Algorithm for calculating high disease activity in SLE.
high disease activity status
machine learning
systemic lupus erythematosus
Journal
Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1462-0332
Titre abrégé: Rheumatology (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883501
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2021
01 09 2021
Historique:
received:
12
10
2020
revised:
19
12
2020
pubmed:
26
1
2021
medline:
5
10
2021
entrez:
25
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The ability to identify lupus patients in high disease activity status (HDAS) without knowledge of the SLEDAI could have application in selection of patients for treatment escalation or enrolment in trials. We sought to generate an algorithm that could calculate via model fitting the presence of HDAS using simple demographic and laboratory values. We examined the association of high disease activity (HDA) with demographic and laboratory parameters using prospectively collected data. An HDA visit is recorded when SLEDAI-2K ≥10. We utilized the use of combinatorial search to find algorithms to build a mathematical model predictive of HDA. Performance of each algorithm was evaluated using multi-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the final model was compared with the naïve Bayes classifier, and analysed using the confusion matrix for accuracy and misclassification rate. Data on 286 patients, followed for a median of 5.1 years were studied for a total of 5680 visits. Sixteen laboratory parameters were found to be significantly associated with HDA. A total of 216 algorithms were evaluated and the final algorithm chosen was based on seven pathology measures and three demographic variables. It has an accuracy of 88.6% and misclassification rate of 11.4%. When compared with the naïve Bayes classifier [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.663], our algorithm has a better accuracy with AUC = 0.829. This study shows that building an accurate model to calculate HDA using routinely available clinical parameters is feasible. Future studies to independently validate the algorithm will be needed to confirm its predictive performance.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The ability to identify lupus patients in high disease activity status (HDAS) without knowledge of the SLEDAI could have application in selection of patients for treatment escalation or enrolment in trials. We sought to generate an algorithm that could calculate via model fitting the presence of HDAS using simple demographic and laboratory values.
METHODS
We examined the association of high disease activity (HDA) with demographic and laboratory parameters using prospectively collected data. An HDA visit is recorded when SLEDAI-2K ≥10. We utilized the use of combinatorial search to find algorithms to build a mathematical model predictive of HDA. Performance of each algorithm was evaluated using multi-class area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the final model was compared with the naïve Bayes classifier, and analysed using the confusion matrix for accuracy and misclassification rate.
RESULTS
Data on 286 patients, followed for a median of 5.1 years were studied for a total of 5680 visits. Sixteen laboratory parameters were found to be significantly associated with HDA. A total of 216 algorithms were evaluated and the final algorithm chosen was based on seven pathology measures and three demographic variables. It has an accuracy of 88.6% and misclassification rate of 11.4%. When compared with the naïve Bayes classifier [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.663], our algorithm has a better accuracy with AUC = 0.829.
CONCLUSION
This study shows that building an accurate model to calculate HDA using routinely available clinical parameters is feasible. Future studies to independently validate the algorithm will be needed to confirm its predictive performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33493337
pii: 6119377
doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4291-4297Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.