Intra-fraction displacement of the prostate bed during post-prostatectomy radiotherapy.
IGRT
Intra-fraction motion
Post-prostatectomy
Prostate bed
Radiotherapy
Journal
Radiation oncology (London, England)
ISSN: 1748-717X
Titre abrégé: Radiat Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jan 2021
22 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
23
11
2020
accepted:
26
12
2020
entrez:
23
1
2021
pubmed:
24
1
2021
medline:
22
9
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To measure intra-fraction displacement (IFD) in post-prostatectomy patients treated with anisotropic margins and daily soft tissue matching. Pre-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired daily and post-treatment CBCTs for the first week then weekly on 46 patients. The displacement between the scans was calculated retrospectively to measure IFD of the prostate bed (PB). The marginal miss (MM) rate, and the effect of time between imaging was assessed. A total of 392 post-treatment CBCT's were reviewed from 46 patients. The absolute mean (95% CI) IFD was 1.5 mm (1.3-1.7 mm) in the AP direction, 1.0 mm (0.9-1.2 mm) SI, 0.8 mm (0.7-0.9 mm) LR, and 2.4 mm (2.2-2.5 mm) 3D displacement. IFD ≥ ± 3 mm and ≥ ± 5 mm was 24.7% and 5.4% respectively. MM of the PB was detected in 33 of 392 post-treatment CBCT (8.4%) and lymph nodes in 6 of 211 post-treatment CBCT images (2.8%). Causes of MM due to IFD included changes in the bladder (87.9%), rectum (66.7%) and buttock muscles (6%). A time ≥ 9 min between the pre and post-treatment CBCT demonstrated that movement ≥ 3 mm and 5 mm increased from 19.2 to 40.5% and 5 to 8.1% respectively. IFD during PB irradiation was typically small, but was a major contributor to an 8.4% MM rate when using daily soft tissue match and tight anisotropic margins.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
To measure intra-fraction displacement (IFD) in post-prostatectomy patients treated with anisotropic margins and daily soft tissue matching.
METHODS
METHODS
Pre-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans were acquired daily and post-treatment CBCTs for the first week then weekly on 46 patients. The displacement between the scans was calculated retrospectively to measure IFD of the prostate bed (PB). The marginal miss (MM) rate, and the effect of time between imaging was assessed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 392 post-treatment CBCT's were reviewed from 46 patients. The absolute mean (95% CI) IFD was 1.5 mm (1.3-1.7 mm) in the AP direction, 1.0 mm (0.9-1.2 mm) SI, 0.8 mm (0.7-0.9 mm) LR, and 2.4 mm (2.2-2.5 mm) 3D displacement. IFD ≥ ± 3 mm and ≥ ± 5 mm was 24.7% and 5.4% respectively. MM of the PB was detected in 33 of 392 post-treatment CBCT (8.4%) and lymph nodes in 6 of 211 post-treatment CBCT images (2.8%). Causes of MM due to IFD included changes in the bladder (87.9%), rectum (66.7%) and buttock muscles (6%). A time ≥ 9 min between the pre and post-treatment CBCT demonstrated that movement ≥ 3 mm and 5 mm increased from 19.2 to 40.5% and 5 to 8.1% respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
IFD during PB irradiation was typically small, but was a major contributor to an 8.4% MM rate when using daily soft tissue match and tight anisotropic margins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33482863
doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01743-9
pii: 10.1186/s13014-020-01743-9
pmc: PMC7821719
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
20Références
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jul;148:44-50
pubmed: 32311600
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul - Aug;9(4):208-213
pubmed: 31051281
Radiother Oncol. 2018 Feb;126(2):244-248
pubmed: 29132644
J Radiat Oncol. 2018;7(4):357-366
pubmed: 30595810
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):402-7
pubmed: 22381905
Acta Oncol. 2020 Sep 18;:1-7
pubmed: 32945701
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Jul 22;15(1):178
pubmed: 32698843
J Med Radiat Sci. 2019 Dec;66(4):259-268
pubmed: 31680490
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Jul 26;10:151
pubmed: 26209446
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec;57(6):725-32
pubmed: 24283563
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2
pubmed: 26151271
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):130-6
pubmed: 22330987