Correlation between Speech Perception Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation and Postoperative Acoustic and Electric Hearing Thresholds.
audiometry
cochlear implant
electrocochleography
hearing test
speech perception
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2021
17 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
11
12
2020
revised:
13
01
2021
accepted:
14
01
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
23
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The reliable prediction of cochlear implant (CI) speech perception outcomes is highly relevant and can facilitate the monitoring of postoperative hearing performance. To date, multiple audiometric, demographic, and surgical variables have shown some degree of correlation with CI speech perception outcomes. In the present study, postsurgical acoustic and electric hearing thresholds that are routinely assessed in clinical practice were compared to CI speech perception outcomes in order to reveal possible markers of postoperative cochlear health. A total of 237 CI recipients were included in this retrospective monocentric study. An analysis of the correlation of postoperative pure-tone averages (PTAs) and electric CI fitting thresholds (T-/C-levels) with speech perception scores for monosyllabic words in quiet was performed. Additionally, a correlation analysis was performed for postoperative acoustic thresholds in intracochlear electrocochleography (EcochG) and speech recognition scores in a smaller group (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33477270
pii: jcm10020324
doi: 10.3390/jcm10020324
pmc: PMC7830395
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Hear Res. 2016 Sep;339:132-41
pubmed: 27371868
Ear Hear. 2013 May-Jun;34(3):342-60
pubmed: 23348845
Ear Hear. 2019 May/Jun;40(3):577-591
pubmed: 30169463
HNO. 2019 Jun;67(Suppl 2):62-68
pubmed: 30944946
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):399-405
pubmed: 25473960
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(1):1-16
pubmed: 25413720
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 11;14(10):e0223625
pubmed: 31603927
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48739
pubmed: 23152797
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Aug;41(7):864-878
pubmed: 32420718
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Dec;27(8):1083-8
pubmed: 17130798
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Oct;35(9):e245-52
pubmed: 25118584
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Apr;33(3):343-7
pubmed: 22388729
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jan 26;12:18
pubmed: 29434534
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jan;35(1):64-71
pubmed: 24317211
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992 Apr;101(4):342-8
pubmed: 1562140
Am J Otol. 1999 Jul;20(4):445-52
pubmed: 10431885
Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):303-11
pubmed: 26671316
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Aug;32(6):962-8
pubmed: 21659922
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1314-9
pubmed: 27579834
Ear Hear. 2005 Aug;26(4 Suppl):2S-6S
pubmed: 16082262
Hear Res. 2015 Apr;322:77-88
pubmed: 25261772
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;131(12):1049-54
pubmed: 16365217
Otol Neurotol. 2020 Mar;41(3):e322-e329
pubmed: 31868779
Ear Hear. 2000 Jun;21(3):227-35
pubmed: 10890731
Front Neurosci. 2017 May 29;11:291
pubmed: 28611574
Ear Hear. 2019 Jul/Aug;40(4):905-917
pubmed: 30335668
HNO. 2006 Jun;54(6):445-50
pubmed: 16189713
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517743887
pubmed: 29205095
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):516-21
pubmed: 23449440
Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20(5):339-48
pubmed: 26340649
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216519833567
pubmed: 30909815
Cochlear Implants Int. 2016 May;17(3):146-50
pubmed: 27078518
Int J Audiol. 2010 Oct;49(10):775-87
pubmed: 20666693
Audiol Neurootol. 2013;18(1):36-47
pubmed: 23095305
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Aug;36(7):1172-80
pubmed: 25839980
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Aug;111:170-173
pubmed: 29958604
Ear Hear. 2000 Feb;21(1):25-31
pubmed: 10708071
Cochlear Implants Int. 2005 Sep;6 Suppl 1:31-4
pubmed: 18792351
Acta Otolaryngol. 1998 Jun;118(3):313-26
pubmed: 9655204
Ear Hear. 2020 Jul/Aug;41(4):935-947
pubmed: 31702597