The Role of Autosensitivity Control (ASC) in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
ADRO
ASC
CI
cochlear implantation
fitting
speech in noise
word recognition score
Journal
Audiology research
ISSN: 2039-4330
Titre abrégé: Audiol Res
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101644681
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Jan 2021
21 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
30
12
2020
revised:
11
01
2021
accepted:
12
01
2021
entrez:
26
1
2021
pubmed:
27
1
2021
medline:
27
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of the study was to examine the subjective and objective potential advantage for speech understanding in noise achieved by cochlear implant (CI) recipients when using the autosensitivity control (ASC) input signal processing in combination with the adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO). Eighteen subjects (8 females, 10 males, mean age 17.7 ± 6.7) were enrolled in a prospective open blinded comparative study between the ASC + ADRO condition vs. the ADRO alone; 16 were sequential binaural and 2 were monoaural CI recipients. All patients had been wearing their CI for at least 3 years, had no additional disabilities, had an age-appropriate receptive and expressive language. Word recognition performances in noise (at signal-to-noise ratio +5 dB HL) were significantly better in the ADRO-alone condition than in the ADRO + ASC condition. (
Identifiants
pubmed: 33494464
pii: audiolres11010003
doi: 10.3390/audiolres11010003
pmc: PMC7839018
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
22-30Références
Trends Amplif. 2008 Jun;12(2):103-12
pubmed: 18567591
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jun;32(4):533-8
pubmed: 21436756
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 28;8(11):e82263
pubmed: 24312408
ASHA Monogr. 1979 Apr;(19):1-114
pubmed: 548036
Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99
pubmed: 15035561
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1995 Sep;166:172-5
pubmed: 7668622
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Oct;22(9):623-632
pubmed: 22192607
J Am Acad Audiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;21(7):441-51; quiz 487-8
pubmed: 20807480
Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2019 Jun;136(3):169-172
pubmed: 30878509
J Am Acad Audiol. 2000 Apr;11(4):203-13
pubmed: 10783923
J Urban Health. 2014 Apr;91(2):256-71
pubmed: 24190106
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Jun;41(3):549-63
pubmed: 9638921
Trends Amplif. 2006 Dec;10(4):175-200
pubmed: 17172547
J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Jan;103(1):577-87
pubmed: 9440343
Ear Hear. 1999 Feb;20(1):60-74
pubmed: 10037066
Int J Audiol. 2009 Apr;48(4):211-21
pubmed: 19363722
Ear Hear. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):e13-23
pubmed: 22555182
J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Sep;74(3):739-43
pubmed: 6630729
J Acoust Soc Am. 1978 Apr;63(4):1186-92
pubmed: 649877
Ear Hear. 2003 Apr;24(2):157-74
pubmed: 12677112
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Feb;27(2):85-102
pubmed: 26905529
J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Mar;107(3):1637-44
pubmed: 10738817
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):65-80
pubmed: 21463562
J Am Acad Audiol. 2014 Apr;25(4):367-79
pubmed: 25126684
Hear Res. 2012 Feb;284(1-2):25-32
pubmed: 22245714
Hear Res. 1985 May;18(2):135-43
pubmed: 3840159
Ear Hear. 2007 Apr;28(2):260-75
pubmed: 17496675
J Am Acad Audiol. 2009 Jul-Aug;20(7):409-21
pubmed: 19928395
Ear Hear. 1999 Apr;20(2):104-16
pubmed: 10229512
Cochlear Implants Int. 2011 May;12(2):114-23
pubmed: 21756504
Hear Res. 2009 Apr;250(1-2):46-54
pubmed: 19450432