Higher anticoagulation targets and risk of thrombotic events in severe COVID-19 patients: bi-center cohort study.
Anticoagulation
COVID-19
Coagulopathy
Pulmonary embolism
SARS-CoV-2
Thrombosis
Journal
Annals of intensive care
ISSN: 2110-5820
Titre abrégé: Ann Intensive Care
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101562873
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 Jan 2021
25 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
14
11
2020
accepted:
16
01
2021
entrez:
25
1
2021
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
26
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients is a highly debated issue. We aimed to compare the occurrence of thrombotic/ischemic events in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with either prophylactic or therapeutic dosage of heparin. All patients referred for COVID-19 ARDS in two intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital were included in our cohort study. Patients were compared according to their anticoagulant treatment to evaluate the risk/benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected. One hundred and seventy-nine patients (73% men) were analyzed: 108 in prophylactic group and 71 in therapeutic group. Median age and SAPS II were 62 [IQR 51; 70] years and 47 [IQR 37; 63] points. ICU mortality rate was 17.3%. Fifty-seven patients developed clinically relevant thrombotic complications during their ICU stay, less frequently in therapeutic group (adjusted OR 0.38 [0.14-0.94], p = 0.04). The occurrences of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and ischemic stroke were significantly lower in the therapeutic group (respective adjusted OR for PE: 0.19 [0.03-0.81]; DVT: 0.13 [0.01-0.89], stroke: 0.06 [0-0.68], all p < 0.05). The occurrence of bleeding complications was not significantly different between groups, neither were ICU length of stay or mortality rate. D-dimer levels were significantly lower during ICU stay, and aPTT ratio was more prolonged in the therapeutic group (p < 0.05). Increasing the anticoagulation of severe COVID-19 patients to a therapeutic level might decrease thrombotic complications without increasing their bleeding risk.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Thromboprophylaxis of COVID-19 patients is a highly debated issue. We aimed to compare the occurrence of thrombotic/ischemic events in COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with either prophylactic or therapeutic dosage of heparin. All patients referred for COVID-19 ARDS in two intensive care units (ICUs) from two centers of a French tertiary hospital were included in our cohort study. Patients were compared according to their anticoagulant treatment to evaluate the risk/benefit of prophylactic anticoagulation versus therapeutic anticoagulation. Medical history, symptoms, biological data and imaging were prospectively collected.
RESULTS
RESULTS
One hundred and seventy-nine patients (73% men) were analyzed: 108 in prophylactic group and 71 in therapeutic group. Median age and SAPS II were 62 [IQR 51; 70] years and 47 [IQR 37; 63] points. ICU mortality rate was 17.3%. Fifty-seven patients developed clinically relevant thrombotic complications during their ICU stay, less frequently in therapeutic group (adjusted OR 0.38 [0.14-0.94], p = 0.04). The occurrences of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and ischemic stroke were significantly lower in the therapeutic group (respective adjusted OR for PE: 0.19 [0.03-0.81]; DVT: 0.13 [0.01-0.89], stroke: 0.06 [0-0.68], all p < 0.05). The occurrence of bleeding complications was not significantly different between groups, neither were ICU length of stay or mortality rate. D-dimer levels were significantly lower during ICU stay, and aPTT ratio was more prolonged in the therapeutic group (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Increasing the anticoagulation of severe COVID-19 patients to a therapeutic level might decrease thrombotic complications without increasing their bleeding risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33492445
doi: 10.1186/s13613-021-00809-5
pii: 10.1186/s13613-021-00809-5
pmc: PMC7829649
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
14Références
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Aug;7(8):e575-e582
pubmed: 32619411
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1417-1418
pubmed: 32325026
Blood. 2020 Jun 4;135(23):2033-2040
pubmed: 32339221
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Jun;46(6):1089-1098
pubmed: 32367170
Thromb Res. 2020 Jul;191:145-147
pubmed: 32291094
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Mar;43(3):304-377
pubmed: 28101605
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020 Aug;50(2):287-291
pubmed: 32445064
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):184-186
pubmed: 32330083
Blood. 2020 Jul 23;136(4):489-500
pubmed: 32492712
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1743-1746
pubmed: 32320517
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Sep;18(9):2391-2399
pubmed: 32558198
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2409-19
pubmed: 12210625
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 1;173(5):350-361
pubmed: 32422076
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Apr;18(4):844-847
pubmed: 32073213
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 May;18(5):1023-1026
pubmed: 32338827
Shock. 2018 Apr;49(4):371-384
pubmed: 28858142
J Thromb Haemost. 2020 Jul;18(7):1559-1561
pubmed: 32302453
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 19;24(1):364
pubmed: 32560658
JAMA. 2012 Jun 20;307(23):2526-33
pubmed: 22797452
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Dec 15;173(12):1030
pubmed: 33316197
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):1143-1163
pubmed: 32502594
J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2019 May;7(3):317-324
pubmed: 30477976