Final analysis of the randomized trial on imatinib as an adjuvant in localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) from the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG), the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (AGITG), UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group (FSG), Italian Sarcoma Group (ISG), and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS)


Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2021
Historique:
received: 06 03 2020
revised: 31 12 2020
accepted: 10 01 2021
pubmed: 23 1 2021
medline: 1 4 2021
entrez: 22 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In 2004, we started an intergroup randomized trial of adjuvant imatinib versus no further therapy after R0-R1 surgery in localized, high/intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients. Interim analysis results were published in 2015 upon recommendation from an independent data review committee. We report the final outcome of the study. This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial carried out at 112 hospitals in 12 countries. Patients were randomized to 2 years of imatinib, 400 mg daily, or no further therapy after surgery. The primary endpoint was imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS), while relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse-free interval (RFI), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adjusting for the interim analyses, results on IFFS were assessed on a 4.3% significance level; for the other endpoints, 5% was used. Nine hundred and eight patients were randomized between January 2005 and October 2008: 454 to imatinib and 454 to observation; 835 patients were eligible. With a median follow-up of 9.1 years, 5 (10)-year IFFS was 87% (75%) in the imatinib arm versus 83% (74%) in the control arm [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95.7% confidence interval (CI) (0.65; 1.15), P = 0.31]; RFS was 70% versus 63% at 5 years and 63% versus 61% at 10 years, [HR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.57; 0.89), P = 0.002]; OS was 93% versus 92% at 5 years and 80% versus 78% at 10 years [HR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.65; 1.21), P = 0.43]. Among 526 patients with high-risk GIST by local pathology, 10-year IFFS and RFS were 69% versus 61%, and 48% versus 43%, respectively. With 9.1 years of follow-up, a trend toward better long-term IFFS in imatinib-treated patients was observed in the high-risk subgroup. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the surrogacy value of such an endpoint is not validated, this may be seen as supporting the results reported by the Scandinavian/German trial, showing a sustained small but significant long-term OS benefit in high-risk GIST patients treated with 3 years of adjuvant imatinib.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In 2004, we started an intergroup randomized trial of adjuvant imatinib versus no further therapy after R0-R1 surgery in localized, high/intermediate-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients. Interim analysis results were published in 2015 upon recommendation from an independent data review committee. We report the final outcome of the study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial carried out at 112 hospitals in 12 countries. Patients were randomized to 2 years of imatinib, 400 mg daily, or no further therapy after surgery. The primary endpoint was imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS), while relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse-free interval (RFI), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Adjusting for the interim analyses, results on IFFS were assessed on a 4.3% significance level; for the other endpoints, 5% was used.
RESULTS
Nine hundred and eight patients were randomized between January 2005 and October 2008: 454 to imatinib and 454 to observation; 835 patients were eligible. With a median follow-up of 9.1 years, 5 (10)-year IFFS was 87% (75%) in the imatinib arm versus 83% (74%) in the control arm [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.87, 95.7% confidence interval (CI) (0.65; 1.15), P = 0.31]; RFS was 70% versus 63% at 5 years and 63% versus 61% at 10 years, [HR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.57; 0.89), P = 0.002]; OS was 93% versus 92% at 5 years and 80% versus 78% at 10 years [HR = 0.88, 95% CI (0.65; 1.21), P = 0.43]. Among 526 patients with high-risk GIST by local pathology, 10-year IFFS and RFS were 69% versus 61%, and 48% versus 43%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
With 9.1 years of follow-up, a trend toward better long-term IFFS in imatinib-treated patients was observed in the high-risk subgroup. Although the difference was not statistically significant and the surrogacy value of such an endpoint is not validated, this may be seen as supporting the results reported by the Scandinavian/German trial, showing a sustained small but significant long-term OS benefit in high-risk GIST patients treated with 3 years of adjuvant imatinib.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33482247
pii: S0923-7534(21)00012-0
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.01.004
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Antineoplastic Agents 0
Imatinib Mesylate 8A1O1M485B

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

533-541

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosure In the last 3 years, PGC had honoraria for speaker, consultancy or advisory role from Bayer, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Pfizer. At PC's institution, PC Unit received funds from Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompé, AROG Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc., Glaxo, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. At EF's institution, PC Unit received funds from Advenchen Laboratories, Amgen Dompé, AROG Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, Blueprint Medicines, Daiichi Sankyo, Deciphera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Epizyme Inc., Glaxo, Karyopharm Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. IRJ had honoraria from the Institute of Cancer Research. AI had honoraria from Epizyme, Bayer, Lilly, Roche, SpringWorks Therapeutics and non-financial support from Epizyme, Merck; AI's institution had research grants from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Chugai, MSD, BMS, Novartis, Roche. ALC had honoraria from PharmaMar, Deciphera, Lilly, Bayer. PR received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, BMS, Merck, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi for lectures and advisory boards. FD had honoraria from Bayer, Leo Pharma, PharmaMar, Lilly and funding for travel/for meetings from PharmaMar, Leo Pharma. DG: advisory role for Deciphera. JMB had honoraria for advisory board participation and expert testimony from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly and Company, Bayer and Eisai, and research grants from PharmaMar, Eisai, Immix Biopharma and Novartis. At JMB's institution, grants were received from PharmaMar, Eli Lilly and Company, Adaptimmune Therapeutics, AROG, Bayer, Eisai, Lixte, Karyopharm, Deciphera, GSK, Novartis, Blueprint, Nektar, Forma, Amgen and Daiichi Sankyo. EW received honoraria, research and travel grants from Nanobiotix, Milestone/Menarini, New Oncology, Lilly, Novartis Oncology, Roche and Bayer. J-YB had honoraria and research support from Novartis, Bayer and Deciphera. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Auteurs

P G Casali (PG)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and University of Milan, Milano, Italy; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: paolo.casali@istitutotumori.mi.it.

A Le Cesne (A)

Instituto Valenciano De Oncologia, Valencia, Spain.

A P Velasco (AP)

Adelaide Cancer Centre, Kurralta Park, and Division of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia.

D Kotasek (D)

Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Centre and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.

P Rutkowski (P)

Mannheim University Medical Center, Mannheim, Germany.

P Hohenberger (P)

Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

E Fumagalli (E)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and University of Milan, Milano, Italy; Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

I R Judson (IR)

Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.

A Italiano (A)

Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France.

H Gelderblom (H)

Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

N Penel (N)

Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.

J T Hartmann (JT)

Medizinische Universitätsklinik II, Tübingen, Germany.

F Duffaud (F)

Hôpital de La Timone, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France.

D Goldstein (D)

Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

J Martin-Broto (J)

Hospital Universitari Son Espases, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

A Gronchi (A)

Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, and University of Milan, Milano, Italy.

E Wardelmann (E)

University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.

S Marréaud (S)

EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.

J R Zalcberg (JR)

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

S Litière (S)

EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.

J-Y Blay (JY)

Department of Medicine, NetSARC and LYRIC, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH