Intersectoral care management for older people with cognitive impairment during and after hospital stays [intersec-CM]: study protocol for a process evaluation within a randomised controlled trial.
Case management
Cognitive impairment
Complex intervention
Dementia
Hospital discharge
Implementation fidelity
Intersectoral care management
Process evaluation
Transition
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jan 2021
21 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
27
05
2020
accepted:
05
01
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
22
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
In the healthcare system in Germany, different institutions and actors play specific roles in the discharge and transition of patients from hospitals into primary care (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen, Wettbewerb an der Schnittstelle zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Gesundheitsversorgung, 2012). However, there are shortcomings in these intersectoral transitions. Especially in older people with cognitive impairment (PCI), discharge management often lacks coordination and cooperation between healthcare providers. This frequently results in higher rates of unscheduled readmission. The project intersec-CM is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to explore up to what extent an intersectoral care management (ICM) can improve this transition. This ICM is delivered by nurses with special training in care management. The objective of this paper is to describe a mixed-methods process evaluation of the intersectoral care management intervention and the factors that facilitate and inhibit its implementation. Different study designs for process evaluations from previous literature were collected and analysed according to the dimension implementation fidelity, satisfaction with the intervention, feasible transfer into routine care, optimum point of time, frequency and execution of the intervention, and context factors. The actor-network theory was chosen as the theoretic framework for the process evaluation. Based on this theory, a mixed-methods design was developed to combine and integrate qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods. The qualitative part includes semi-structured interviews using topic guides (phase 1) and later in-depth interviews with narrative portions (phase 3), which will be analysed by using the qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. The quantitative survey (phase 2) is conducted with standardised questionnaires. Challenges in data collection include the development of interview guidelines, which require different terminologies depending on every specific actor targeted in the intervention. Conducting the interviews, there is a risk of misunderstanding the older PCI by the interviewer and vice versa. However, the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches as different techniques of process evaluation may help to capture, integrate and analyse data on different dimensions of the intervention. The results of our process evaluation may serve as an implementation guideline for intersectoral care management in the German healthcare system. Furthermore, the approach to evaluate the process of a complex intervention in health care for older PCI may serve as a stimulus to broaden the evidence base also of other complex intervention studies to improve health care for this vulnerable group. The study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald. The study has been registered at the U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03359408 . Registered on 2 December 2017. The approximate date when recruitment to the process evaluation of the study will be completed is 31 May 2021.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
In the healthcare system in Germany, different institutions and actors play specific roles in the discharge and transition of patients from hospitals into primary care (Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen, Wettbewerb an der Schnittstelle zwischen ambulanter und stationärer Gesundheitsversorgung, 2012). However, there are shortcomings in these intersectoral transitions. Especially in older people with cognitive impairment (PCI), discharge management often lacks coordination and cooperation between healthcare providers. This frequently results in higher rates of unscheduled readmission. The project intersec-CM is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that aims to explore up to what extent an intersectoral care management (ICM) can improve this transition. This ICM is delivered by nurses with special training in care management. The objective of this paper is to describe a mixed-methods process evaluation of the intersectoral care management intervention and the factors that facilitate and inhibit its implementation.
METHODS
METHODS
Different study designs for process evaluations from previous literature were collected and analysed according to the dimension implementation fidelity, satisfaction with the intervention, feasible transfer into routine care, optimum point of time, frequency and execution of the intervention, and context factors.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The actor-network theory was chosen as the theoretic framework for the process evaluation. Based on this theory, a mixed-methods design was developed to combine and integrate qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods. The qualitative part includes semi-structured interviews using topic guides (phase 1) and later in-depth interviews with narrative portions (phase 3), which will be analysed by using the qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz. The quantitative survey (phase 2) is conducted with standardised questionnaires.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Challenges in data collection include the development of interview guidelines, which require different terminologies depending on every specific actor targeted in the intervention. Conducting the interviews, there is a risk of misunderstanding the older PCI by the interviewer and vice versa. However, the combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches as different techniques of process evaluation may help to capture, integrate and analyse data on different dimensions of the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results of our process evaluation may serve as an implementation guideline for intersectoral care management in the German healthcare system. Furthermore, the approach to evaluate the process of a complex intervention in health care for older PCI may serve as a stimulus to broaden the evidence base also of other complex intervention studies to improve health care for this vulnerable group. The study was ethically approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ernst-Moritz-Arndt University of Greifswald. The study has been registered at the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03359408 . Registered on 2 December 2017. The approximate date when recruitment to the process evaluation of the study will be completed is 31 May 2021.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33478583
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05021-1
pii: 10.1186/s13063-021-05021-1
pmc: PMC7819226
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03359408']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72Subventions
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : The funding codes (FKZ) are 01GL1701A (German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases / 607 site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald); 01GL1701B (Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Bielefeld); 01GL1701C (Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Bochum); 01GL1701D (Institute of Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Greifswald).
Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : The funding codes (FKZ) are 01GL1701A (German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases / 607 site Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald); 01GL1701B (Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel, Division of Geriatric Psychiatry, Bielefeld); 01GL1701C (Institute of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Bochum); 01GL1701D (Institute of Community Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Community Health, Greifswald).
Références
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Mar;26(5-6):751-765
pubmed: 27534732
Med Care. 1997 Aug;35(8):756-67
pubmed: 9268249
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):996-1004
pubmed: 28746708
Trials. 2013 Jan 12;14:15
pubmed: 23311722
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Jul-Aug;59(1):162-8
pubmed: 24661400
Trials. 2014 Dec 11;15:485
pubmed: 25496425
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015 Sep;42(5):533-44
pubmed: 24193818
Trials. 2014 Oct 22;15:401
pubmed: 25336121
Trials. 2019 Aug 30;20(1):543
pubmed: 31470912
Health Educ Behav. 2000 Apr;27(2):157-66
pubmed: 10768797
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Aug;26(8):1377-85
pubmed: 24811145
Int Psychogeriatr. 2014 Feb;26(2):247-56
pubmed: 24152974
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258
pubmed: 25791983
Trials. 2015 May 03;16:204
pubmed: 25935741
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Sep;22(9):1199-1206
pubmed: 28714738
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Sep 10;11:112
pubmed: 25212062