Adherence to self-managed exercises for patients with persistent subacromial pain: the Ad-Shoulder feasibility study.


Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 25 09 2020
accepted: 07 01 2021
entrez: 26 1 2021
pubmed: 27 1 2021
medline: 27 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Exercise is recommended for patients with subacromial pain. It has been suggested that good exercise adherence improves clinical outcomes. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the need for behavioural frameworks to enhance adherence to home exercise programmes for patients with subacromial pain. A feasibility study with pre-post design was used. Participants aged > 18 years, with subacromial pain, who had received conservative treatment during the past 6 months, were recruited. The Ad-Shoulder intervention consisted of 1-5 individual sessions provided over 3 months and was based on 5 self-management skills, which aimed to enhance the patients' self-efficacy and adherence to self-managed exercises. The primary objectives were assessed according to predefined progression criteria: (1) the recruitment rate (10 patients enrolled within 12 weeks), (2) follow-up rate (≥ 80% on all self-reported measures), (3) objective physical activity measures (≥ 80% of participants would contribute valid data at each time point), (4) adherence with the self-managed exercises (≥ 80% of the participants would adhere to ≥ 80% of the assigned home exercise programme), (5) fidelity of the delivery of the intervention (the therapists delivered the intervention according to the protocol) and (6) adverse events (< 30% would report adverse events (including mild)). The results were reported using descriptive statistics. Eleven patients were recruited during 16 weeks. Ten patients completed the self-reported measures at baseline and week 12. Objective physical activity measures were successfully obtained for 100% (11/11) at baseline, 64% (7/11) at week six and 82% at week 12. Fifty-five percent (6/11) of the participants satisfactorily completed at least 80% of their home exercise programme. All sessions were delivered according to the protocol. None of the patients reported any adverse events. Objective physical activity data measures at baseline and week 12, follow-up, the physiotherapists' fidelity to the intervention and adverse events met our pre-specified progression criteria. Recruitment and adherence to the self-managed exercise programme were both below the anticipated level. Further intervention development is necessary to understand whether adherence to the self-managed exercises could be enhanced and additional methods of recruitment would need to be considered, including additional recruitment sites, in any planning for a future main trial. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04190836 , Registered December 9, 2019-retrospectively registered.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Exercise is recommended for patients with subacromial pain. It has been suggested that good exercise adherence improves clinical outcomes. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the need for behavioural frameworks to enhance adherence to home exercise programmes for patients with subacromial pain.
METHODS METHODS
A feasibility study with pre-post design was used. Participants aged > 18 years, with subacromial pain, who had received conservative treatment during the past 6 months, were recruited. The Ad-Shoulder intervention consisted of 1-5 individual sessions provided over 3 months and was based on 5 self-management skills, which aimed to enhance the patients' self-efficacy and adherence to self-managed exercises. The primary objectives were assessed according to predefined progression criteria: (1) the recruitment rate (10 patients enrolled within 12 weeks), (2) follow-up rate (≥ 80% on all self-reported measures), (3) objective physical activity measures (≥ 80% of participants would contribute valid data at each time point), (4) adherence with the self-managed exercises (≥ 80% of the participants would adhere to ≥ 80% of the assigned home exercise programme), (5) fidelity of the delivery of the intervention (the therapists delivered the intervention according to the protocol) and (6) adverse events (< 30% would report adverse events (including mild)). The results were reported using descriptive statistics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eleven patients were recruited during 16 weeks. Ten patients completed the self-reported measures at baseline and week 12. Objective physical activity measures were successfully obtained for 100% (11/11) at baseline, 64% (7/11) at week six and 82% at week 12. Fifty-five percent (6/11) of the participants satisfactorily completed at least 80% of their home exercise programme. All sessions were delivered according to the protocol. None of the patients reported any adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Objective physical activity data measures at baseline and week 12, follow-up, the physiotherapists' fidelity to the intervention and adverse events met our pre-specified progression criteria. Recruitment and adherence to the self-managed exercise programme were both below the anticipated level. Further intervention development is necessary to understand whether adherence to the self-managed exercises could be enhanced and additional methods of recruitment would need to be considered, including additional recruitment sites, in any planning for a future main trial.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04190836 , Registered December 9, 2019-retrospectively registered.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33494821
doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00767-6
pii: 10.1186/s40814-021-00767-6
pmc: PMC7831168
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04190836']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

31

Références

Int J Rehabil Res. 2015 Jun;38(2):95-106
pubmed: 25715230
Physiotherapy. 2014 Mar;100(1):54-60
pubmed: 23954024
J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9
pubmed: 21035130
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Oct 09;8:63
pubmed: 18844976
BMJ. 1996 Sep 7;313(7057):601-2
pubmed: 8806252
Behav Sci. 1974 Jan;19(1):1-15
pubmed: 4808738
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Dec;4(4):143-9
pubmed: 11188601
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 Dec 03;9:161
pubmed: 19055757
Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jul;30(7):686-96
pubmed: 26160149
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Dec 09;10:155
pubmed: 19995464
Br J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;52(4):269-275
pubmed: 27445360
J Pain. 2015 Feb;16(2):153-63
pubmed: 25463701
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Aug;62(8):1087-94
pubmed: 20235201
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;42(2):56-65
pubmed: 22333510
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e032081
pubmed: 31772096
Man Ther. 2016 Aug;24:65-74
pubmed: 27133031
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
Phys Ther Sport. 2020 Jan;41:34-42
pubmed: 31726386
Phys Ther. 2016 May;96(5):609-22
pubmed: 26427530
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 05;6(8):e012331
pubmed: 27496243
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998 May;27(5):331-8
pubmed: 9580892
Ann Behav Med. 2003 Aug;26(1):1-7
pubmed: 12867348
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Jan 06;10:1
pubmed: 20053272
Acta Orthop. 2014 Jun;85(3):314-22
pubmed: 24847788
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 30;17(1):375
pubmed: 28558746
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Feb;45(2):215-21
pubmed: 16263781
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008 May 15;9:68
pubmed: 18482438
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Mar 06;:
pubmed: 30843587
BMJ. 2005 Nov 12;331(7525):1124-8
pubmed: 16282408
Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):216-20
pubmed: 25090974
BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239
pubmed: 27777223
OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2015 Jul;35(3):169-77
pubmed: 26594739
Physiotherapy. 2015 Sep;101(3):279-85
pubmed: 25702093
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1(1):1
pubmed: 29611687
Shoulder Elbow. 2015 Apr;7(2):135-43
pubmed: 27582969
Phys Ther. 2016 Oct;96(10):1514-1524
pubmed: 27149962
Physiotherapy. 2013 Dec;99(4):358-62
pubmed: 23480845
Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959-64
pubmed: 8546527
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019 Dec 22;5(1):e000656
pubmed: 31908837
J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12
pubmed: 15189396
Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81
pubmed: 15163107
Physiotherapy. 2014 Mar;100(1):80-5
pubmed: 24238700
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):E492-501
pubmed: 15507789
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Jan;63(1):127-36
pubmed: 20862681
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2014 Apr;50(2):143-51
pubmed: 24429917
Musculoskeletal Care. 2018 Jun;16(2):269-277
pubmed: 29327405
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005 Jun;44(6):800-5
pubmed: 15769790
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 May;70(5):520-5
pubmed: 26573236
Percept Mot Skills. 2008 Dec;107(3):691-706
pubmed: 19235401
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(23):1428-1437
pubmed: 27707738
Am J Sports Med. 2017 Sep;45(11):2547-2554
pubmed: 28586628
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 May 15;61(5):623-32
pubmed: 19405008
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
pubmed: 10109801
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Mar;50(3):131-141
pubmed: 31726927
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 15;11(3):e0150205
pubmed: 26978655
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20;(1):CD005956
pubmed: 20091582
Eur Spine J. 2012 Dec;21(12):2539-49
pubmed: 22695701
J Physiother. 2012;58(4):249-54
pubmed: 23177227
J Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;46(8):969-975
pubmed: 30709947

Auteurs

Daniel H Major (DH)

Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. danima@oslomet.no.

Margreth Grotle (M)

Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Chris Littlewood (C)

Department of Health Professions, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.

Jens Ivar Brox (JI)

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital HF, Oslo, Norway.

Dagfinn Matre (D)

Department of Work Psychology and Physiology, National Institute of Occupational Health, Oslo, Norway.

Heidi V Gallet (HV)

Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Yngve Røe (Y)

Faculty of Health Science, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH