Patient Experiences of the Emergency Laparotomy Pathway: A Qualitative Study.
Journal
World journal of surgery
ISSN: 1432-2323
Titre abrégé: World J Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7704052
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2021
05 2021
Historique:
accepted:
20
12
2020
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
9
7
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Emergency laparotomy (EL) is a commonly performed operation with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite a growing body of literature on outcomes from EL, there is sparse literature on the patient experience. The aim of this study is to capture the perspective of patients on their EL experience. Qualitative methodology is used as a platform to allow patients to express their personal experiences and ideas around the EL process. Participants were consented as a part of a large observational study, established across the three public teaching hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand. Patients who had an EL within the past 4 months were recruited. A recorded interview was conducted either face-to-face or over the telephone, using questions formulated from a previous systematic review on EL outcomes. Transcripts were transported to NVivo and thematically analysed by two reviewers. Fifteen participants were interviewed. The majority of participants were female, New Zealand European and 65 or older. Five important themes were identified. Overall, participants expressed satisfaction with their interactions with hospital staff. However, they wanted more information about their condition, operation and what outcomes might occur. Participants also described post-operative priorities in the acute setting, as well as long-standing physical and emotional impacts. This study provides a better understanding of what is important to patients during the EL process. This information is important when considering ways to improve care and communication with patients undergoing EL.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33479849
doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05936-x
pii: 10.1007/s00268-020-05936-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1362-1369Références
Boyd H, Doleman B, Herrod PJ et al (2019) Association between surgeon special interest and mortality after emergency laparotomy. BJS 106:940–948
doi: 10.1002/bjs.11146
Saunders D, Murray D, Pichel AC et al (2012) Variations in mortality after emergency laparotomy: the first report of the UK emergency laparotomy network. BJA 109(3):368–375
doi: 10.1093/bja/aes165
Oliver CM, Walker E, Giannaris S et al (2015) Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. BJA 115(6):849–860
doi: 10.1093/bja/aev350
Broughton K, Soukhin E, Moot AR et al (2019) The time has come for New Zealand to improve outcomes after emergency laparotomy. NZMJ 132(1488):55–61
Symons NR, Moorthy K, Almoudaris AM et al (2013) Mortality in high-risk emergency general surgical admissions. BJS 100(10):1318–1325
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9208
Birks M, Mills J. 2015 Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage
Rubin EB, Buehler AE, Halpern SD (2016) States worse than death among hospitalized patients with serious illnesses. JAMA Internal Med 176(10):1557–1559
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.4362
Boone HN, Boone DA (2012) Analyzing likert data. JOE 50(2):1–5
Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N, Analysis T (2015). In: Smith JA (ed) Thematic analysis. A practical guide to research methods, Sage Publications Ltd, London p, Qualitative psychology, pp 222–235
Shenton AK (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inform 22(2):63–75
doi: 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ et al (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89(9):1245–1251
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388
Jones CH, O’Neill S, McLean KA, Wigmore SJ, Harrison EM (2017) Patient experience and overall satisfaction after emergency abdominal surgery. BMC Surg 17(1):76
doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0271-5
Desserud KF, Veen T, Søreide K (2016) Emergency general surgery in the geriatric patient. BJS 103(2):e52-61
doi: 10.1002/bjs.10044
Law J, Welch C, Javanmard-Emamghissi H, Clark M, Bisset CN, O’Neil P, Moug SJ, Elf Study Group, Ross B, Oleksiewicz J, Fearnhead N (2020) Decision-making for older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: defining patient and clinician values and priorities. Colorectal Dis 22(11):1694–1703
doi: 10.1111/codi.15165
Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Raval MV et al (2011) Variation in quality of care after emergency general surgery procedures in the elderly. JACS 212(6):1039–1048