Quantitative proteomics-based analyses performed on pre-eclampsia samples in the 2004-2020 period: a systematic review.
Biomarkers
Cohort studies
Placenta
Plasma
Pre-eclampsia
Pregnancy
Proteome
Proteomics
Urine
Journal
Clinical proteomics
ISSN: 1542-6416
Titre abrégé: Clin Proteomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101184586
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jan 2021
26 Jan 2021
Historique:
received:
03
11
2020
accepted:
15
01
2021
entrez:
27
1
2021
pubmed:
28
1
2021
medline:
28
1
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Quantitative proteomics is an invaluable tool in biomedicine for the massive comparative analysis of protein component of complex biological samples. In the last two decades, this technique has been used to describe proteins potentially involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia as well as to identify protein biomarkers that could be used with diagnostic/prognostic purposes in pre-eclampsia. We have done a systematic review of all proteomics-based papers describing differentially expressed proteins in this disease. Searching Pubmed with the terms pre-eclampsia and proteomics, restricted to the Title/Abstract and to MeSH fields, and following manual curation of the original list, retrieved 69 original articles corresponding to the 2004-2020 period. We have only considered those results based on quantitative, unbiased proteomics studies conducted in a controlled manner on a cohort of control and pre-eclamptic individuals. The sources of biological material used were serum/plasma (n = 32), placenta (n = 23), urine (n = 9), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 2), amniotic fluid (n = 2) and decidual tissue (n = 1). Overall results were filtered based on two complementary criteria. First, we have only accounted all those proteins described in at least two (urine), three (placenta) and four (serum/plasma) independent studies. Secondly, we considered the consistency of the quantitative data, that is, inter-study agreement in the protein abundance control/pre-eclamptic ratio. The total number of differential proteins in serum/plasma (n = 559), placenta (n = 912), urine (n = 132) and other sources of biological material (n = 26), reached 1631 proteins. Data were highly complementary among studies, resulting from differences on biological sources, sampling strategies, patient stratification, quantitative proteomic analysis methods and statistical data analysis. Therefore, stringent filtering was applied to end up with a cluster of 18, 29 and 16 proteins consistently regulated in pre-eclampsia in placenta, serum/plasma and urine, respectively. The systematic collection, standardization and evaluation of the results, using diverse filtering criteria, provided a panel of 63 proteins whose levels are consistently modified in the context of pre-eclampsia.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Quantitative proteomics is an invaluable tool in biomedicine for the massive comparative analysis of protein component of complex biological samples. In the last two decades, this technique has been used to describe proteins potentially involved in the pathophysiological mechanisms of preeclampsia as well as to identify protein biomarkers that could be used with diagnostic/prognostic purposes in pre-eclampsia.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We have done a systematic review of all proteomics-based papers describing differentially expressed proteins in this disease. Searching Pubmed with the terms pre-eclampsia and proteomics, restricted to the Title/Abstract and to MeSH fields, and following manual curation of the original list, retrieved 69 original articles corresponding to the 2004-2020 period. We have only considered those results based on quantitative, unbiased proteomics studies conducted in a controlled manner on a cohort of control and pre-eclamptic individuals. The sources of biological material used were serum/plasma (n = 32), placenta (n = 23), urine (n = 9), cerebrospinal fluid (n = 2), amniotic fluid (n = 2) and decidual tissue (n = 1). Overall results were filtered based on two complementary criteria. First, we have only accounted all those proteins described in at least two (urine), three (placenta) and four (serum/plasma) independent studies. Secondly, we considered the consistency of the quantitative data, that is, inter-study agreement in the protein abundance control/pre-eclamptic ratio. The total number of differential proteins in serum/plasma (n = 559), placenta (n = 912), urine (n = 132) and other sources of biological material (n = 26), reached 1631 proteins. Data were highly complementary among studies, resulting from differences on biological sources, sampling strategies, patient stratification, quantitative proteomic analysis methods and statistical data analysis. Therefore, stringent filtering was applied to end up with a cluster of 18, 29 and 16 proteins consistently regulated in pre-eclampsia in placenta, serum/plasma and urine, respectively. The systematic collection, standardization and evaluation of the results, using diverse filtering criteria, provided a panel of 63 proteins whose levels are consistently modified in the context of pre-eclampsia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33499801
doi: 10.1186/s12014-021-09313-1
pii: 10.1186/s12014-021-09313-1
pmc: PMC7836571
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
6Subventions
Organisme : Instituto de Salud Carlos III
ID : PT17/0019/0001
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
ID : SEV2017-0712
Références
Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteom. 2017 Sep;1865(9):1207-1214
pubmed: 28705740
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 18;8(10):e78025
pubmed: 24205073
Mol Med Rep. 2019 Apr;19(4):2463-2470
pubmed: 30720087
Reprod Sci. 2008 May;15(5):457-68
pubmed: 18579854
Nat Protoc. 2011 Jul 14;6(8):1130-41
pubmed: 21799483
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2019 Aug;38(3):184-192
pubmed: 31284791
Front Immunol. 2018 Aug 08;9:1661
pubmed: 30135684
Int J Proteomics. 2012;2012:701230
pubmed: 23346402
Placenta. 2020 Mar;92:17-27
pubmed: 32056783
Hypertension. 2018 Feb;71(2):306-316
pubmed: 29229743
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017 Mar;14(3):269-276
pubmed: 28222616
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 24;12(7):e0181468
pubmed: 28738067
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002 Nov;1(11):845-67
pubmed: 12488461
Placenta. 2011 Feb;32(2):168-74
pubmed: 21145106
BMJ. 2001 Nov 24;323(7323):1213-7
pubmed: 11719411
Placenta. 2017 Jun;54:104-110
pubmed: 28117143
Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:173-92
pubmed: 20078220
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2011 Jun;5(5-6):300-10
pubmed: 21538910
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001 Mar;69(3):89-95
pubmed: 11240971
Clin Proteomics. 2014 Nov 19;11(1):40
pubmed: 25469110
Annu Rev Biochem. 2017 Jun 20;86:27-68
pubmed: 28498720
Hypertension. 2019 Nov;74(5):1136-1143
pubmed: 31495279
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Sep;42(9):1111-8
pubmed: 27279411
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;54(5):499-504
pubmed: 26522099
Hypertension. 2018 Jul;72(1):219-226
pubmed: 29844151
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015 Apr;9(3-4):295-300
pubmed: 25504339
Placenta. 2010 Feb;31(2):121-5
pubmed: 19954843
J Proteomics. 2010 Mar 10;73(5):1004-17
pubmed: 20079470
Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014 Jun;69(2):247-58
pubmed: 24343450
Clin Chem. 2007 Jan;53(1):42-52
pubmed: 17202497
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):E8468-E8477
pubmed: 28923940
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Nov 7;18(1):437
pubmed: 30404616
Trends Mol Med. 2015 Feb;21(2):88-97
pubmed: 25541377
J Proteome Res. 2007 Jan;6(1):160-70
pubmed: 17203960
Reprod Sci. 2012 Jun;19(6):650-7
pubmed: 22378858
Anal Chim Acta. 2008 Nov 23;629(1-2):158-64
pubmed: 18940332
Nat Med. 2006 Jun;12(6):642-9
pubmed: 16751767
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Nov;199(5):551.e1-16
pubmed: 18984079
J Hypertens. 2019 Jan;37(1):197-205
pubmed: 30020241
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2018 Sep;12(5):e1700165
pubmed: 29676857
J Clin Med. 2017 Jul 27;6(8):
pubmed: 28749442
Am J Pathol. 2013 Nov;183(5):1425-1436
pubmed: 24035612
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 5;14(4):e0214671
pubmed: 30951540
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 4;14(6):e0217273
pubmed: 31163045
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2012;73(3):252-9
pubmed: 22414876
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 07;5(12):e15004
pubmed: 21165148
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):845
pubmed: 12702615
Proteomics. 2011 Oct;11(20):4077-84
pubmed: 21800423
Proteomics. 2004 Feb;4(2):537-43
pubmed: 14760726
Proteomics. 2016 May;16(10):1581-9
pubmed: 27001287
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71(3):151-7
pubmed: 21335933
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):13-22
pubmed: 26735990
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116(11):1473-80
pubmed: 19663911
Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2856-69
pubmed: 21690502
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 25;20(8):
pubmed: 31027199
Hypertension. 2013 Jun;61(6):1281-8
pubmed: 23547239
J Proteomics. 2016 Oct 21;149:38-43
pubmed: 27109351
Hypertension. 2011 Mar;57(3):561-9
pubmed: 21199994
J Proteomics. 2017 Jan 6;150:109-120
pubmed: 27620695
Anal Chem. 2018 Apr 17;90(8):5405-5413
pubmed: 29608294
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 30;21(3):
pubmed: 32019243
Expert Rev Proteomics. 2014 Feb;11(1):75-89
pubmed: 24404900
Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013 Nov;12(11):3148-59
pubmed: 23897580
Nat Methods. 2010 Sep;7(9):681-5
pubmed: 20805795
J Proteome Res. 2010 Aug 6;9(8):4274-81
pubmed: 20568817
Hypertension. 2019 Aug;74(2):375-383
pubmed: 31230546
Proteomics. 2009 Jun;9(11):2929-45
pubmed: 19444803
Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2013 Dec;11(6):335-44
pubmed: 24296084
Proteomics. 2004 Dec;4(12):3665-85
pubmed: 15543535
Biology (Basel). 2014 Mar 11;3(1):205-19
pubmed: 24833342
Physiology (Bethesda). 2009 Jun;24:147-58
pubmed: 19509125
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2007;64(1):17-23
pubmed: 17199091
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep;193(3 Pt 2):957-64
pubmed: 16157094
J Cell Biochem. 2017 Dec;118(12):4341-4348
pubmed: 28430386
J Hum Hypertens. 2017 Dec;31(12):782-786
pubmed: 29115294
Proteomics Clin Appl. 2015 Jun;9(5-6):501-6
pubmed: 25644222
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Sep 12;114(37):E7786-E7795
pubmed: 28830992
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):6101-6110
pubmed: 30850528
Front Immunol. 2020 Jan 15;10:3098
pubmed: 32010144
J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:305964
pubmed: 22570525
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Sep 25;4:60
pubmed: 28993808
PLoS One. 2013 May 09;8(5):e64351
pubmed: 23671712
Eur J Mass Spectrom (Chichester). 2020 Apr;26(2):158-161
pubmed: 31291787
ACS Chem Biol. 2015 Jan 16;10(1):63-71
pubmed: 25541750
Biol Reprod. 2011 May;84(5):966-75
pubmed: 21228217
J Proteome Res. 2017 Feb 3;16(2):1050-1060
pubmed: 28030762
J Proteome Res. 2017 Dec 1;16(12):4468-4480
pubmed: 28965414
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019 May;15(5):275-289
pubmed: 30792480
J Clin Invest. 2003 Mar;111(5):649-58
pubmed: 12618519
J Cell Mol Med. 2019 Aug;23(8):5822-5826
pubmed: 31232531
J Proteomics. 2008 Aug 21;71(3):255-64
pubmed: 18603494
J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Jun;30(6):770-8
pubmed: 26028931
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;36(6):2299-306
pubmed: 26279434
J Proteome Res. 2008 May;7(5):1809-18
pubmed: 18327898
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(8):837-42
pubmed: 18607829