Maternal influences on oral and faecal microbiota maturation in neonatal calves in beef and dairy production systems.

Beef calves Dairy calves Gastrointestinal tract Microbiota Neonates

Journal

Animal microbiome
ISSN: 2524-4671
Titre abrégé: Anim Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101759457

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 21 04 2020
accepted: 13 08 2020
entrez: 27 1 2021
pubmed: 28 1 2021
medline: 28 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The dam is considered an important source of microbes for the calf; consequently, the development of calf microbiota may vary with farming system due to differences between the contact the calf has with the dam. The objective of this study was to characterise the early changes in the composition of oral and faecal microbiota in beef and dairy calves (N = 10) using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbiota of calves was compared to selected anatomical niches on their dams which were likely to contribute to the vertical transfer of microbes. A total of 14,125 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified and taxonomically assigned. The oral microbiota of calves and their dams were composed of more similar microbes after the first 4 weeks of life than immediately after calving. The faecal microbiota of four-week old calves was composed of microbes which were more similar to those found in the oral microbiota of calves and adult cows than the faecal microbiota of adult cows. Specific ASVs were identified in the oral microbiota of four-week old calves that were also present in cow niches at calving, whereas very few ASVs were present in the calf faecal microbiota at four-weeks of age were present in any adult cow niche at calving. These results were observed in both beef and dairy calves. We did not observe any marked differences in the maturation of the oral and faecal microbiota between beef or dairy calves, despite dairy calves having very limited contact with their dam. This suggests the development of gastrointestinal microbiota in calves may not be affected by continued vertical transmission of microbes from the dam. Although the calf faecal microbiota changed over the first four-weeks of life, it was composed of microbes which were phylogenetically closer to those in the oral microbiota of calves and adult cows than the faeces of adult cows. There was little evidence of persistent microbial seeding of the calf faeces from anatomical niches on the cow at calving in either beef or dairy animals.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The dam is considered an important source of microbes for the calf; consequently, the development of calf microbiota may vary with farming system due to differences between the contact the calf has with the dam. The objective of this study was to characterise the early changes in the composition of oral and faecal microbiota in beef and dairy calves (N = 10) using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. The microbiota of calves was compared to selected anatomical niches on their dams which were likely to contribute to the vertical transfer of microbes.
RESULTS RESULTS
A total of 14,125 amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) were identified and taxonomically assigned. The oral microbiota of calves and their dams were composed of more similar microbes after the first 4 weeks of life than immediately after calving. The faecal microbiota of four-week old calves was composed of microbes which were more similar to those found in the oral microbiota of calves and adult cows than the faecal microbiota of adult cows. Specific ASVs were identified in the oral microbiota of four-week old calves that were also present in cow niches at calving, whereas very few ASVs were present in the calf faecal microbiota at four-weeks of age were present in any adult cow niche at calving. These results were observed in both beef and dairy calves.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We did not observe any marked differences in the maturation of the oral and faecal microbiota between beef or dairy calves, despite dairy calves having very limited contact with their dam. This suggests the development of gastrointestinal microbiota in calves may not be affected by continued vertical transmission of microbes from the dam. Although the calf faecal microbiota changed over the first four-weeks of life, it was composed of microbes which were phylogenetically closer to those in the oral microbiota of calves and adult cows than the faeces of adult cows. There was little evidence of persistent microbial seeding of the calf faeces from anatomical niches on the cow at calving in either beef or dairy animals.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33499967
doi: 10.1186/s42523-020-00049-1
pii: 10.1186/s42523-020-00049-1
pmc: PMC7807724
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

31

Références

Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 17;7:40597
pubmed: 28094284
Front Med (Lausanne). 2018 May 04;5:135
pubmed: 29780807
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0151220
pubmed: 26986467
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2008 Mar;24(1):139-53
pubmed: 18299036
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2014 Dec;20(12):1983-92
pubmed: 26356912
J Nutr. 2008 Sep;138(9):1796S-1800S
pubmed: 18716189
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0220554
pubmed: 31369600
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 03;5:16116
pubmed: 26527325
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017 Nov;30(11):1515-1528
pubmed: 28830126
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014 Mar;80(6):2021-8
pubmed: 24441166
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 30;8(4):e63157
pubmed: 23646192
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 16;12(8):e0182235
pubmed: 28813529
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):250-3
pubmed: 26828196
Microbiome. 2016 Dec 30;4(1):68
pubmed: 28034306
Front Microbiol. 2019 Jun 04;10:1124
pubmed: 31231319
Res Microbiol. 2008 Apr;159(3):187-93
pubmed: 18281199
BMC Bioinformatics. 2017 May 31;18(1):287
pubmed: 28569135
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Jul;21(7):384-393
pubmed: 32488205
mSystems. 2019 Feb 19;4(1):
pubmed: 30801029
Sci Rep. 2017 Jan 18;7:40864
pubmed: 28098248
J Vet Intern Med. 2017 May;31(3):928-939
pubmed: 28390070
Science. 2019 Sep 6;365(6457):984-985
pubmed: 31488675
ISME J. 2017 Dec;11(12):2639-2643
pubmed: 28731476
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):e0208014
pubmed: 30840624
Genome Res. 2018 Apr;28(4):561-568
pubmed: 29496731
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Jan;17(2):231-242
pubmed: 30196160
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7769):329-334
pubmed: 31367035
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Apr;99(4):2453-2467
pubmed: 26874423
Gigascience. 2013 Nov 26;2(1):16
pubmed: 24280061
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 11;8(1):10437
pubmed: 29993024
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(8):e1001631
pubmed: 23976878
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
pubmed: 20534432
J Dairy Sci. 2013 Mar;96(3):1499-510
pubmed: 23313004
Vet Rec. 2015 Dec 12;177(23):598
pubmed: 26645721
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 16;8(1):3197
pubmed: 29453364
Front Microbiol. 2019 May 16;10:1093
pubmed: 31156599
mSystems. 2019 May 7;4(3):
pubmed: 31219789
Pharmacol Res. 2013 Mar;69(1):1-10
pubmed: 22974824
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jul 1;171(7):647-654
pubmed: 28492938
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 08;7:480
pubmed: 27242672
Cell Host Microbe. 2018 Jul 11;24(1):133-145.e5
pubmed: 30001516
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018 Apr 16;84(9):
pubmed: 29475865
mSystems. 2017 Jan 17;2(1):
pubmed: 28144631
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8228-35
pubmed: 16332807
BJOG. 2020 Jan;127(2):159-169
pubmed: 31376240
Environ Microbiol. 2014 Sep;16(9):2891-904
pubmed: 24033881
J Appl Microbiol. 2014 Feb;116(2):245-57
pubmed: 24279326
mSystems. 2017 Jan 17;2(1):
pubmed: 28144630
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7776):117-121
pubmed: 31534227
Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2015 Dec;105(4):240-51
pubmed: 26607554
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e92592
pubmed: 24682221
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2019 Jan 9;85(2):
pubmed: 30367001
Front Microbiol. 2014 Nov 17;5:622
pubmed: 25452753

Auteurs

Matthew Barden (M)

Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Peter Richards-Rios (P)

Department of Veterinary Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Erika Ganda (E)

Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Luca Lenzi (L)

Department of Evolution, Ecology and Behaviour, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Richard Eccles (R)

Department of Functional and Comparative Genomics, Institute of Systems, Molecular & Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Joseph Neary (J)

Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Joanne Oultram (J)

Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Georgios Oikonomou (G)

Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection, Veterinary & Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. Georgios.Oikonomou@liverpool.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH