Development and implementation of a stroke rehabilitation integrated care pathway in an Italian no profit institution: an observational study.


Journal

European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine
ISSN: 1973-9095
Titre abrégé: Eur J Phys Rehabil Med
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101465662

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2020
Historique:
entrez: 26 1 2021
pubmed: 27 1 2021
medline: 13 4 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To standardize assessment and coordinate processes in stroke rehabilitation, an integrated care pathway (ICP) was developed in an Italian Rehabilitation and Research Institution by a knowledge-translation interdisciplinary process, from evidence-based guidelines to rehabilitation practice. The ICP was implemented in two pilot Tuscan rehabilitation Centers. The purpose of this study was to describe ICP development and assess the ICP effects on postacute stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcomes. Prospective observational study, before and after comparison. Two Tuscan inpatient rehabilitation centers. Patients accessing either centers for intensive rehabilitation after acute stroke. Two cohorts were prospectively recruited before (2015-2017) and after (2018) implementation of the pathway. The primary outcome was change in activities of daily living disability, assessed by the modified Barthel Index (mBI) from admission to discharge. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), adverse outcomes, and changes in communication ability, trunk control, pain, ambulation, bladder catheter (Y/N), bedsores (Y/N). In 2015-2017, 443 postacute stroke patients (mean age 77±11 years, 47% women), while in 2018, 84 patients (mean age 76±13 years, 61% women) were admitted to the two facilities. Comparing the 2018 vs. the 2015-17 cohort, the mean mBI increase was not substantially different (26 vs. 24 points), nor were LOS (37±18 vs. 36±16 days), adverse outcomes, discharge destination, and improvement of ambulation, pain, and communication (P>0.05). Instead, a significantly higher improvement of trunk control (trunk control test: 69.6±33.2 vs. 79.0±31.3, P=0.019), and a higher percentage of bedsore resolution (13% vs. 5%, P=0.033), and bladder catheter removal (37% vs. 17% P<0.001) were observed in 2018 vs. 2015-2017. Compared to prior practice, ICP was associated to improvement of trunk control recovery, bladder catheter removal, and bedsores resolution. Further ICP implementation on a larger scale is needed to verify improvements of stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcomes. An evidence-based stroke rehabilitation ICP was interdisciplinary developed and implemented in two rehabilitation centers of a multicenter Italian health group. ICP implementation as to inpatient intensive postacute stroke rehabilitation was associated to improved trunk control recovery, bladder catheter removal, and bedsore resolution. Further ICP implementation will allow multicenter studies and quality benchmarking.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To standardize assessment and coordinate processes in stroke rehabilitation, an integrated care pathway (ICP) was developed in an Italian Rehabilitation and Research Institution by a knowledge-translation interdisciplinary process, from evidence-based guidelines to rehabilitation practice. The ICP was implemented in two pilot Tuscan rehabilitation Centers.
AIM OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to describe ICP development and assess the ICP effects on postacute stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcomes.
DESIGN METHODS
Prospective observational study, before and after comparison.
SETTING METHODS
Two Tuscan inpatient rehabilitation centers.
POPULATION METHODS
Patients accessing either centers for intensive rehabilitation after acute stroke.
METHODS METHODS
Two cohorts were prospectively recruited before (2015-2017) and after (2018) implementation of the pathway. The primary outcome was change in activities of daily living disability, assessed by the modified Barthel Index (mBI) from admission to discharge. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), adverse outcomes, and changes in communication ability, trunk control, pain, ambulation, bladder catheter (Y/N), bedsores (Y/N).
RESULTS RESULTS
In 2015-2017, 443 postacute stroke patients (mean age 77±11 years, 47% women), while in 2018, 84 patients (mean age 76±13 years, 61% women) were admitted to the two facilities. Comparing the 2018 vs. the 2015-17 cohort, the mean mBI increase was not substantially different (26 vs. 24 points), nor were LOS (37±18 vs. 36±16 days), adverse outcomes, discharge destination, and improvement of ambulation, pain, and communication (P>0.05). Instead, a significantly higher improvement of trunk control (trunk control test: 69.6±33.2 vs. 79.0±31.3, P=0.019), and a higher percentage of bedsore resolution (13% vs. 5%, P=0.033), and bladder catheter removal (37% vs. 17% P<0.001) were observed in 2018 vs. 2015-2017.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Compared to prior practice, ICP was associated to improvement of trunk control recovery, bladder catheter removal, and bedsores resolution. Further ICP implementation on a larger scale is needed to verify improvements of stroke inpatient rehabilitation outcomes.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT CONCLUSIONS
An evidence-based stroke rehabilitation ICP was interdisciplinary developed and implemented in two rehabilitation centers of a multicenter Italian health group. ICP implementation as to inpatient intensive postacute stroke rehabilitation was associated to improved trunk control recovery, bladder catheter removal, and bedsore resolution. Further ICP implementation will allow multicenter studies and quality benchmarking.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33494558
pii: S1973-9087.20.06195-X
doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.20.06195-X
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

713-724

Auteurs

Francesca Cecchi (F)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Manuela Diverio (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Chiara Arienti (C)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Elena Corbella (E)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Federico Marrazzo (F)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Gabriele Speranza (G)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Elisabetta Del Zotto (E)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Giuliana Poggianti (G)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Francesco Gigliotti (F)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Paola Polcaro (P)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Margherita Zingoni (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Desiderio Antonioli (D)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Lucia Avila (L)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Manuele Barilli (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Emanuela Romano (E)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Lucilla Landucci Pellegrini (L)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Massimo Gambini (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Sonia Verdesca (S)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Federica Bertolucci (F)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Irene Mosca (I)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Paola Gemignani (P)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Anita Paperini (A)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy - apaperini@dongnocchi.it.

Chiara Castagnoli (C)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Ines Hochleitner (I)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Maria L Luisi (ML)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Giulia Lucidi (G)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Bahia Hakiki (B)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Maria A Gabrielli (MA)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Morena Fruzzetti (M)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Annalisa Bruzzi (A)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Enrico Bacci Bonotti (E)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Silvia Pancani (S)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Silvia Galeri (S)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.

Claudio Macchi (C)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Irene Aprile (I)

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH