Perceptions of collaborative care team members on facilitators and barriers to care and glycosylated hemoglobin level as a diabetes quality metric at a federally qualified health center in Texas.
Journal
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA
ISSN: 1544-3450
Titre abrégé: J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101176252
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
14
09
2020
revised:
26
11
2020
accepted:
20
12
2020
pubmed:
25
1
2021
medline:
10
8
2021
entrez:
24
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Facilitators and barriers to collaborative patient care have been explored in previous studies. Few studies provide information about collaborative care team (CCT) members' roles in treating patients with diabetes and how CCT members should be evaluated for their contributions to diabetes care. To describe the roles and responsibilities of CCT members at CommUnityCare (CUC), a federally qualified health center in Central Texas; identify the facilitators and barriers affecting referrals to other CCT members within CUC; explore the facilitators and barriers to collaborative patient care at CUC; and assess CCT members' perceptions of quality metrics for diabetes care. A cross-sectional design was used. Data was collected by a survey and semistructured interviews of CCT members. The survey (32 questions) assessed roles and responsibilities, including the percentage of time spent on clinic activities, referral criteria, perceptions of quality diabetes care, and facilitators and barriers to care. The interview (32 questions) gathered a description of the CCT member's role, referral process, and ideas for diabetes quality metrics. Descriptive statistics and content analysis were used for data analysis. Twenty-two CCT members (4 diagnosticians, 4 clinical pharmacists, 4 behavioral health professionals, 4 registered dietitians, 2 community health workers, and 4 care managers) participated in this study. Co-location (54%) and professional relationships with coworkers (32%) facilitated referrals to other CCT members. Appointment availability (32%) and lack of referral criteria knowledge (27%) were barriers to other CCT member referrals. Seventy-five percent of the dietitians and care managers thought that the glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) level was a good quality metric for diabetes care, followed by 50% of the clinical pharmacists, 25% of the behavioral health counselors, and 0% of the community health workers and diagnosticians. Co-location and professional relationships facilitated referrals to CCT members, whereas lack of CCT member availability and lack of referral criteria knowledge were barriers to CCT referrals. Metrics other than the lowering of the A1C level should be further explored to assess the quality of diabetes care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33485814
pii: S1544-3191(20)30641-5
doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2020.12.020
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
S57-S67Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.