Bias evaluation and reduction in 3D OP-OSEM reconstruction in dynamic equilibrium PET studies with 11C-labeled for binding potential analysis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
14
09
2020
accepted:
05
01
2021
entrez:
22
1
2021
pubmed:
23
1
2021
medline:
12
6
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Iterative image reconstruction is widely used in positron emission tomography. However, it is known to contribute to quantitation bias and is particularly pronounced during dynamic studies with 11C-labeled radiotracers where count rates become low towards the end of the acquisition. As the strength of the quantitation bias depends on the counts in the reconstructed frame, it can differ from frame to frame of the acquisition. This is especially relevant in the case of neuro-receptor studies with simultaneous PET/MR when a bolus-infusion protocol is applied to allow the comparison of pre- and post-task effects. Here, count dependent changes in quantitation bias may interfere with task changes. We evaluated the impact of different framing schemes on quantitation bias and its propagation into binding potential (BP) using a phantom decay study with 11C and 3D OP-OSEM. Further, we propose a framing scheme that keeps the true counts per frame constant over the acquisition time as constant framing schemes and conventional increasing framing schemes are unlikely to achieve stable bias values during the acquisition time range. For a constant framing scheme with 5 minutes frames, the BP bias was 7.13±2.01% (10.8% to 3.8%) compared to 5.63±2.85% (7.8% to 4.0%) for conventional increasing framing schemes. Using the proposed constant true counts framing scheme, a stabilization of the BP bias was achieved at 2.56±3.92% (3.5% to 1.7%). The change in BP bias was further studied by evaluating the linear slope during the acquisition time interval. The lowest slope values were observed in the constant true counts framing scheme. The constant true counts framing scheme was effective for BP bias stabilization at relevant activity and time ranges. The mean BP bias under these conditions was 2.56±3.92%, which represents the lower limit for the detection of changes in BP during equilibrium and is especially important in the case of cognitive tasks where the expected changes are low.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33481896
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245580
pii: PONE-D-20-28702
pmc: PMC7822533
doi:
Substances chimiques
Carbon Radioisotopes
0
Carbon-11
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0245580Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Mar 7;52(5):1505-26
pubmed: 17301468
Nuklearmedizin. 2011;50(2):74-82
pubmed: 21286660
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):244-50
pubmed: 14741662
Biol Psychiatry. 2015 Feb 1;77(3):266-275
pubmed: 25156701
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1997 Nov;14(11):2914-23
pubmed: 9379247
Mol Psychiatry. 2018 Apr;23(4):824-832
pubmed: 28397841
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 Jan 10;7(1):2
pubmed: 31925574
Hell J Nucl Med. 2015 May-Aug;18(2):140-5
pubmed: 26187214
Neuroimage. 2008 Jan 1;39(1):359-68
pubmed: 17920931
EJNMMI Phys. 2020 May 12;7(1):31
pubmed: 32399664
Phys Med Biol. 2011 Feb 21;56(4):931-49
pubmed: 21248391
Phys Med Biol. 2014 Sep 21;59(18):5441-55
pubmed: 25164868
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jan 7;60(1):15-29
pubmed: 25479254
Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jun 21;53(12):3217-30
pubmed: 18506070
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Aug;20(8):804-14
pubmed: 11513031
J Nucl Med. 2007 Jul;48(7):1207-15
pubmed: 17574984
J Nucl Med. 2007 Feb;48(2):247-52
pubmed: 17268022
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2017 Aug;37(8):2716-2727
pubmed: 27742888
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:195-202
pubmed: 24795154
J Nucl Med. 2009 Jan;50(1):72-80
pubmed: 19091902
Nucl Med Biol. 2010 Oct;37(7):845-51
pubmed: 20870160
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000 Mar;20(3):423-51
pubmed: 10724107
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Aug;213(2):W50-W56
pubmed: 30995096
IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997). 2008 Oct 1;2008:5121-5124
pubmed: 20617118
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1994;13(4):601-9
pubmed: 18218538
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Nov 21;60(22):R363-411
pubmed: 26513176
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Dec;17(12):1915-22
pubmed: 24833114
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1982;1(2):113-22
pubmed: 18238264
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Jan;34(1):126-36
pubmed: 25137726
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jul;41(10):2762-2781
pubmed: 32150317
J Nucl Med Technol. 2015 Mar;43(1):53-60
pubmed: 25613339