Psycho-social factors associated with mental resilience in the Corona lockdown.
Adult
COVID-19
/ prevention & control
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Transmission, Infectious
/ prevention & control
Europe
Female
Humans
Male
Mental Health
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Protective Factors
Regression Analysis
Resilience, Psychological
Social Factors
Social Support
Stress, Psychological
/ prevention & control
Young Adult
Journal
Translational psychiatry
ISSN: 2158-3188
Titre abrégé: Transl Psychiatry
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101562664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 01 2021
21 01 2021
Historique:
received:
07
09
2020
accepted:
04
12
2020
revised:
03
12
2020
entrez:
22
1
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
2
2
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is not only a threat to physical health but is also having severe impacts on mental health. Although increases in stress-related symptomatology and other adverse psycho-social outcomes, as well as their most important risk factors have been described, hardly anything is known about potential protective factors. Resilience refers to the maintenance of mental health despite adversity. To gain mechanistic insights about the relationship between described psycho-social resilience factors and resilience specifically in the current crisis, we assessed resilience factors, exposure to Corona crisis-specific and general stressors, as well as internalizing symptoms in a cross-sectional online survey conducted in 24 languages during the most intense phase of the lockdown in Europe (22 March to 19 April) in a convenience sample of N = 15,970 adults. Resilience, as an outcome, was conceptualized as good mental health despite stressor exposure and measured as the inverse residual between actual and predicted symptom total score. Preregistered hypotheses (osf.io/r6btn) were tested with multiple regression models and mediation analyses. Results confirmed our primary hypothesis that positive appraisal style (PAS) is positively associated with resilience (p < 0.0001). The resilience factor PAS also partly mediated the positive association between perceived social support and resilience, and its association with resilience was in turn partly mediated by the ability to easily recover from stress (both p < 0.0001). In comparison with other resilience factors, good stress response recovery and positive appraisal specifically of the consequences of the Corona crisis were the strongest factors. Preregistered exploratory subgroup analyses (osf.io/thka9) showed that all tested resilience factors generalize across major socio-demographic categories. This research identifies modifiable protective factors that can be targeted by public mental health efforts in this and in future pandemics.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33479211
doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
pii: 10.1038/s41398-020-01150-4
pmc: PMC7817958
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
67Subventions
Organisme : Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
ID : CRC1193
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00005/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_A060_1103
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00005/2
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020)
ID : 777804
Pays : International
Références
J Pers. 2009 Dec;77(6):1805-32
pubmed: 19807863
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 02;17(9):
pubmed: 32370116
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 19;21(2):e12894
pubmed: 30777846
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113172
pubmed: 32512357
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113098
pubmed: 32434092
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 14;8(6):e017858
pubmed: 29903782
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Jun 19;:
pubmed: 32562033
Gen Psychiatr. 2020 Mar 6;33(2):e100213
pubmed: 32215365
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 13;11:137
pubmed: 32231597
J Cheminform. 2014 Mar 29;6(1):10
pubmed: 24678909
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 10;11:556
pubmed: 32587539
J Anxiety Disord. 2020 Aug;74:102258
pubmed: 32569905
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 Apr;46(4):227-231
pubmed: 32008958
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Mar;7(3):228-229
pubmed: 32032543
Can J Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;52(4):233-40
pubmed: 17500304
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2017 Dec;26(4):
pubmed: 28147466
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 05;26:e923549
pubmed: 32132521
J Stat Softw. 2010;33(1):1-22
pubmed: 20808728
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 19;9:230
pubmed: 29971021
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Aug;290:113108
pubmed: 32450409
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2012 Mar;6(1):67-71
pubmed: 22490939
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Sep;43(3):692-700
pubmed: 21487904
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 28;9(11):e031859
pubmed: 31784441
Psychol Med. 2016 Oct;46(14):2883-2906
pubmed: 27523506
Nat Med. 2020 May;26(5):631
pubmed: 32367062
Int J Behav Med. 2008;15(3):194-200
pubmed: 18696313
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7
pubmed: 9122299
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;205(4):275-80
pubmed: 24723629
Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(13):2312-2322
pubmed: 28397612
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560
pubmed: 32304649
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Nov;1(11):784-790
pubmed: 31024125
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 31;17(7):
pubmed: 32244498
Int J Biol Sci. 2020 Mar 15;16(10):1732-1738
pubmed: 32226291
Behav Brain Sci. 2015;38:e92
pubmed: 25158686
Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(4):242-250
pubmed: 32272480
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 17;19(2):e32
pubmed: 28213341
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jul;289:113045
pubmed: 32388418
Psychiatry Res. 2020 May;287:112934
pubmed: 32229390
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231924
pubmed: 32298385
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Dec;38(12):2753-2755
pubmed: 32402499
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 06;17(5):
pubmed: 32155789
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e203976
pubmed: 32202646
Lancet. 2020 Mar 14;395(10227):912-920
pubmed: 32112714
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Apr 26;26:e924609
pubmed: 32335579
BMJ. 2020 May 5;369:m1642
pubmed: 32371466