure time, and baseline anxiety, measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), were also collected. Eight patients were randomized to the control group and 8 to the VR group. SUDS scores were lower in the VR group than in the control group with mean values of 26.25 and 53.13, respectively ( This pilot study suggests that VR distraction may be used as an adjunctive measure to decrease patient anxiety during office-based laryngology procedures. Procedures performed using standard local anesthesia resulted in low pain scores and high satisfaction scores even without adjunctive VR analgesia. 1.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33474521
doi: 10.1177/2473974X20975020
pii: 10.1177_2473974X20975020
pmc: PMC7797579
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2473974X20975020Informations de copyright
© The Authors 2021.
Références
Nurs Res. 1989 Sep-Oct;38(5):286-8
pubmed: 2678015
Anesth Analg. 2020 Jun 30;:
pubmed: 32618627
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Jun;65(6):527-30
pubmed: 8074626
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70
pubmed: 6880820
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Dec;88(12 Suppl 2):S43-9
pubmed: 18036981
J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109635
pubmed: 31662229
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Mar;37(1):31-4
pubmed: 22038278
Laryngoscope. 2010 Feb;120(2):319-25
pubmed: 19998419
Burns. 2011 Feb;37(1):61-8
pubmed: 20692769
J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Jan;23(1):
pubmed: 29155488
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 20;11(12):e0167523
pubmed: 27997539
Burns. 2009 Jun;35(4):491-9
pubmed: 19111995
Clin J Pain. 2008 May;24(4):299-304
pubmed: 18427228
J Burn Care Res. 2014 Sep-Oct;35(5):395-408
pubmed: 24823326
Laryngoscope. 2012 Feb;122(2):315-21
pubmed: 22147563
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Jul;38(4):497-504
pubmed: 20509987
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Jan;24(1-2):115-20
pubmed: 24899241
J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77
pubmed: 11832252
Laryngoscope. 2009 Nov;119 Suppl 2:S185-212
pubmed: 19856405
J Perianesth Nurs. 2018 Dec;33(6):981-989
pubmed: 29559294
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):1-15
pubmed: 10769936
Acta Paediatr. 2004 Jun;93(6):830-5
pubmed: 15244235
J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Apr 1;43(3):266-275
pubmed: 29053848