ASPECTS Interobserver Agreement of 100 Investigators from the TENSION Study.
Acute stroke therapy
Brain
Endovascular treatment
Interrater reliability
Ischemic stroke
Krippendorff’s α
Journal
Clinical neuroradiology
ISSN: 1869-1447
Titre abrégé: Clin Neuroradiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101526693
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
16
09
2020
accepted:
14
12
2020
pubmed:
28
1
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
27
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evaluating the extent of cerebral ischemic infarction is essential for treatment decisions and assessment of possible complications in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Patients are often triaged according to image-based early signs of infarction, defined by Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS). Our aim was to evaluate interrater reliability in a large group of readers. We retrospectively analyzed 100 investigators who independently evaluated 20 non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) scans as part of their qualification program for the TENSION study. Test cases were chosen by four neuroradiologists who had previously scored NCCT scans with ASPECTS between 0 and 8 and high interrater agreement. Percent and interrater agreements were calculated for total ASPECTS, as well as for each ASPECTS region. Percent agreements for ASPECTS ratings was 28%, with interrater agreement of 0.13 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.09-0.16), at zero tolerance allowance and 66%, with interrater agreement of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.21-0.44), at tolerance allowance set by TENSION inclusion criteria. ASPECTS region with highest level of agreement was the insular cortex (percent agreement = 96%, interrater agreement = 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97)) and with lowest level of agreement the M3 region (percent agreement = 68%, interrater agreement = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.17-0.61]). Interrater agreement reliability for total ASPECTS and study enrollment was relatively low but seems sufficient for practical application. Individual region analysis suggests that some are particularly difficult to evaluate, with varying levels of reliability. Potential impairment of the supraganglionic region must be examined carefully, particularly with respect to the decision whether or not to perform mechanical thrombectomy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33502563
doi: 10.1007/s00062-020-00988-x
pii: 10.1007/s00062-020-00988-x
pmc: PMC8648648
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1093-1100Subventions
Organisme : Horizon 2020 (European Union)
ID : 754640
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Aug 05;16:93
pubmed: 27495131
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Mar;30(1):109-114
pubmed: 30470847
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 1;372(1):11-20
pubmed: 25517348
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1019-30
pubmed: 25671798
Stroke. 2004 May;35(5):e103-5
pubmed: 15073381
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014 Jan;23(1):37-42
pubmed: 23040956
Clin Neuroradiol. 2019 Mar;29(1):1
pubmed: 30762071
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2296-306
pubmed: 25882510
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1255-60
pubmed: 21493917
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2285-95
pubmed: 25882376
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Dec;40(12):2033-2038
pubmed: 31727750
N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):708-718
pubmed: 29364767
Stroke. 2014 Mar;45(3):746-51
pubmed: 24503670
Int J Stroke. 2019 Jan;14(1):87-93
pubmed: 30156479
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):535-538
pubmed: 31152058
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):93-7
pubmed: 21088240
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Sep;22(8):1534-42
pubmed: 11559501
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1046-9
pubmed: 22322602
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 12;372(11):1009-18
pubmed: 25671797
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2005 Oct;25(10):1280-7
pubmed: 15889043
Lancet. 2000 May 13;355(9216):1670-4
pubmed: 10905241
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Nov;12(11):1069-1071
pubmed: 32024784
Circulation. 2009 Apr 28;119(16):2235-49
pubmed: 19349327
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Jun;11(6):559-562
pubmed: 30368472
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):350-355
pubmed: 31401563
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Oct;15(11):1138-47
pubmed: 27567239
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;26(11):2547-2552
pubmed: 28652060
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 4;378(1):11-21
pubmed: 29129157
Fam Med. 2005 May;37(5):360-3
pubmed: 15883903
J Res Med Sci. 2011 Oct;16(10):1326-31
pubmed: 22973327
Stroke. 2019 Dec;50(12):e344-e418
pubmed: 31662037
Stroke. 2013 Jan;44(1):234-6
pubmed: 23103490