Mapping of the Inferior Glenohumeral Ligament for Suture Pullout Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.
IGHL
biomechanics
inferior glenohumeral ligament
instability
rehabilitation
shoulder
suture pullout
Journal
Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine
ISSN: 2325-9671
Titre abrégé: Orthop J Sports Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101620522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2021
Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
09
06
2020
accepted:
24
06
2020
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Suture pullout during rehabilitation may result in loss of tension in the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) and contribute to recurrent instability after capsular plication, performed with or without labral repair. To date, the suture pullout strength in the IGHL is not well-documented. This may contribute to recurrent instability. A cadaveric biomechanical study was designed to investigate the suture pullout strength of sutures in the IGHL. We hypothesized that there would be no significant variability of suture pullout strength between specimens and zones. Additionally, we sought to determine the impact of early mobilization on sutures in the IGHL at time zero. We hypothesized that capsular plication sutures would fail under low load. Descriptive laboratory study. Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were dissected to isolate the IGHL complex, which was then divided into 18 zones. Sutures in these zones were attached to a linear actuator, and the resistance to suture pullout was recorded. A suture pullout strength map of the IGHL was constructed. These loads were used to calculate the load applied at the hand that would initiate suture pullout in the IGHL. Mean suture pullout strength for all specimens was 61.6 ± 26.1 N. The maximum load found to cause suture pullout through tissue was found to be low, regardless of zone of the IGHL. Calculations suggest that an external rotation force applied to the hand of only 9.6 N may be sufficient to tear capsular sutures at time zero. This study did not provide clear evidence of desirable locations for fixation in the IGHL. However, given the low magnitude of failure loads, the results suggest the timetable for initiation of range-of-motion exercises should be reconsidered to prevent suture pullout through the IGHL. From this biomechanical study, the magnitude of force required to cause suture pullout through the IGHL is met or surpassed by normal postoperative early range-of-motion protocols.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Suture pullout during rehabilitation may result in loss of tension in the inferior glenohumeral ligament (IGHL) and contribute to recurrent instability after capsular plication, performed with or without labral repair. To date, the suture pullout strength in the IGHL is not well-documented. This may contribute to recurrent instability.
PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS
OBJECTIVE
A cadaveric biomechanical study was designed to investigate the suture pullout strength of sutures in the IGHL. We hypothesized that there would be no significant variability of suture pullout strength between specimens and zones. Additionally, we sought to determine the impact of early mobilization on sutures in the IGHL at time zero. We hypothesized that capsular plication sutures would fail under low load.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
Descriptive laboratory study.
METHODS
METHODS
Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were dissected to isolate the IGHL complex, which was then divided into 18 zones. Sutures in these zones were attached to a linear actuator, and the resistance to suture pullout was recorded. A suture pullout strength map of the IGHL was constructed. These loads were used to calculate the load applied at the hand that would initiate suture pullout in the IGHL.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Mean suture pullout strength for all specimens was 61.6 ± 26.1 N. The maximum load found to cause suture pullout through tissue was found to be low, regardless of zone of the IGHL. Calculations suggest that an external rotation force applied to the hand of only 9.6 N may be sufficient to tear capsular sutures at time zero.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study did not provide clear evidence of desirable locations for fixation in the IGHL. However, given the low magnitude of failure loads, the results suggest the timetable for initiation of range-of-motion exercises should be reconsidered to prevent suture pullout through the IGHL.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
From this biomechanical study, the magnitude of force required to cause suture pullout through the IGHL is met or surpassed by normal postoperative early range-of-motion protocols.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33490294
doi: 10.1177/2325967120969640
pii: 10.1177_2325967120969640
pmc: PMC7804356
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2325967120969640Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
One or more of the authors has declared the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: S.R. has received research support from Mathys Orthopaedics. D.B. has received research support from Smith & Nephew; consulting fees and speaking fees from Mathys Orthopaedics, Rotation Medical, Smith & Nephew, Wright Medical, and Zimmer Biomet; and royalties from Allegra Orthopaedics; and has stock/stock options in Allegra Orthopaedics. AOSSM checks author disclosures against the Open Payments Database (OPD). AOSSM has not conducted an independent investigation on the OPD and disclaims any liability or responsibility relating thereto.
Références
Am J Sports Med. 1990 Sep-Oct;18(5):449-56
pubmed: 2252083
Arthroscopy. 1996 Dec;12(6):687-93
pubmed: 9115556
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1312-22
pubmed: 15930542
Emerg Radiol. 2017 Feb;24(1):65-71
pubmed: 27530740
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1755-63
pubmed: 16882898
J Orthop Res. 1992 Mar;10(2):187-97
pubmed: 1740736
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Dec;19(12):758-67
pubmed: 22134208
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):48-55
pubmed: 12533571
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jul;38(7):1405-12
pubmed: 20360604
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):249-54
pubmed: 8872921
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Aug;25(6):975-85
pubmed: 25638224
Arthroscopy. 2019 Jun;35(6):1917-1926.e2
pubmed: 30979625
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;6(5):473-9
pubmed: 9356937
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 May;81(3):406-13
pubmed: 10872356
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1999 Aug;14(7):471-6
pubmed: 10521630
Am J Sports Med. 1990 Jan-Feb;18(1):20-4
pubmed: 2301686
Sports Health. 2018 May/Jun;10(3):250-258
pubmed: 29298132
Am J Sports Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;26(6):831-5
pubmed: 9850787
Int J Shoulder Surg. 2014 Jul;8(3):81-5
pubmed: 25258499
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Jan;81(1):93-6
pubmed: 10068012
Am J Sports Med. 1994 Sep-Oct;22(5):715-8
pubmed: 7810799
Arthroscopy. 2019 Oct;35(10):2795-2800
pubmed: 31395394
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jul;476(7):1526-1536
pubmed: 29851867
Am J Sports Med. 1993 Nov-Dec;21(6):874-9
pubmed: 8291643
Am J Sports Med. 2012 Jul;40(7):1635-40
pubmed: 22679296
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 Mar;40(3):155-68
pubmed: 20195022
Arthroscopy. 2018 Mar;34(3):784-792
pubmed: 29225018
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Dec;10(4):442-451
pubmed: 28971317
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Apr;74(4):491-500
pubmed: 1583043
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013 Jul;21(7):1587-92
pubmed: 22706969
Arthroscopy. 2016 Nov;32(11):2288-2294
pubmed: 27161509