Shotgun label-free proteomic and biochemical study of somatic embryos (cotyledonary and maturation stage) in
Cotyledonary stage
Embryogenesis abundant proteins
Gel-free proteomic method
Gibberellic acid
Pathogenesis-related proteins
Shotgun
Somatic embryos
Stress protein
Journal
3 Biotech
ISSN: 2190-572X
Titre abrégé: 3 Biotech
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101565857
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2021
Feb 2021
Historique:
received:
06
07
2020
accepted:
08
01
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
29
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Somatic embryogenesis is an important and wonderful biotechnological tool used to develop whole plant from a single or a group of somatic cells. The differentiated somatic cells become totipotent stem cells by drastic reprogramming of a wide range of cellular activities, leading to the acquisition of embryogenic competence. After acquiring competence, the cells pass through globular, heart, torpedo and cotyledonary stages of embryo; however, all advanced embryos do not convert into full plant, produce adventive embryos or callus instead, thus reverses the programming. This is a big limitation in propagation of many plants. Understanding and unraveling the proteins at this 'embryo to plantlet' transition stage will help to get more numbers of plants. Thus, our study was aimed at an identification of differentially abundant proteins between two important advanced stages, i.e. cotyledonary-(T1) and maturation stage (T2) of somatic embryos in
Identifiants
pubmed: 33505840
doi: 10.1007/s13205-021-02649-3
pii: 2649
pmc: PMC7817727
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
86Informations de copyright
© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2021.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThere is no conflict of interest in this article.
Références
Sci Rep. 2016 Jan 19;6:19467
pubmed: 26781930
Planta. 2016 Feb;243(2):473-88
pubmed: 26476718
Development. 1997 May;124(10):2049-62
pubmed: 9169851
Plant Cell. 2019 Jan;31(1):52-67
pubmed: 30573473
Plant Cell. 1993 Oct;5(10):1411-1423
pubmed: 12271037
Plant Biotechnol J. 2017 Jan;15(1):27-38
pubmed: 27271942
Front Plant Sci. 2017 Aug 21;8:1460
pubmed: 28871271
Methods Enzymol. 1984;105:121-6
pubmed: 6727660
Proteomics. 2018 Mar;18(5-6):e1700265
pubmed: 29369500
Protoplasma. 2004 Oct;224(1-2):33-40
pubmed: 15726807
J Plant Physiol. 2009 Jan 1;166(1):12-9
pubmed: 18565618
Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 Feb;12(2):161-73
pubmed: 24112122
Anal Biochem. 1976 May 7;72:248-54
pubmed: 942051
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 02;10(6):e0127803
pubmed: 26035435
J Exp Bot. 2014 Jan;65(1):61-74
pubmed: 24215076
Proteome Sci. 2014 Jun 26;12:37
pubmed: 25076862
J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2020 Jul 13;18(1):31
pubmed: 32661633
J Exp Bot. 2000 Jul;51(348):1189-200
pubmed: 10937694
Indian J Exp Biol. 2001 Mar;39(3):191-200
pubmed: 11495276
Planta. 2005 Dec;222(6):977-88
pubmed: 16034595
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 21;7(1):1004
pubmed: 28432333
Plant J. 2002 May;30(3):349-59
pubmed: 12000682
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 11;10(1):4501
pubmed: 32161309
Sci Rep. 2016 May 06;6:25340
pubmed: 27150014
Front Plant Sci. 2016 Jun 24;7:938
pubmed: 27446166
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):769-74
pubmed: 17406306
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 17;10(3):e0119987
pubmed: 25781987
Physiol Plant. 2019 Nov;167(3):282-301
pubmed: 30883793
Dev Cell. 2004 Sep;7(3):373-85
pubmed: 15363412
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Apr;1849(4):385-402
pubmed: 25038583
J Proteome Res. 2015 Jan 2;14(1):268-78
pubmed: 25367710
Plant Physiol. 2004 Nov;136(3):3660-9
pubmed: 15516508
Plant Cell. 2002 Aug;14(8):1737-49
pubmed: 12172019
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2014 Nov;21(5):442-9
pubmed: 25313279
Plant Pathol J. 2015 Dec;31(4):323-33
pubmed: 26676169
Physiol Plant. 2015 May;154(1):95-113
pubmed: 25200684