Ultralow temperature cryoablation: Safety and efficacy of preclinical atrial and ventricular lesions.


Journal

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
received: 29 06 2020
revised: 23 09 2020
accepted: 13 12 2020
pubmed: 22 1 2021
medline: 10 8 2021
entrez: 21 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ultralow temperature cyroablation (ULTC) is designed to create focal, linear, and circumferential lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of atrial and ventricular ULTC lesions in preclinical large animal models. The ULTC system uses nitrogen near its liquid-vapor critical point to cool 11-cm ablation catheters. The catheter can be shaped to specific anatomies using pre-shaped stylets. ULTC was used in 11 swine and four sheep to create atrial (pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation) and ventricular lesions. Acute and 90-day success were evaluated by intracardiac mapping and histologic examination. Cryoadherence was observed during all ULTC applications, ensuring catheter stability at target locations. Local electrograms were completely eliminated immediately after the first single-shot ULTC application in 49 of 53 (92.5%) atrial and in 31 of 32 (96.9%) ventricular applications. Lesion depth as measured on histology preparations was 1.96 ± 0.8 mm in atrial and 5.61 ± 2.2 mm in ventricular lesions. In all animals, voltage maps and histology demonstrated transmural and durable lesions without gaps, surrounded by intact collagen fibers without injury to surrounding tissues. Transient coronary spasm could be provoked with endocardial ULTC in the left ventricle in close proximity to a coronary artery. ULTC created effective and efficient atrial and ventricular lesions in vivo without procedural complications in two large animal models. ULTC lesions were transmural, contiguous, and durable over 3 months.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ultralow temperature cyroablation (ULTC) is designed to create focal, linear, and circumferential lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and durability of atrial and ventricular ULTC lesions in preclinical large animal models.
METHODS AND RESULTS
The ULTC system uses nitrogen near its liquid-vapor critical point to cool 11-cm ablation catheters. The catheter can be shaped to specific anatomies using pre-shaped stylets. ULTC was used in 11 swine and four sheep to create atrial (pulmonary vein isolation and linear ablation) and ventricular lesions. Acute and 90-day success were evaluated by intracardiac mapping and histologic examination. Cryoadherence was observed during all ULTC applications, ensuring catheter stability at target locations. Local electrograms were completely eliminated immediately after the first single-shot ULTC application in 49 of 53 (92.5%) atrial and in 31 of 32 (96.9%) ventricular applications. Lesion depth as measured on histology preparations was 1.96 ± 0.8 mm in atrial and 5.61 ± 2.2 mm in ventricular lesions. In all animals, voltage maps and histology demonstrated transmural and durable lesions without gaps, surrounded by intact collagen fibers without injury to surrounding tissues. Transient coronary spasm could be provoked with endocardial ULTC in the left ventricle in close proximity to a coronary artery.
CONCLUSIONS
ULTC created effective and efficient atrial and ventricular lesions in vivo without procedural complications in two large animal models. ULTC lesions were transmural, contiguous, and durable over 3 months.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33476463
doi: 10.1111/jce.14907
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

570-577

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Références

Jaïs P, Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, et al. A focal source of atrial fibrillation treated by discrete radiofrequency ablation. Circulation. 1997;95:572-576.
Shah DC, Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, et al. Electrophysiologically guided ablation of the pulmonary veins for the curative treatment of atrial fibrillation. Ann Med. 2000;32:408-416.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235-2245.
Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140:1779-1788.
Hoffmann E, Straube F, Wegscheider K, et al. Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2019;21:1313-1324.
Nery PB, Belliveau D, Nair GM, et al. Relationship between pulmonary vein reconnection and atrial fibrillation recurrence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2:474-483.
Bredikis A, Wilber D. Cryoablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias. Elsevier/Saunders; 2011:107.
Lustgarten DL, Keane D, Ruskin J. Cryothermal ablation: mechanism of tissue injury and current experience in the treatment of tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1999;41:481-498.
Khairy P, Rivard L, Guerra PG, et al. Morphometric ablation lesion characteristics comparing 4, 6, and 8 mm electrode-tip cryocatheters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2008;19:1203-1207.
Hunt GB, Chard RB, Johnson DC, Ross DL. Comparison of early and late dimensions and arrhythmogenicity of cryolesions in the normothermic canine heart. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:313-318.
Rozen G, Ptaszek LM, Zilberman I, et al. Safety and efficacy of delivering high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation lesions utilizing a novel temperature sensing technology. Europace. 2018;20(FI_3):f444-f450.
Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Govari A, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:467-479.
Barkagan M, Contreras-Valdes FM, Leshem E, Buxton AE, Nakagawa H, Anter E. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: safety, efficacy, and long-term durability. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:1287-1296.
Aryana A, Morkoch S, Bailey S, et al. Acute procedural and cryoballoon characteristics from cryoablation of atrial fibrillation using the first- and second-generation cryoballoon: a retrospective comparative study with follow-up outcomes. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2014;41:177-186.
Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Schmidt B, et al. Improved procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel second-generation cryoballoon. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:492-497.
Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, et al. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1174-1180.
Mori H, Kato R, Sumitomo N, et al. Relationship between the ablation index, lesion formation, and incidence of steam pops. J Arrhythm. 2019;35:636-644.
Kuo L, Shirai Y, Muser D, et al. Comparison of the arrhythmogenic substrate between men and women with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:1414-1420.
Thompson N, Frontera A, Takigawa M, et al. Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2017;9:47-54.
Komatsu Y, Daly M, Sacher F, et al. Endocardial ablation to eliminate epicardial arrhythmia substrate in scar-related ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1416-1426.
Bourier F, Fahrig R, Wang P, et al. Accuracy assessment of catheter guidance technology in electrophysiology procedures: a comparison of a new 3D-based fluoroscopy navigation system to current electroanatomic mapping systems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:74-83.

Auteurs

Felix Bourier (F)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Masateru Takigawa (M)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Anna Lam (A)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Konstantinos Vlachos (K)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

F Daniel Ramirez (FD)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Claire A Martin (CA)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Antonio Frontera (A)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Takeshi Kitamura (T)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Josselin Duchateau (J)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Thomas Pambrun (T)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Nicolas Derval (N)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Arnaud Denis (A)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Jerry Cox (J)

ADAGIO Medical, Laguna Hills, California, USA.

David Cabrita (D)

ADAGIO Medical, Laguna Hills, California, USA.

Alexander Babkin (A)

ADAGIO Medical, Laguna Hills, California, USA.

Marion Constantin (M)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Pierre Jais (P)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Frédéric Sacher (F)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Rémi Dubois (R)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Oliver Bernus (O)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Michel Haissaguerre (M)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Mélèze Hocini (M)

IHU LIRYC ANR-10-IAHU-04, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut Lévêque, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux-Pessac, France.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH