Influence of intra- and interfraction motion on planning target volume margin in liver stereotactic body radiation therapy using breath hold.
Journal
Advances in radiation oncology
ISSN: 2452-1094
Titre abrégé: Adv Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101677247
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
30
06
2020
revised:
13
10
2020
accepted:
29
10
2020
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study aimed to investigate intra- and interfraction motion during liver stereotactic body radiation therapy for the purpose of planning target volume (PTV) margin estimation, comparing deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and deep expiration breath hold (DEBH). Pre- and posttreatment kV cone beam computed tomography (CT) images were acquired for patients with liver cancer who were treated using stereotactic body radiation therapy with DIBH or DEBH. A total of 188 images were analyzed from 18 patients. Positioning errors were determined based on a comparison with planning CT images and matching to the liver. Treatment did not proceed until errors were ≤3 mm. Standard deviations of random and systematic errors resulting from this image matching process were used to calculate PTV margin estimates. DIBH errors are generally larger than DEBH errors, especially in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions. Posttreatment errors tend to be larger than pretreatment errors, especially for DIBH. Standard deviations of random errors are larger than those of systematic errors. Considering both pre- and posttreatment cone beam CT images, PTV margins for DIBH and DEBH are estimated as anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, right-left = (5.7, 6.3, 3.0) mm and (3.1, 3.4, 2.8) mm, respectively. This study suggests that DEBH results in more reproducible target positioning, which could in turn justify the use of smaller PTV margins.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33490733
doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.023
pii: S2452-1094(20)30313-4
pmc: PMC7809510
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100610Informations de copyright
© 2020 The Author(s).
Références
Radiat Oncol. 2014 Jan 09;9:11
pubmed: 24401365
J Cancer. 2015 Aug 01;6(11):1099-104
pubmed: 26516357
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 1;27(10):1572-8
pubmed: 19255321
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Sep 1;51(1):267-70
pubmed: 11516877
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020 Jul;21(7):77-83
pubmed: 32337841
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Sep;104(3):379-85
pubmed: 22260848
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004 Jan;14(1):52-64
pubmed: 14752733
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 1;67(3):793-8
pubmed: 17197128
Med Phys. 2008 Jan;35(1):310-7
pubmed: 18293586
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003 May 1;56(1):221-8
pubmed: 12694842
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Jul 1;47(4):1121-35
pubmed: 10863086
Phys Med Biol. 1987 Mar;32(3):327-34
pubmed: 3575415
Acta Oncol. 2006;45(7):856-64
pubmed: 16982550
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Jul 15;62(4):1247-52
pubmed: 15990028
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Nov;45(17):2947-59
pubmed: 19773153