Time and Emotion During Lockdown and the Covid-19 Epidemic: Determinants of Our Experience of Time?

Covid-19 boredom emotion lockdown sleep time

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 11 10 2020
accepted: 03 12 2020
entrez: 25 1 2021
pubmed: 26 1 2021
medline: 26 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To fight against the spread of the coronavirus disease, more than 3 billion people in the world have been confined indoors. Although lockdown is an efficient solution, it has had various psychological consequences that have not yet been fully measured. During the lockdown period in France (April 2020), we conducted two surveys on two large panels of participants to examine how the lockdown disrupted their relationship with time and what this change in their experiences of time means. Numerous questions were asked about the experience of time but also the nature of life during the lockdown: the emotions felt, boredom, the activities performed, sleep quality, and the daily rhythm. The participants also completed a series of self-reported scales used to assess depression, anxiety, and impulsivity. The results showed that time seemed to pass more slowly during the lockdown compared to before. This feeling of a slowing down of time has little to do with living conditions during the lockdown and individual psychological characteristics. The main predictor of this time experience was boredom and partly mediated by the lack of activity. The feeling of being less happy and the presence of sleep disturbance also explained this specific experience of time albeit to a lesser extent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33488485
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.616169
pmc: PMC7816521
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

616169

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Martinelli, Gil, Belletier, Chevalère, Dezecache, Huguet and Droit-Volet.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

PLoS One. 2019 Oct 18;14(10):e0223567
pubmed: 31626645
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2020 Apr;205:103061
pubmed: 32203734
J Psychosom Res. 1994 Jan;38(1):23-32
pubmed: 8126686
Br J Clin Psychol. 1992 Sep;31(3):301-6
pubmed: 1393159
Can J Occup Ther. 2004 Feb;71(1):24-35
pubmed: 15015898
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):130-41
pubmed: 20163781
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 07;3:16
pubmed: 22347202
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Jun;50(7):1211-21
pubmed: 22245006
Psych J. 2019 Mar;8(1):51-65
pubmed: 30740922
Motiv Emot. 2018;42(6):931-946
pubmed: 30416228
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71
pubmed: 13688369
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0236465
pubmed: 32776990
Psychopathology. 2017;50(2):125-140
pubmed: 27978520
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:165-71
pubmed: 26115594
J Sleep Res. 2020 Aug;29(4):e13074
pubmed: 32410272
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Mar;34(3):353-65
pubmed: 18272804
J Pers. 1977 Jun;45(2):237-50
pubmed: 881637
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Feb;173:116-121
pubmed: 28040645
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Sep;7(5):482-95
pubmed: 26168505
Hum Factors. 1981 Jun;23(3):329-40
pubmed: 7016721
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 3;13(4):e0195397
pubmed: 29614116
Emotion. 2001 Sep;1(3):300-19
pubmed: 12934688
Int J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;117(3):359-68
pubmed: 17365120
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2004 Mar;109(3):222-9
pubmed: 14984395
Multivariate Behav Res. 2018 May-Jun;53(3):375-402
pubmed: 29624079
Psychol Rep. 2005 Dec;97(3):921-35
pubmed: 16512313
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 14;5:1586
pubmed: 25642205
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Aug;85(2):348-62
pubmed: 12916575
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 6;15(7):e0235871
pubmed: 32628735
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2015 Mar;156:77-82
pubmed: 25701720
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:66
pubmed: 29515385
Sex Roles. 2018 Jun;78(11-12):715-730
pubmed: 30013287
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 19;7:176
pubmed: 26925006
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:917
pubmed: 25191296

Auteurs

Natalia Martinelli (N)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Sandrine Gil (S)

Université de Poitiers et CNRS, UMR7295 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage, Poitiers, France.

Clément Belletier (C)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Johann Chevalère (J)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Guillaume Dezecache (G)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Pascal Huguet (P)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Sylvie Droit-Volet (S)

Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LAPSCO, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.

Classifications MeSH