Identification of Patients with Pentosan Polysulfate Sodium-Associated Maculopathy through Screening of the Electronic Medical Record at an Academic Center.
Journal
Journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 2090-004X
Titre abrégé: J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101524199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2020
2020
Historique:
received:
12
09
2020
revised:
07
11
2020
accepted:
28
11
2020
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This chart review of a quaternary academic medical center electronic medical record (EMR) aimed to identify patients at risk of development of maculopathy with exposure to pentosan polysulfate sodium (PPS). A review of electronic medical records of a quaternary medical center of patients with either documented exposure to PPS or diagnosis of interstitial cystitis (IC) from 2007 to 2019 was performed for retinal imaging and visual acuity; the study was conducted in August of 2019. 216 charts were included for analysis, of which 96 had documented eye exams and 24 had retinal imaging done. We identified three patients with maculopathy in the context of long-term exposure to PPS via chart review, and one additional patient was identified by referral. The median PPS exposure duration was 11 years (range 7 to 19 years). Median logMAR BCVA OD 0.6 range was 0.0-1.9 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/80 range (20/20-20/1600)) and OS 0.7 range was 0.1-1.9 (approximate Snellen equivalent 20/100 range (20/25-20/1600)). Ultrawidefield color fundus imaging and fundus autofluorescence revealed findings of pigmentary changes and patchy macular atrophy. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) demonstrated outer retinal thinning and increased choroidal transmission coincident with areas of atrophy seen on fundus imaging. Less than half of patients at risk for development of maculopathy due to exposure to PPS had received eye examinations, suggesting that those at risk are not receiving adequate screening. We found two patients with PPS maculopathy who had relatively preserved central vision, one patient with bitemporal vision loss, and one patient who developed vision loss in both eyes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33489347
doi: 10.1155/2020/8866961
pmc: PMC7803106
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
8866961Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : K08 EY027463
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Kendall Higgins et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No conflicts of interest exist for any author.
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992 Nov 18;84(22):1716-24
pubmed: 1279186
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007 Feb;292(2):H743-50
pubmed: 17071728
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019 Oct 1;50(10):656-659
pubmed: 31671200
Ophthalmology. 2020 Apr;127(4):535-543
pubmed: 31899034
Ophthalmology. 2019 Jul;126(7):e51
pubmed: 31229012
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Dec 13;54(14):ORSF68-80
pubmed: 24335072
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):894-900
pubmed: 32644147
J Urol. 2002 Jul;168(1):289-92
pubmed: 12050558
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 May;32(6):1770-8
pubmed: 2032799
Ophthalmology. 2018 Nov;125(11):1793-1802
pubmed: 29801663
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;104(8):1093-1097
pubmed: 31694837
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 5;:
pubmed: 31486843
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010 Jan;29(1):1-18
pubmed: 19747980
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30365
pubmed: 22291943
Int J Dev Biol. 1996 Oct;40(5):965-71
pubmed: 8946244
Drugs. 2006;66(6):821-35
pubmed: 16706553