The social function of the feeling and expression of guilt.
emotion
facial expression
friendship
guilt
morality
social consequences
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Dec 2020
Historique:
received:
22
05
2020
accepted:
12
11
2020
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Humans are uniquely cooperative and form crucial short- and long-term social bonds between individuals that ultimately shape human societies. The need for such intense cooperation may have provided a particularly powerful selection pressure on the emotional and communicative behaviours regulating cooperative processes, such as guilt. Guilt is a social, other-oriented moral emotion that promotes relationship repair and pro-sociality. For example, people can be more lenient towards wrongdoers who display guilt than towards those who do not. Here, we examined the social consequences of guilt in a novel experimental setting with pairs of friends differing in relationship quality. Pairs of participants took part in a cooperative game with a mutual goal. We then induced guilt in one of the participants and informed the other participant of their partner's wrongdoing. We examined the outcome using a dictator game to see how they split a joint reward. We found that guilty people were motivated to repair wrongdoing regardless of friendship. Observing guilt in others led to a punishment effect and a victim of wrongdoing punished close friends who appeared guilty more so than acquaintances. We suggest, therefore, that guilt has a stronger function between close friends as the costs of relationship breakdown are greater. Relationship context, therefore, is crucial to the functional relevance of moral emotions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33489253
doi: 10.1098/rsos.200617
pii: rsos200617
pmc: PMC7813227
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5226050']
Dryad
['10.5061/dryad.tmpg4f4vw']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
200617Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
We declare we have no competing interests.
Références
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Oct;17:67-73
pubmed: 28950975
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jun;145(6):708-30
pubmed: 27077757
Cogn Emot. 2003 May;17(3):429-453
pubmed: 29715746
Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):565-72
pubmed: 22082035
Science. 1961 Nov 10;134(3489):1501-6
pubmed: 14471768
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 24;15(4):e0231756
pubmed: 32330158
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2651-61
pubmed: 20679109
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 22;273(1589):1013-21
pubmed: 16627288
Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:345-72
pubmed: 16953797
J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17-52
pubmed: 5875340
Science. 2010 Mar 19;327(5972):1480-4
pubmed: 20299588
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Apr;37(4):451-63
pubmed: 21357754
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70
pubmed: 3397865
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32
pubmed: 20528068
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):244-256
pubmed: 26691600
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:153-77
pubmed: 21740224
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2014 Mar;17(1):19-40
pubmed: 23712881
Psychol Bull. 1994 Mar;115(2):243-67
pubmed: 8165271
J Theor Biol. 2001 Jan 7;208(1):79-89
pubmed: 11162054
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2019 Jul;20(1):1-68
pubmed: 31313636
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 May;100(5):947-66
pubmed: 21517196
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Sep 12;365(1553):2635-50
pubmed: 20679108
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 May;38(5):607-18
pubmed: 22337764