Wing damage affects flight kinematics but not flower tracking performance in hummingbird hawkmoths.

Flight control Flower tracking Insect Macroglossum stellatarum Wing damage

Journal

The Journal of experimental biology
ISSN: 1477-9145
Titre abrégé: J Exp Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0243705

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 02 2021
Historique:
received: 24 08 2020
accepted: 13 01 2021
pubmed: 29 1 2021
medline: 10 7 2021
entrez: 28 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Wing integrity is crucial to the many insect species that spend distinct portions of their life in flight. How insects cope with the consequences of wing damage is therefore a central question when studying how robust flight performance is possible with such fragile chitinous wings. It has been shown in a variety of insect species that the loss in lift-force production resulting from wing damage is generally compensated by an increase in wing beat frequency rather than amplitude. The consequences of wing damage for flight performance, however, are less well understood, and vary considerably between species and behavioural tasks. One hypothesis reconciling the varying results is that wing damage might affect fast flight manoeuvres with high acceleration, but not slower ones. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the effect of wing damage on the manoeuvrability of hummingbird hawkmoths (

Identifiants

pubmed: 33504584
pii: jeb.236240
doi: 10.1242/jeb.236240
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing or financial interests.

Auteurs

Klara Kihlström (K)

Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden.

Brett Aiello (B)

School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Eric Warrant (E)

Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden.

Simon Sponberg (S)

School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.
School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

Anna Stöckl (A)

Lund Vision Group, Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden anna.stoeckl@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Behavioral Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), University of Würzburg, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH