Dexamethasone versus betamethasone for preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.


Journal

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM
ISSN: 2589-9333
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101746609

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2021
Historique:
received: 08 11 2020
revised: 08 01 2021
accepted: 12 01 2021
pubmed: 23 1 2021
medline: 25 6 2021
entrez: 22 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study aimed to evaluate the comparative clinical effectiveness and safety of dexamethasone vs betamethasone for preterm birth. The sources searched were MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform without language restrictions until October 2019 in addition to the reference lists of included studies. Field experts were also contacted. Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing any corticosteroids against each other or against placebo at any dose for preterm birth were included in the study. Three researchers independently selected and extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies by using Early Review Organizing Software and Covidence software. Random-effects pairwise meta-analysis and Bayesian network meta-analysis were performed. The primary outcomes were chorioamnionitis, endometritis or puerperal sepsis, neonatal death, respiratory distress syndrome, and neurodevelopmental disability. A total of 45 trials (11,227 women and 11,878 infants) were included in the study. No clinical or statistical difference was found between dexamethasone and betamethasone in neonatal death (odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-1.84; moderate-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability (odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.33; moderate-certainty evidence), intraventricular hemorrhage (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.78); low-certainty evidence), or birthweight (+5.29 g; 95% confidence interval, -49.79 to 58.97; high-certainty evidence). There was no statistically significant difference, but a potentially clinically important effect was found between dexamethasone and betamethasone in chorioamnionitis (odds ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.45-1.06; moderate-certainty evidence), fetal death (odds ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-2.41; low-certainty evidence), puerperal sepsis (odds ratio, 2.04; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-6.06; low-certainty evidence), and respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio, 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.11; moderate-certainty evidence). Meta-regression, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses did not reveal important changes regarding the main analysis. Corticosteroids have proven effective for most neonatal and child-relevant outcomes compared with placebo or no treatment for women at risk of preterm birth. No important difference was found on neonatal death, neurodevelopmental disability, intraventricular hemorrhage, and birthweight between corticosteroids, and there was no statistically significant difference, but a potentially important difference was found in chorioamnionitis, fetal death, endometritis or puerperal sepsis, and respiratory distress syndrome. Further research is warranted to improve the certainty of evidence and inform health policies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33482400
pii: S2589-9333(21)00007-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100312
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dexamethasone 7S5I7G3JQL
Betamethasone 9842X06Q6M

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Review Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

100312

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Agustín Ciapponi (A)

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: aciapponi@iecs.org.ar.

Karen Klein (K)

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Daniela Colaci (D)

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Fernando Althabe (F)

Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

José M Belizán (JM)

Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Allie Deegan (A)

School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY.

Areti Angeliki Veroniki (AA)

Department of Primary Education, School of Education Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece; Knowledge Translation Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Ivan D Florez (ID)

Department of Pediatrics, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH