Effect of the macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis on methane production and rumen microbiome assemblage.

16S rRNA community profiling Asparagopsis taxiformis Feed supplementation Greenhouse gas mitigation In-vitro rumen fermentation Macroalgae Rumen microbiome

Journal

Animal microbiome
ISSN: 2524-4671
Titre abrégé: Anim Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101759457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 19 09 2018
accepted: 17 01 2019
entrez: 27 1 2021
pubmed: 12 2 2019
medline: 12 2 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent studies using batch-fermentation suggest that the red macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis has the potential to reduce methane (CH Fermentation in a semi-continuous in-vitro rumen system suggests that A. taxiformis can reduce methane production from enteric fermentation in dairy cattle by 95% when added at a 5% OM inclusion rate without any obvious negative impacts on volatile fatty acid production. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing showed that seaweed amendment effects rumen microbiome consistent with the Anna Karenina hypothesis, with increased β-diversity, over time scales of approximately 3 days. The relative abundance of methanogens in the fermentation vessels amended with A. taxiformis decreased significantly compared to control vessels, but this reduction in methanogen abundance was only significant when averaged over the course of the experiment. Alternatively, significant reductions of CH The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis during rumen fermentation makes this macroalgae a promising candidate as a biotic methane mitigation strategy for dairy cattle. But its effect in-vivo (i.e. in dairy cattle) remains to be investigated in animal trials. Furthermore, to obtain a holistic understanding of the biochemistry responsible for the significant reduction of methane, gene expression profiles of the rumen microbiome and the host animal are warranted.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Recent studies using batch-fermentation suggest that the red macroalgae Asparagopsis taxiformis has the potential to reduce methane (CH
RESULTS RESULTS
Fermentation in a semi-continuous in-vitro rumen system suggests that A. taxiformis can reduce methane production from enteric fermentation in dairy cattle by 95% when added at a 5% OM inclusion rate without any obvious negative impacts on volatile fatty acid production. High-throughput 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing showed that seaweed amendment effects rumen microbiome consistent with the Anna Karenina hypothesis, with increased β-diversity, over time scales of approximately 3 days. The relative abundance of methanogens in the fermentation vessels amended with A. taxiformis decreased significantly compared to control vessels, but this reduction in methanogen abundance was only significant when averaged over the course of the experiment. Alternatively, significant reductions of CH
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The methane reducing effect of A. taxiformis during rumen fermentation makes this macroalgae a promising candidate as a biotic methane mitigation strategy for dairy cattle. But its effect in-vivo (i.e. in dairy cattle) remains to be investigated in animal trials. Furthermore, to obtain a holistic understanding of the biochemistry responsible for the significant reduction of methane, gene expression profiles of the rumen microbiome and the host animal are warranted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33499933
doi: 10.1186/s42523-019-0004-4
pii: 10.1186/s42523-019-0004-4
pmc: PMC7803124
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

3

Subventions

Organisme : Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
ID : DE-AC02-05CH11231
Organisme : Hellman Foundation
ID : None
Organisme : US Department of Agriculture
ID : 2017-67007-25944

Références

Br J Nutr. 2016 Apr 14;115(7):1240-53
pubmed: 26879487
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
mSystems. 2015 Dec 22;1(1):
pubmed: 27822518
Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
pubmed: 1644282
Animal. 2014 Apr;8(4):580-6
pubmed: 24438753
Front Microbiol. 2014 Aug 06;5:366
pubmed: 25147543
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 26;12(4):e0174848
pubmed: 28445513
J Gen Microbiol. 1980 Aug;119(2):485-91
pubmed: 6785381
Rev Biol Trop. 2009 Dec;57(4):1271-81
pubmed: 20073352
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Sep;79(17):5112-20
pubmed: 23793624
Food Chem Toxicol. 2006 Jul;44(7):1144-50
pubmed: 16554116
Microb Ecol. 2018 Apr;75(3):811-818
pubmed: 29018917
Br J Nutr. 1977 Nov;38(3):371-84
pubmed: 588537
Br J Nutr. 2010 May;103(9):1345-53
pubmed: 19968892
Nat Prod Rep. 2012 Feb;29(2):144-222
pubmed: 22193773
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Dec;90(3):663-77
pubmed: 25195951
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 22;9(1):e85289
pubmed: 24465524
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Jan 26;8:13
pubmed: 28149512
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Oct;80(20):6403-12
pubmed: 25107965
ISME J. 2012 Aug;6(8):1621-4
pubmed: 22402401
Nat Microbiol. 2017 Aug 24;2:17121
pubmed: 28836573
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
pubmed: 16820507
Animal. 2010 Jul;4(7):1024-36
pubmed: 22444607
J Ethnopharmacol. 2008 Feb 28;116(1):187-90
pubmed: 18079077
Int Microbiol. 2001 Mar;4(1):35-40
pubmed: 11770818
J Dairy Sci. 2005 Jul;88(7):2594-600
pubmed: 15956320
Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Oct;21(4):230-4
pubmed: 7576513
Biochemistry. 1968 May;7(5):1707-13
pubmed: 4870333
J Anim Sci. 2013 Nov;91(11):5045-69
pubmed: 24045497
PeerJ. 2018 Mar 5;6:e4459
pubmed: 29527414
J Sci Food Agric. 2016 Apr;96(6):1856-66
pubmed: 26455344
J Anim Sci. 2006 Jun;84(6):1489-96
pubmed: 16699105
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674

Auteurs

Breanna Michell Roque (BM)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Charles Garrett Brooke (CG)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Joshua Ladau (J)

Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.

Tamsen Polley (T)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Lyndsey Jean Marsh (LJ)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Negeen Najafi (N)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Pramod Pandey (P)

Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Latika Singh (L)

Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Robert Kinley (R)

Agriculture and Food, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Building 145 James Cook Drive, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia.

Joan King Salwen (JK)

Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Emiley Eloe-Fadrosh (E)

Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute, 2800 Mitchell Drive, Walnut Creek, CA, 94598, USA.

Ermias Kebreab (E)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Matthias Hess (M)

Department of Animal Science, University of California, 2251 Meyer Hall, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. mhess@ucdavis.edu.

Classifications MeSH