Hotspots of female genital mutilation/cutting and associated factors among girls in Ethiopia: a spatial and multilevel analysis.
Circumcision
Genital mutilation/cutting
Multilevel
Spatial
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 01 2021
21 01 2021
Historique:
received:
20
02
2020
accepted:
13
01
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
15
5
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful traditional practice that violates the human rights of girls and women. It is widely practiced mainly in Africa including Ethiopia. There are a number of studies on the prevalence of FGM/C in Ethiopia. However, little has been devoted to its spatial epidemiology and associated factors. Hence, this study aimed to explore the spatial pattern and factors affecting FGM/C among girls in Ethiopia. A further analysis of the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey data was conducted, and a total of 6985 girls nested in 603 enumeration areas were included in this analysis. Global Moran's I statistic was employed to test the spatial autocorrelation, and Getis-Ord Gi* as well as Kulldorff's spatial scan statistics were used to detect spatial clusters of FGM/C. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to identify individual and community level factors affecting FGM/C. Spatial clustering of FGM/C was observed (Moran's I = 0.31, p-value < 0.01), and eight significant clusters of FGM/C (hotspots) were detected. The most likely primary SaTScan cluster was detected in the neighborhood areas of Amhara, Afar, Tigray and Oromia regions (LLR = 279.0, p < 0.01), the secondary cluster in Tigray region (LLR = 67.3, p < 0.01), and the third cluster in Somali region (LLR = 55.5, P < 0.01). In the final best fit model, about 83% variation in the odds of FGM/C was attributed to both individual and community level factors. At individual level, older maternal age, higher number of living children, maternal circumcision, perceived beliefs as FGM/C are required by religion, and supporting the continuation of FGM/C practice were factors to increase the odds of FGM/C, whereas, secondary or higher maternal education, better household wealth, and regular media exposure were factors decreasing the odds of FGM/C. Place of residency, Region and Ethnicity were also among the community level factors associated with FGM/C. In this study, spatial clustering of FGM/C among girls was observed in Ethiopia, and FGM/C hotspots were detected in Afar, Amhara, Tigray, Benishangul Gumuz, Oromia, SNNPR and Somali regions including Dire Dawa Town. Both individual and community level factors play a significant role in the practice of FGM/C. Hence, FGM/C hotspots require priority interventions, and it is also better if the targeted interventions consider both individual and community level factors.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) is a harmful traditional practice that violates the human rights of girls and women. It is widely practiced mainly in Africa including Ethiopia. There are a number of studies on the prevalence of FGM/C in Ethiopia. However, little has been devoted to its spatial epidemiology and associated factors. Hence, this study aimed to explore the spatial pattern and factors affecting FGM/C among girls in Ethiopia.
METHODS
A further analysis of the 2016 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey data was conducted, and a total of 6985 girls nested in 603 enumeration areas were included in this analysis. Global Moran's I statistic was employed to test the spatial autocorrelation, and Getis-Ord Gi* as well as Kulldorff's spatial scan statistics were used to detect spatial clusters of FGM/C. Multilevel logistic regression models were fitted to identify individual and community level factors affecting FGM/C.
RESULTS
Spatial clustering of FGM/C was observed (Moran's I = 0.31, p-value < 0.01), and eight significant clusters of FGM/C (hotspots) were detected. The most likely primary SaTScan cluster was detected in the neighborhood areas of Amhara, Afar, Tigray and Oromia regions (LLR = 279.0, p < 0.01), the secondary cluster in Tigray region (LLR = 67.3, p < 0.01), and the third cluster in Somali region (LLR = 55.5, P < 0.01). In the final best fit model, about 83% variation in the odds of FGM/C was attributed to both individual and community level factors. At individual level, older maternal age, higher number of living children, maternal circumcision, perceived beliefs as FGM/C are required by religion, and supporting the continuation of FGM/C practice were factors to increase the odds of FGM/C, whereas, secondary or higher maternal education, better household wealth, and regular media exposure were factors decreasing the odds of FGM/C. Place of residency, Region and Ethnicity were also among the community level factors associated with FGM/C.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, spatial clustering of FGM/C among girls was observed in Ethiopia, and FGM/C hotspots were detected in Afar, Amhara, Tigray, Benishangul Gumuz, Oromia, SNNPR and Somali regions including Dire Dawa Town. Both individual and community level factors play a significant role in the practice of FGM/C. Hence, FGM/C hotspots require priority interventions, and it is also better if the targeted interventions consider both individual and community level factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33478450
doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10235-8
pii: 10.1186/s12889-021-10235-8
pmc: PMC7818563
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
186Références
Stat Med. 2018 Feb 20;37(4):572-589
pubmed: 29114926
Cult Health Sex. 2014 Jun;16(6):603-19
pubmed: 24735172
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Dec;135(3):304-309
pubmed: 27609740
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Dec;107(3):232-5
pubmed: 19716126
Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:45-54
pubmed: 22371659
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Nov 6;3(5):e000549
pubmed: 30483404
Int J Health Geogr. 2003 Dec 19;2(1):9
pubmed: 14687424
J Health Soc Behav. 2005 Jun;46(2):121-40
pubmed: 16028453
BMC Public Health. 2014 Oct 16;14:1076
pubmed: 25318832
Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:321-31
pubmed: 22870046
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Oct 15;116(2):144-51
pubmed: 15358454
Int J Health Geogr. 2009 Oct 12;8:55
pubmed: 19822013
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 07;11(1):e0145329
pubmed: 26741488
BMC Public Health. 2014 Mar 25;14:276
pubmed: 24661558
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Apr;60(4):290-7
pubmed: 16537344
Stat Med. 1995 Apr 30;14(8):799-810
pubmed: 7644860