Epidemiology and antibiogram of common mastitis-causing bacteria in Beetal goats.
Beetal goats
Pattoki
antibiotic disks
common bacteria
epidemiology
isolates
mastitis
Journal
Veterinary world
ISSN: 0972-8988
Titre abrégé: Vet World
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101504872
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
24
07
2020
accepted:
02
11
2020
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mastitis has been identified as the most prevalent and economically imperative disease among dairy animals. Thus, understanding its common bacterial pathogens and risk factors is necessary to improve udder health at herd, region, or country level. However, scientific research on caprine mastitis, especially on Beetal breed, has remained to be insufficient in Pakistan. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and antibiogram assay of common mastitis-causing bacterial agents, that is, In total, 500 Beetal goats, irrespective of age and those that were not treated with any kind of antimicrobial agents during the past 120 h, were screened using California Mastitis Test in Pattoki, Kasur District, whereas epidemiological factors were recorded. The milk samples of mastitic goats were then collected and processed using standard methods. Each sample was primarily cultured on nutrient agar. Using a specific medium, each bacterial colony was separated using several streak methods. Six antibiotic disks belonging to different antibiotic groups were used for antibiogram profiling of bacterial isolates. Chi-square test was used to assess the association of baseline characteristics and mastitis occurrence. Meanwhile, multivariable logistic regression (p<0.001) was utilized to determine the risk factors associated with positive and negative dichotomous outcome of mastitis. The results revealed that the overall prevalence of goat mastitis was 309 (61.8%), in which 260 (52%) and 49 (9.8%) cases were positive for subclinical mastitis (SCM) and clinical mastitis (CM), respectively. In the area examined, cases of SCM were found to be higher compared with that of CM, and ceftiofur sodium has been identified as the preferred treatment in both clinical and subclinical forms of caprine mastitis in Beetal goats. Risk factors for mastitis that was identified in this study can form the basis for the creation of an udder health control program specific for dairy goats. We hope our findings could raise awareness of the risk factors and treatment approaches for common mastitis-causing bacterial agents.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Mastitis has been identified as the most prevalent and economically imperative disease among dairy animals. Thus, understanding its common bacterial pathogens and risk factors is necessary to improve udder health at herd, region, or country level. However, scientific research on caprine mastitis, especially on Beetal breed, has remained to be insufficient in Pakistan. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the epidemiology and antibiogram assay of common mastitis-causing bacterial agents, that is,
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In total, 500 Beetal goats, irrespective of age and those that were not treated with any kind of antimicrobial agents during the past 120 h, were screened using California Mastitis Test in Pattoki, Kasur District, whereas epidemiological factors were recorded. The milk samples of mastitic goats were then collected and processed using standard methods. Each sample was primarily cultured on nutrient agar. Using a specific medium, each bacterial colony was separated using several streak methods. Six antibiotic disks belonging to different antibiotic groups were used for antibiogram profiling of bacterial isolates. Chi-square test was used to assess the association of baseline characteristics and mastitis occurrence. Meanwhile, multivariable logistic regression (p<0.001) was utilized to determine the risk factors associated with positive and negative dichotomous outcome of mastitis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The results revealed that the overall prevalence of goat mastitis was 309 (61.8%), in which 260 (52%) and 49 (9.8%) cases were positive for subclinical mastitis (SCM) and clinical mastitis (CM), respectively.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In the area examined, cases of SCM were found to be higher compared with that of CM, and ceftiofur sodium has been identified as the preferred treatment in both clinical and subclinical forms of caprine mastitis in Beetal goats. Risk factors for mastitis that was identified in this study can form the basis for the creation of an udder health control program specific for dairy goats. We hope our findings could raise awareness of the risk factors and treatment approaches for common mastitis-causing bacterial agents.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33487976
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.2596-2607
pii: Vetworld-13-2596
pmc: PMC7811533
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2596-2607Informations de copyright
Copyright: © Jabbar, et al.
Références
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1993 Mar 15;202(6):875-81
pubmed: 8468208
Vet Rec. 2001 Jun 2;148(22):683-6
pubmed: 11425254
Vet Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):579-96
pubmed: 14556696
Ital J Food Saf. 2017 May 03;6(2):6612
pubmed: 28713793
J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2001 Jun;72(2):97-8
pubmed: 11513270
J Dairy Sci. 1998 Jul;81(7):1917-27
pubmed: 9710760
Vet World. 2019 Oct;12(10):1563-1572
pubmed: 31849417
Front Immunol. 2014 Feb 06;5:41
pubmed: 24567733
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Dec;100(12):10026-10044
pubmed: 29153153
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2001 May-Jun;114(5-6):169-72
pubmed: 11413707
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Mar;42(3):341-7
pubmed: 19731066
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2015 Feb;47(2):429-35
pubmed: 25510297
Vet Med Int. 2010;2010:517060
pubmed: 20445785
Prev Vet Med. 2017 Sep 15;145:23-31
pubmed: 28903872
Anim Biotechnol. 2011 Jul-Sep;22(3):163-9
pubmed: 21774624
Front Immunol. 2020 Feb 18;11:184
pubmed: 32132998
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Mar 1;108(4):304-12
pubmed: 23182030
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4355-64
pubmed: 19700695
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2010 Aug;42(6):1249-55
pubmed: 20373022
Vet World. 2018 Jan;11(1):20-24
pubmed: 29479152
Vaccine. 2006 May 15;24(20):4393-402
pubmed: 16580097
Vet Rec. 2018 Oct 13;183(14):449
pubmed: 30045996
J Dairy Sci. 2005 May;88(5):1694-704
pubmed: 15829660
Vet Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;34(5):689-716
pubmed: 14556701
Vet World. 2019 May;12(5):638-645
pubmed: 31327898
Vet Rec. 2007 Jan 6;160(1):19-22
pubmed: 17209091
J Hosp Infect. 2008 May;69(1):46-55
pubmed: 18358563
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1993 Nov;9(3):475-87
pubmed: 8242453
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Oct;88(10):3510-8
pubmed: 16162525
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Dec 16;3:17
pubmed: 19087314
J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2011 Dec;16(4):357-72
pubmed: 21968538
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Sep;92(9):4330-9
pubmed: 19700692
Prev Vet Med. 2016 Feb 1;124:52-7
pubmed: 26775816
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Oct;41(7):1525-30
pubmed: 19333772