Application of the eleventh revision of the International Classification of Diseases gaming disorder criteria to treatment-seeking patients: Comparison with the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Internet gaming disorder criteria.
Internet gaming disorder
applicability
functional impairment
gaming disorder
treatment-seeker
Journal
Journal of behavioral addictions
ISSN: 2063-5303
Titre abrégé: J Behav Addict
Pays: Hungary
ID NLM: 101602037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jan 2021
20 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
11
06
2020
revised:
11
07
2020
accepted:
30
11
2020
pubmed:
22
1
2021
medline:
14
4
2022
entrez:
21
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The World Health Organization included gaming disorder (GD) in the eleventh revision of International Classification of Diseases in 2019. Due to the lack of diagnostic tools for GD, a definition has not been adequately applied. Therefore, this study aimed to apply an operationalized definition of GD to treatment-seekers. The relationship between the diagnoses of GD and Internet gaming disorder (IGD) in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders was also examined. Methods: Study participants comprised 241 treatment-seekers who had engaged in excessive gaming and experienced related problems. Psychiatrists applied the GD diagnostic criteria to the participants using a diagnostic form developed for this study. Information on gaming behavior and functional impairment was obtained through face-to-face interviews conducted by clinical psychologists. Results: In total, 78.4 and 83.0% of the participants fulfilled the GD and IGD diagnostic criteria, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of GD diagnosis were both high when the IGD diagnosis was used as the gold standard. Participants with GD preferred online PC and console games, spent significantly more time gaming, and showed a higher level of functional impairment compared to those who did not fulfill the GD diagnostic criteria. Discussion and Conclusion: The definition of GD can be successfully applied to treatment-seekers with excessive gaming and related problems. A high concordance of GD and IGD diagnoses was found in those participants with relatively severe symptoms. The development and validation of a diagnostic tool for GD should be explored in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
The World Health Organization included gaming disorder (GD) in the eleventh revision of International Classification of Diseases in 2019. Due to the lack of diagnostic tools for GD, a definition has not been adequately applied. Therefore, this study aimed to apply an operationalized definition of GD to treatment-seekers. The relationship between the diagnoses of GD and Internet gaming disorder (IGD) in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders was also examined. Methods: Study participants comprised 241 treatment-seekers who had engaged in excessive gaming and experienced related problems. Psychiatrists applied the GD diagnostic criteria to the participants using a diagnostic form developed for this study. Information on gaming behavior and functional impairment was obtained through face-to-face interviews conducted by clinical psychologists. Results: In total, 78.4 and 83.0% of the participants fulfilled the GD and IGD diagnostic criteria, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of GD diagnosis were both high when the IGD diagnosis was used as the gold standard. Participants with GD preferred online PC and console games, spent significantly more time gaming, and showed a higher level of functional impairment compared to those who did not fulfill the GD diagnostic criteria. Discussion and Conclusion: The definition of GD can be successfully applied to treatment-seekers with excessive gaming and related problems. A high concordance of GD and IGD diagnoses was found in those participants with relatively severe symptoms. The development and validation of a diagnostic tool for GD should be explored in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33475527
doi: 10.1556/2006.2020.00099
pmc: PMC8969863
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
149-158Références
J Behav Addict. 2017 Jun 29;:1-8
pubmed: 28658960
Comput Human Behav. 2018 Feb;79:238-246
pubmed: 29456287
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Apr;77:101831
pubmed: 32143109
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):267-270
pubmed: 28033714
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;54:123-133
pubmed: 28458097
Addiction. 2015 May;110(5):842-51
pubmed: 25598040
Addict Behav Rep. 2018 Oct 26;9:001-1
pubmed: 31193743
J Behav Addict. 2018 Mar 1;7(1):1-9
pubmed: 29529886
Scand J Psychol. 2018 Oct;59(5):524-531
pubmed: 30004118
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jul;71(7):425-444
pubmed: 28436212
J Behav Addict. 2015 Sep;4(3):119-23
pubmed: 26014667
Addiction. 2016 Mar;111(3):513-22
pubmed: 26449796
J Behav Addict. 2019 Mar 1;8(1):16-24
pubmed: 30663331
Front Psychiatry. 2018 May 08;9:166
pubmed: 29867599
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;54(7):707-718
pubmed: 31631668
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 06;8(2):
pubmed: 30736373
J Clin Med. 2019 Jun 28;8(7):
pubmed: 31261841
Addiction. 2016 Jan;111(1):167-75
pubmed: 26669530
Expert Rev Neurother. 2020 Jan;20(1):85-93
pubmed: 31544539
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 02;9(4):
pubmed: 32252305
Addict Behav. 2020 May;104:106311
pubmed: 31978759
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):707-718
pubmed: 30264606
Addict Behav. 2017 Jan;64:349-356
pubmed: 26621112
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 Aug;18(8):480-5
pubmed: 26252934
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):271-279
pubmed: 28816494
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):503-517
pubmed: 28859487
J Behav Addict. 2017 Sep 1;6(3):285-289
pubmed: 28816514
J Behav Addict. 2018 Sep 1;7(3):562-564
pubmed: 29788746