Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus cytoreductive surgery alone for colorectal peritoneal metastases (PRODIGE 7): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2021
Historique:
received: 04 05 2020
revised: 30 07 2020
accepted: 25 09 2020
pubmed: 22 1 2021
medline: 20 2 2021
entrez: 21 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery has been associated with encouraging survival results in some patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were eligible for complete macroscopic resection. We aimed to assess the specific benefit of adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone. We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 17 cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had histologically proven colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases, WHO performance status of 0 or 1, a Peritoneal Cancer Index of 25 or less, and were eligible to receive systemic chemotherapy for 6 months (ie, they had adequate organ function and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks). Patients in whom complete macroscopic resection or surgical resection with less than 1 mm residual tumour tissue was completed were randomly assigned (1:1) to cytoreductive surgery with or without oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation, and stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction, number of previous systemic chemotherapy lines, and timing of protocol-mandated systemic chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was administered by the closed (360 mg/m Between Feb 11, 2008, and Jan 6, 2014, 265 patients were included and randomly assigned, 133 to the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 132 to the cytoreductive surgery alone group. After median follow-up of 63·8 months (IQR 53·0-77·1), median overall survival was 41·7 months (95% CI 36·2-53·8) in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 41·2 months (35·1-49·7) in the cytoreductive surgery group (hazard ratio 1·00 [95·37% CI 0·63-1·58]; stratified log-rank p=0·99). At 30 days, two (2%) treatment-related deaths had occurred in each group.. Grade 3 or worse adverse events at 30 days were similar in frequency between groups (56 [42%] of 133 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group vs 42 [32%] of 132 patients in the cytoreductive surgery group; p=0·083); however, at 60 days, grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group (34 [26%] of 131 vs 20 [15%] of 130; p=0·035). Considering the absence of an overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery and more frequent postoperative late complications with this combination, our data suggest that cytoreductive surgery alone should be the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal metastases. Institut National du Cancer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique du Cancer, Ligue Contre le Cancer.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to cytoreductive surgery has been associated with encouraging survival results in some patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases who were eligible for complete macroscopic resection. We aimed to assess the specific benefit of adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery compared with receiving cytoreductive surgery alone.
METHODS
We did a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial at 17 cancer centres in France. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years and had histologically proven colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases, WHO performance status of 0 or 1, a Peritoneal Cancer Index of 25 or less, and were eligible to receive systemic chemotherapy for 6 months (ie, they had adequate organ function and life expectancy of at least 12 weeks). Patients in whom complete macroscopic resection or surgical resection with less than 1 mm residual tumour tissue was completed were randomly assigned (1:1) to cytoreductive surgery with or without oxaliplatin-based HIPEC. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation, and stratified by centre, completeness of cytoreduction, number of previous systemic chemotherapy lines, and timing of protocol-mandated systemic chemotherapy. Oxaliplatin HIPEC was administered by the closed (360 mg/m
FINDINGS
Between Feb 11, 2008, and Jan 6, 2014, 265 patients were included and randomly assigned, 133 to the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 132 to the cytoreductive surgery alone group. After median follow-up of 63·8 months (IQR 53·0-77·1), median overall survival was 41·7 months (95% CI 36·2-53·8) in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group and 41·2 months (35·1-49·7) in the cytoreductive surgery group (hazard ratio 1·00 [95·37% CI 0·63-1·58]; stratified log-rank p=0·99). At 30 days, two (2%) treatment-related deaths had occurred in each group.. Grade 3 or worse adverse events at 30 days were similar in frequency between groups (56 [42%] of 133 patients in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group vs 42 [32%] of 132 patients in the cytoreductive surgery group; p=0·083); however, at 60 days, grade 3 or worse adverse events were more common in the cytoreductive surgery plus HIPEC group (34 [26%] of 131 vs 20 [15%] of 130; p=0·035).
INTERPRETATION
Considering the absence of an overall survival benefit after adding HIPEC to cytoreductive surgery and more frequent postoperative late complications with this combination, our data suggest that cytoreductive surgery alone should be the cornerstone of therapeutic strategies with curative intent for colorectal peritoneal metastases.
FUNDING
Institut National du Cancer, Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique du Cancer, Ligue Contre le Cancer.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33476595
pii: S1470-2045(20)30599-4
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30599-4
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Oxaliplatin 04ZR38536J
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00769405']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

256-266

Investigateurs

Pascale Mariani (P)
Cécile Brigand (C)
Jean-Marc Bereder (JM)
Simon Msika (S)
Guillaume Portier (G)
Patrick Rat (P)

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

François Quénet (F)

Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. Electronic address: francois.quenet@icm.unicancer.fr.

Dominique Elias (D)

Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Lise Roca (L)

Biometrics Unit, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Diane Goéré (D)

Department of Surgery, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Laurent Ghouti (L)

Department of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Purpan, Toulouse, France.

Marc Pocard (M)

Surgical Oncological and Digestive Unit, Paris University, U1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Paris, France.

Olivier Facy (O)

Department of Digestive Surgery and Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Bocage, Dijon, France.

Catherine Arvieux (C)

Department of Oncological Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble, La Tronche, France.

Gérard Lorimier (G)

Department of Surgery, Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France.

Denis Pezet (D)

Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Hôtel Dieu, Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Frédéric Marchal (F)

Department of Oncological Surgery, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France.

Valeria Loi (V)

Department of Digestive and Visceral Surgery, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France.

Pierre Meeus (P)

Department of Oncological Surgery, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

Beata Juzyna (B)

Department of Research & Development, Unicancer, Paris, France.

Hélène de Forges (H)

Department of Clinical Research and Innovation, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Jacques Paineau (J)

Department of Surgery, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France.

Olivier Glehen (O)

Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Bénite, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH