Lansoprazole for persistent throat symptoms in secondary care: the TOPPITS RCT.
EAR NOSE AND THROAT
EXTRA OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX
LARYNGOPHARYNGEAL REFLUX
PROTON PUMP INHIBITOR
REFLUX SYMPTOM INDEX
Journal
Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)
ISSN: 2046-4924
Titre abrégé: Health Technol Assess
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9706284
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2021
01 2021
Historique:
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Persistent throat symptoms are commonly attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. Despite a limited evidence base, these symptoms are increasingly being treated in primary care with proton pump inhibitors. To assess the value of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with persistent throat symptoms. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised Phase III trial. This was a multicentre UK trial in eight UK ear, nose and throat departments. A total of 346 participants aged ≥ 18 years with persistent throat symptoms and a Reflux Symptom Index score of ≥ 10, exclusive of the dyspepsia item, were recruited. Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo for 16 weeks. Symptomatic response (i.e. total Reflux Symptom Index score after 16 weeks of therapy). A total of 1427 patients were screened and 346 were randomised. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 13.7 years, range 20-84 years); 150 (43%) participants were male and 196 (57%) were female; 184 (53%) participants had a mild Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item and 162 (47%) had a severe Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item. A total of 172 patients were randomised to lansoprazole and 174 were randomised to placebo. A total of 267 participants completed the primary end-point visit (lansoprazole, Ninety-five (43%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range (< 12) at 16 weeks: 42 (41%) in the lansoprazole group and 53 (45%) in the placebo group. A total of 226 participants completed the end-of-trial follow-up visit (lansoprazole, Drop-out rate and compliance are issues in pragmatic clinical trials. The Trial Of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms (TOPPITS) aimed to detect clinically relevant difference with 90% power. The 346 randomised participants reduced to 283 at the primary end point; 267 completed the primary outcome measure, 220 within the protocol time scale. Despite this, the powers to detect the clinically relevant difference in Reflux Symptom Index score at 16 weeks were 82% (compliant comparison) and 89% (pragmatic comparison). The lack of difference between lansoprazole and placebo is generalisable across NHS clinics. Participants on lansoprazole did not report significantly better outcomes than participants on placebo on any of the three patient-reported outcome tools (Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life). This multicentre, pragmatic, powered, definitive Phase III trial found no evidence of benefit for patients by treating persistent throat symptoms with lansoprazole. Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT number 2013-004249-17. This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in One of the commonest reasons for patients attending hospital throat or voice clinics is persistent throat symptoms, which include a feeling of a lump in the throat, a cough or a hoarse voice. Over time, more of these patients are being treated with proton pump inhibitors to suppress stomach acid in the belief that stomach acid entering the throat causes the symptoms, but there is little evidence that these medications work. The aim of this study is to explore whether or not having a 16-week course of proton pump inhibitors has any impact on throat symptoms. We also tested the usefulness of three different questionnaires in measuring throat symptoms, explored side effects and whether or not patients adhere to treatment, and measured patients’ quality of life. Patients with persistent (lasting for more than 6 weeks) throat symptoms who agreed to participate were randomised to receive either the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole or a placebo. Participants took lansoprazole or placebo for 16 weeks. Symptoms and quality of life were measured before patients were randomised and at 4 and 12 months after randomisation. The total number of participants was 346. The mean Reflux Symptom Index outcome score (higher scores meaning worse symptoms) was 22 before the 4-month course of capsules, 16 after 4 months and 15 after 12 months. Participant-reported throat symptoms and quality of life in all participants improved over the 12 months of the study. There was no difference in the symptom improvement experienced by proton pump inhibitor and placebo participants. This study shows that proton pump inhibitors do not benefit patients with persistent throat symptoms. Future research should focus on other available therapies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Persistent throat symptoms are commonly attributed to 'laryngopharyngeal reflux'. Despite a limited evidence base, these symptoms are increasingly being treated in primary care with proton pump inhibitors.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the value of proton pump inhibitor therapy in patients with persistent throat symptoms.
DESIGN
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised Phase III trial.
SETTING
This was a multicentre UK trial in eight UK ear, nose and throat departments.
PARTICIPANTS
A total of 346 participants aged ≥ 18 years with persistent throat symptoms and a Reflux Symptom Index score of ≥ 10, exclusive of the dyspepsia item, were recruited.
INTERVENTION
Random allocation (1 : 1 ratio) to either 30 mg of lansoprazole twice daily or matched placebo for 16 weeks.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
Symptomatic response (i.e. total Reflux Symptom Index score after 16 weeks of therapy).
RESULTS
A total of 1427 patients were screened and 346 were randomised. The mean age was 52 years (standard deviation 13.7 years, range 20-84 years); 150 (43%) participants were male and 196 (57%) were female; 184 (53%) participants had a mild Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item and 162 (47%) had a severe Reflux Symptom Index minus the heartburn/dyspepsia item. A total of 172 patients were randomised to lansoprazole and 174 were randomised to placebo.
MAIN OUTCOMES
A total of 267 participants completed the primary end-point visit (lansoprazole,
SECONDARY OUTCOMES
Ninety-five (43%) participants achieved a Reflux Symptom Index score in the normal range (< 12) at 16 weeks: 42 (41%) in the lansoprazole group and 53 (45%) in the placebo group. A total of 226 participants completed the end-of-trial follow-up visit (lansoprazole,
LIMITATIONS
Drop-out rate and compliance are issues in pragmatic clinical trials. The Trial Of Proton Pump Inhibitors in Throat Symptoms (TOPPITS) aimed to detect clinically relevant difference with 90% power. The 346 randomised participants reduced to 283 at the primary end point; 267 completed the primary outcome measure, 220 within the protocol time scale. Despite this, the powers to detect the clinically relevant difference in Reflux Symptom Index score at 16 weeks were 82% (compliant comparison) and 89% (pragmatic comparison). The lack of difference between lansoprazole and placebo is generalisable across NHS clinics.
CONCLUSIONS
Participants on lansoprazole did not report significantly better outcomes than participants on placebo on any of the three patient-reported outcome tools (Reflux Symptom Index, Comprehensive Reflux Symptom Score and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux - Health Related Quality of Life). This multicentre, pragmatic, powered, definitive Phase III trial found no evidence of benefit for patients by treating persistent throat symptoms with lansoprazole.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN38578686 and EudraCT number 2013-004249-17.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in
BACKGROUND
One of the commonest reasons for patients attending hospital throat or voice clinics is persistent throat symptoms, which include a feeling of a lump in the throat, a cough or a hoarse voice. Over time, more of these patients are being treated with proton pump inhibitors to suppress stomach acid in the belief that stomach acid entering the throat causes the symptoms, but there is little evidence that these medications work.
STUDY AIM
The aim of this study is to explore whether or not having a 16-week course of proton pump inhibitors has any impact on throat symptoms. We also tested the usefulness of three different questionnaires in measuring throat symptoms, explored side effects and whether or not patients adhere to treatment, and measured patients’ quality of life.
METHODS
Patients with persistent (lasting for more than 6 weeks) throat symptoms who agreed to participate were randomised to receive either the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole or a placebo. Participants took lansoprazole or placebo for 16 weeks. Symptoms and quality of life were measured before patients were randomised and at 4 and 12 months after randomisation.
RESULTS
The total number of participants was 346. The mean Reflux Symptom Index outcome score (higher scores meaning worse symptoms) was 22 before the 4-month course of capsules, 16 after 4 months and 15 after 12 months. Participant-reported throat symptoms and quality of life in all participants improved over the 12 months of the study. There was no difference in the symptom improvement experienced by proton pump inhibitor and placebo participants.
CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that proton pump inhibitors do not benefit patients with persistent throat symptoms. Future research should focus on other available therapies.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
One of the commonest reasons for patients attending hospital throat or voice clinics is persistent throat symptoms, which include a feeling of a lump in the throat, a cough or a hoarse voice. Over time, more of these patients are being treated with proton pump inhibitors to suppress stomach acid in the belief that stomach acid entering the throat causes the symptoms, but there is little evidence that these medications work.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33492208
doi: 10.3310/hta25030
pmc: PMC7869007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Lansoprazole
0K5C5T2QPG
Banques de données
ISRCTN
['ISRCTN38578686']
EudraCT
['2013-004249-17']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-118Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 12/01/04
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 Jul 4;49(7):
pubmed: 27383119
Psychosom Med. 2009 Nov;71(9):1026-31
pubmed: 19834050
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 Jul;121(7):431-4
pubmed: 22844861
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Mar;140(3):192-6
pubmed: 24481258
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep 1;143(9):870-875
pubmed: 28617903
J Dig Dis. 2016 May;17(5):319-24
pubmed: 27125332
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jul;32(7):1336-1340
pubmed: 28052406
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jul;32(2):296-302
pubmed: 20456301
Laryngoscope. 2001 Jun;111(6):979-81
pubmed: 11404607
J Laryngol Otol. 1972 Apr;86(4):335-42
pubmed: 5021719
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Jan;122(1):46-51
pubmed: 17498325
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):95-100
pubmed: 24492407
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2015 Dec 21;15:7
pubmed: 26696776
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Oct;111(10):1382-1388
pubmed: 27481312
Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Oct;59(10):2488-96
pubmed: 24811245
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):414-20
pubmed: 18722223
Australas Med J. 2014 Nov 30;7(11):465-70
pubmed: 25550719
J Voice. 2014 Jul;28(4):492-500
pubmed: 24629640
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;19(3):150-4
pubmed: 21499101
Digestion. 2018;97(2):146-153
pubmed: 29310115
Dig Dis Sci. 2001 Jul;46(7):1540-9
pubmed: 11478508
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 May;28(5):680-6
pubmed: 26744292
Laryngoscope. 2005 Jun;115(6):1042-5
pubmed: 15933517
JAMA. 2004 Oct 27;292(16):1955-60
pubmed: 15507580
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(10):1132-40
pubmed: 20199498
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2646-54
pubmed: 17037995
Dig Liver Dis. 2017 Jul;49(7):757-763
pubmed: 28258931
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70
pubmed: 22969200
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Apr;50(4):295-300
pubmed: 25906028
Trials. 2016 Apr 01;17:175
pubmed: 27036555
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Feb;14(2):175-82.e1-3
pubmed: 25956834
Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Aug;12(8):472-85
pubmed: 26194942
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6):921-6
pubmed: 21493299
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec;155(6):1014-1020
pubmed: 27554506
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Feb;266(2):243-51
pubmed: 18506466
Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1987;140:29-31
pubmed: 3328282
Gut. 2019 Apr;68(4):762-764
pubmed: 29615489
Laryngoscope. 2015 Feb;125(2):424-30
pubmed: 25267601
Laryngoscope. 2006 Feb;116(2):254-60
pubmed: 16467715
J Voice. 2015 Sep;29(5):572-7
pubmed: 26118936
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 4;7(6):e015735
pubmed: 28676480
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):356-61
pubmed: 25609349
Ann Gastroenterol. 2017;30(6):585-591
pubmed: 29118552
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 May;188(2):541-544
pubmed: 30136221
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jun;126(6):649-52
pubmed: 12087332
Psychosomatics. 1995 Nov-Dec;36(6):570-7
pubmed: 7501789
Gastroenterology. 2009 Jul;137(1):80-7, 87.e1
pubmed: 19362552
Int J Cancer. 2018 Sep 15;143(6):1315-1326
pubmed: 29658114
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Oct;269(10):2219-25
pubmed: 22576243
Digestion. 2009;79(1):52-7
pubmed: 19252403
Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2256-61
pubmed: 16369176
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995 Jul;104(7):550-5
pubmed: 7598368
Chest. 2007 Nov;132(5):1548-56
pubmed: 17908704
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 May-Jun;50(5):e50-4
pubmed: 26196474
Arch Intern Med. 2010 May 10;170(9):765-71
pubmed: 20458083
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Jan 1;126(1):46-8
pubmed: 7059872
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Feb;13(2):251-259.e1
pubmed: 24997325
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;136(2):205-10
pubmed: 17275540
Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun;109(6):789-94
pubmed: 24896751
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(6):695-701
pubmed: 18201449
J Voice. 2013 Jan;27(1):84-9
pubmed: 23159026
Value Health. 2003 Sep-Oct;6(5):560-5
pubmed: 14627062
Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Aug;36(4):388-92
pubmed: 21848554
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 May;264(5):513-7
pubmed: 17404773
Laryngoscope. 2001 Aug;111(8):1313-7
pubmed: 11568561
Eur J Gen Pract. 2018 Dec;24(1):32-38
pubmed: 29168409
Laryngoscope. 2006 Jan;116(1):144-8
pubmed: 16481828
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Aug;264(8):907-11
pubmed: 17436007
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 Mar;270(3):995-9
pubmed: 23143641
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009;34(1):32-5
pubmed: 19214865
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2008 Feb;4(1):225-33
pubmed: 18728712
Heart Lung Circ. 2018 Apr;27(4):443-450
pubmed: 29233498
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2007 Oct;116(10):717-22
pubmed: 17987776
J Otolaryngol. 1990 Apr;19(2):103-9
pubmed: 2190005
Dig Dis. 2018;36(4):257-263
pubmed: 29791895
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Sep;8(9):770-6
pubmed: 20303417
Respir Med. 2015 Aug;109(8):963-9
pubmed: 26044812
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):863-9
pubmed: 21221621
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jun;158(6):1072-1078
pubmed: 29462564
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Nov;273(11):3795-3801
pubmed: 27312992
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Oct 1;31(10):
pubmed: 29534167
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Dec;130(12):1125-1129
pubmed: 27786147
J Voice. 2002 Jun;16(2):274-7
pubmed: 12150380
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1291-5
pubmed: 24201320
Laryngoscope. 2001 Dec;111(12):2147-51
pubmed: 11802014
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1513-1524
pubmed: 29582172
Dig Dis. 2009;27(1):68-73
pubmed: 19439964
Am J Med. 2003 Aug 18;115 Suppl 3A:97S-104S
pubmed: 12928083
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104 Suppl 2:S27-32
pubmed: 19262544
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1994 Feb;19(1):55-60
pubmed: 8174303
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2012 May;24(5):432-7, e210
pubmed: 22276941
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Oct;275(10):2515-2521
pubmed: 30062580
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb 15;25(4):385-92
pubmed: 17269993
Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016 Sep;4(3):157-167
pubmed: 28163985
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Jun;43(3):854-860
pubmed: 29327493
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Feb 08;4:46
pubmed: 29456870
Int J Psychiatry Med. 1999;29(3):337-45
pubmed: 10642907
J Psychosom Res. 1995 Feb;39(2):203-13
pubmed: 7595878
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Apr;131(4):315-20
pubmed: 15837899
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2018 Jul-Aug;71(4):267-271
pubmed: 30186000
Cleve Clin J Med. 2011 Jan;78(1):39-49
pubmed: 21199906
Gut. 2018 Jan;67(1):28-35
pubmed: 29089382
Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Jun;49(443):451-3
pubmed: 10562744
Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Feb;37(1):9-16
pubmed: 22433134
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jun;29(11):997-1001
pubmed: 26536702
JAMA. 2017 Dec 19;318(23):2337-2343
pubmed: 29260229
Surgeon. 2017 Aug;15(4):183-185
pubmed: 28601343
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):455-9
pubmed: 19793278
Laryngoscope. 2013 Apr;123(4):985-91
pubmed: 23208751
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;61(8):1021-8
pubmed: 19703345
Dig Liver Dis. 2016 Sep;48(9):1012-7
pubmed: 27378704
Arch Otolaryngol. 1982 Nov;108(11):740-4
pubmed: 7138370
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2017 Dec;109(12):850-855
pubmed: 29082739
Med Sci Monit. 2010 Oct;16(10):CR480-7
pubmed: 20885352
J Voice. 2007 Jan;21(1):92-100
pubmed: 16546351
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Oct;51(9):769-776
pubmed: 28858946
Laryngoscope. 2007 Mar;117(3):480-4
pubmed: 17334308
Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Feb;29(1):47-50
pubmed: 14961851
Clin Otolaryngol. 2006 Feb;31(1):20-4; discussion 24
pubmed: 16441796
J Laryngol Otol. 1983 Jul;97(7):607-18
pubmed: 6875362
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Feb;148(2):261-6
pubmed: 23124925
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug 6;8(3):180-185
pubmed: 28828196
Consult Pharm. 2018 Sep 1;33(9):497-503
pubmed: 30185290
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Apr;269(4):1189-94
pubmed: 22207531