Costs and cost-effectiveness of the meeting centres support programme for people living with dementia and carers in Italy, Poland and the UK: The MEETINGDEM study.
cost-effectiveness
dementia and cognitive disorders
post-diagnostic support
psychosocial interventions
Journal
Health & social care in the community
ISSN: 1365-2524
Titre abrégé: Health Soc Care Community
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306359
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
revised:
08
11
2020
received:
24
02
2020
accepted:
25
11
2020
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
3
11
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We examined the costs and cost-effectiveness of the Meeting Centre Support Programme (MCSP) implemented and piloted in the UK, Poland and Italy, replicating the Dutch Meeting Centre model. Dutch Meeting Centres combine day services for people with dementia with carer support. Data were collected over 2015-2016 from MCSP and usual care (UC) participants (people with dementia-carer dyads) at baseline and 6 months. We examined participants' health and social care (HSC), and societal costs, including Meeting Centre (MC) attendances. Costs and outcomes in MCSP and UC groups were compared. Primary outcomes: Persons with dementia: quality-adjusted life years (EQ-5D-5L-derived); QOL-AD. DQoL was examined as a secondary outcome. Carers: Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were obtained by bootstrapping outcome and cost regression estimates. Eighty-three MCSP and 69 UC dyads were analysed. The 6-month cost of providing MCSP was €4,703; participants with dementia attended MC a mean of 45 times and carers 15 times. Including intervention costs, adjusted 6-month HSC costs were €5,941higher in MCSP than in UC. From the HSC perspective: in terms of QALY, the probability of cost-effectiveness was zero over willingness-to-pay (WTP) ranging from €0 to €350,000. On QOL-AD, the probability of cost-effectiveness of MCSP was 50% at WTP of €5,000 for a one-point increase. A one-point gain in the DQoL positive affect subscale had a probability of cost-effectiveness of 99% at WTP over €8,000. On SSCQ, no significant difference was found between MCSP and UC. Evidence for cost-effectiveness of MCSP was mixed but suggests that it may be cost-effective in relation to gains in dementia-specific quality of life measures. MCs offer effective tailored post-diagnostic support services to both people with dementia and carers in a context where few evidence-based alternatives to formal home-based social services may be available.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1756-1768Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Allen, C., & Beecham, J. (1993). Costing services: Ideals and reality. In A. Netten & J. Beecham (Eds.), Costing community care: Theory and practice (pp. 25-42). Ashgate.
Alzheimer Europe. (2006). Who cares? The state of dementia care in Europe. Retrieved from Luxembourg: http://www.alzheimer-europe.org/content/download/57035/363238/file/Carer%27s%20Survey%20FINAL%20VERSION.pdf
Alzheimer Europe. (2014). Dementia in Europe: National care pathways for people with dementia living at home. Retrieved from Luxembourg: http://alzheimer-europe.org/content/download/79308/491680/file/dementia%20in%20europe%20yearbook%202014.pdf
Aries, M. J. H., Le Bastard, N., Debruyne, H., Van Buggenhout, M., Nagels, G., De Deyn, P. P., & Engelborghs, S. (2010). Relation between frontal lobe symptoms and dementia severity within and across diagnostic dementia categories. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 25(11), 1186-1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2481
Brod, M., Stewart, A. L., Sands, L., & Walton, P. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: The dementia quality of life instrument (DQoL). Gerontologist, 39(1), 25-35.
Brooker, D., Evans, S., Evans, S., Bray, J., Saibene, F. L., Scorolli, C., Szcześniak, D., d'Arma, A., Urbańska, K. M., Atkinson, T., Farina, E., Rymaszewska, J., Chattat, R., Henderson, C., Rehill, A., Hendriks, I., Meiland, F., & Dröes, R. M. (2018). Evaluation of the implementation of the Meeting Centres Support Program in Italy, Poland, and the UK; exploration of the effects on people with dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(7), 883-892. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4865
Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy, 37(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6
Curtis, L. (2012). Unit costs of health and social care 2012. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
Curtis, L., & Burns, A. (2015). Unit costs of health and social care 2015. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
Dröes, R. M. (1991). In Movement; on psychosocial care for older people with dementia [In Beweging; over psychosociale hulpverlening aan demente ouderen.]. (Academic thesis). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Publ. Intro, Nijkerk.
Dröes, R. M., Breebaart, E., Meiland, F. J., Van Tilburg, W., & Mellenbergh, G. J. (2004). Effect of meeting centres support program on feelings of competence of family carers and delay of institutionalization of people with dementia. Aging & Mental Health, 8(3), 201-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860410001669732
Dröes, R. M., Meiland, F. J., Evans, S., Brooker, D., Farina, E., Szczesniak, D., Van Mierlo, L. D., Orrell, M., Rymaszewska, J., & Chattat, R. (2017). Comparison of the adaptive implementation and evaluation of the Meeting Centers Support Program for people with dementia and their family carers in Europe; study protocol of the MEETINGDEM project. BMC Geriatrics, 17(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0472-x
Dröes, R. M., Meiland, F., Schmitz, M., & van Tilburg, W. (2004). Effect of combined support for people with dementia and carers versus regular day care on behaviour and mood of persons with dementia: Results from a multi-centre implementation study. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19(7), 673. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1142
Dröes, R. M., Meiland, F. J., Schmitz, M. J., & Van Tilburg, W. (2006). Effect of the Meeting Centres Support Program on informal carers of people with dementia: Results from a multi-centre study. Aging & Mental Health, 10(2), 112-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860500310682
Dröes, R. M., Meiland, F. J. M., Schmitz, M., & Van Tilburg, W. (2011). An evaluation of the Meeting Centres Support Programme among persons with dementia and their carers. Nonpharmacological Therapies in Dementia, 2(1), 19-39.
Dröes, R. M., van der Roest, H. G., van Mierlo, L., & Meiland, F. J. (2011). Memory problems in dementia: Adaptation and coping strategies and psychosocial treatments. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11(12), 1769-1781; quiz 1782. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.11.167
Drummond, M., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Evans, S., Evans, S., Brooker, D., Henderson, C., Szcześniak, D., Atkinson, T., Bray, J., Rehill, A., Saibene, F. L., d'Arma, A., Scorolli, C., Chattat, R., Farina, E., Urbańska, K., Rymaszewska, J., Meiland, F., & Dröes, R. M. (2020). The impact of the implementation of the Dutch combined Meeting Centres Support Programme for family caregivers of people with dementia in Italy, Poland and UK. Aging & Mental Health, 24(2), 280-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1544207
Faria, R., Weatherly, H., & van den Berg, B. (2012). A review of approaches to measure and monetarily value informal care. In L. Curtis (Ed.), Unit costs of health and social care 2012. Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent.
Fields, N. L., Anderson, K. A., & Dabelko-Schoeny, H. I. (2014). The effectiveness of adult day services for older adults: A review of the literature from 2000 to 2011. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 33(2), 130. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464812443308
Galeotti, F., Giusti, A., Meduri, F., Raschetti, R., Scardetta, P., & Vanacore, N. (2013). Epidemiological data on dementia: Synthesis report. ALzheimer COoperation Valuation in Europe (ALCOVE). Retrieved from Rome: http://www.alcove-project.eu/images/synthesis-report/ALCOVE_SYNTHESIS_REPORT_WP4.pdf
Glick, H. (2007). Economic evaluation in clinical trials. Oxford University Press.
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M. F., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727-1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x
Holden, S. K., Jones, W. E., Baker, K. A., Boersma, I. M., & Kluger, B. M. (2016). Outcome measures for Parkinson's disease dementia: A systematic review. Movement Disorders Clinical Practice, 3(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.12225
Hounsome, N., Orrell, M., & Edwards, R. T. (2011). EQ-5D as a quality of life measure in people with dementia and their carers: Evidence and key issues. Value Health, 14(2), 390-399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2010.08.002
Humphries, R., Thorlby, R., Holder, H., Hall, P., & Charles, A. (2016). Social care for older people. Home truths.
Janssen, M. F., Pickard, A. S., Golicki, D., Gudex, C., Niewada, M., Scalone, L., Swinburn, P., & Busschbach, J. (2013). Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: A multi-country study. Quality of Life Research, 22(7), 1717-1727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4
Jowett, S., Bryan, S., Poller, L., van den Besselaar, A. M. H. P., van der Meer, F. J. M., Palareti, G., Shiach, C., Tripodi, A., Keown, M., Ibrahim, S., Lowe, G., Moia, M., Turpie, A. G., & Jespersen, J. (2009). The cost-effectiveness of computer-assisted anticoagulant dosage: Results from the European Action on Anticoagulation (EAA) multicentre study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 7(9), 1482-1490. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03508.x
Knapp, M., Iemmi, V., & Romeo, R. (2013). Dementia care costs and outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 28(6), 551-561. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.3864
Koopmanschap, M. A., van Exel, J. N., van den Berg, B., & Brouwer, W. B. (2008). An overview of methods and applications to value informal care in economic evaluations of healthcare. Pharmacoeconomics, 26(4), 269-280.Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=18370563
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M., & Teri, L. (2002). Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64(3), 510-519.
Mangiaracina, F., Chattat, R., Farina, E., Saibene, F. L., Gamberini, G., Brooker, D., Evans, S. C., Evans, S. B., Szcześniak, D., Urbańska, K., Rymaszewska, J., Hendriks, I., Dröes, R. M., & Meiland, F. J. (2017). Not re-inventing the wheel: The adaptive implementation of the meeting centres support programme in four European countries. Aging & Mental Health, 21(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2016.1258540
Manthorpe, J., & Moriarty, J. (2014). Examining day centre provision for older people in the UK using the Equality Act 2010: Findings of a scoping review. Health and Social Care in the Community, 22(4), 352-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12065
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2013). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. Retrieved from London: https://www.nice.org.uk/article/pmg9/resources/non-guidance-guide-to-the-methods-of-technology-appraisal-2013-pdf
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2018). Position statement on use of the EQ-5D-5L valuation set for England (updated November 2018). Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/about/what-we-do/our-programmes/nice-guidance/technology-appraisal-guidance/eq-5d-5l
Needham, C. (2012). What is happening to day centre services? Voices from frontline staff. Retrieved from Birmingham: http://www.birmingham.ac.uk/Documents/college-social-sciences/social-policy/HSMC/publications/2012/what-is-happening-to-day-centre-services-Unison-report.pdf
OECD. (2017). PPPs and exchange rates. Purchasing power parities for GDP, national currency per US dollar. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Patel, A., McCrone, P., Leese, M., Amaddeo, F., Tansella, M., Kilian, R., Angermeyer, M., Kikkert, M., Schene, A., & Knapp, M. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of adherence therapy versus health education for people with schizophrenia: Randomised controlled trial in four European countries. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 11(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-12
Szcześniak, D., Rymaszewska, J., Saibene, F. L., Lion, K., d’Arma, A., Brooker, D., Evans, S. B., Evans, S. C., Chattat, R., Scorolli, C., Meiland, F., Hendriks, I., Dröes, R. M., & Farina, E. (2021). Meeting centres support programme highly appreciated by people with dementia and carers: A European cross-country evaluation. Aging & Mental Health, 25(1), 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2019.1683814
Treasury, H. M. (2003). The green book. Appraisal and evaluation in central government. HM Treasury. Retrieved from London.
Tretteteig, S., Vatne, S., & Rokstad, A. M. M. (2016). The influence of day care centres for people with dementia on family caregivers: An integrative review of the literature. Aging & Mental Health, 20(5), 450-462. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1023765
van Hout, B., Janssen, M. F., Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Busschbach, J., Golicki, D., Lloyd, A., Scalone, L., Kind, P., & Pickard, A. S. (2012). Interim Scoring for the EQ-5D-5L: Mapping the EQ-5D-5L to EQ-5D-3L Value Sets. Value in Health, 15(5), 708-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.02.008
Van Mierlo, L. D., Chattat, R., Evans, S., Brooker, D., Saibene, F. L., Gamberini, G., Farina, E., Scorolli, C., Szcześniak, D., Urbańska, K. M., Rymaszewska, J., Dröes, R. M., & Meiland, F. J. M. (2018). Facilitators and barriers to adaptive implementation of the Meeting Centers Support Program (MCSP) in three European countries; the process evaluation within the MEETINGDEM study. International Psychogeriatrics, 30(4), 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610217001922
Vernooij-Dassen, M. J., Felling, A. J., Brummelkamp, E., Dauzenberg, M. G., van den Bos, G. A., & Grol, R. (1999). Assessment of caregiver's competence in dealing with the burden of caregiving for a dementia patient: A Short Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SSCQ) suitable for clinical practice. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 47(2), 256-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1999.tb04588.x
Wittenberg, R., Knapp, M., Hu, B., Comas-Herrera, A., King, D., Rehill, A., … Kingston, A. (2019). The costs of dementia in England. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 34(7), 1095-1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5113