How disturbance history alters invasion success: biotic legacies and regime change.
Biotic legacy
community ecology
community structure
disturbance history
disturbance regimes
invasion
reciprocal yield law
theoretical ecology
Journal
Ecology letters
ISSN: 1461-0248
Titre abrégé: Ecol Lett
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101121949
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2021
Apr 2021
Historique:
revised:
14
12
2020
received:
03
02
2020
accepted:
18
12
2020
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
19
3
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33506576
doi: 10.1111/ele.13685
pmc: PMC8048489
doi:
Types de publication
Letter
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
687-697Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation
ID : DEB-1556444
Informations de copyright
©2021 The Authors. Ecology Letters published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Ecol Lett. 2008 Jul;11(7):756-70
pubmed: 18422637
Ecol Lett. 2020 Dec;23(12):1756-1765
pubmed: 32945098
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015 Oct 1;222:81-7
pubmed: 26209864
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Apr;22(4):1361-71
pubmed: 26546049
Ecology. 2008 Mar;89(3):621-34
pubmed: 18459327
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 5;108(14):5643-8
pubmed: 21422284
New Phytol. 2007;176(2):256-273
pubmed: 17822399
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
pubmed: 17840770
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 May 11;283(1830):
pubmed: 27147101
Ecol Lett. 2014 Mar;17(3):369-79
pubmed: 24354456
Ecol Lett. 2011 Oct;14(10):973-84
pubmed: 21790934
Evolution. 2008 Feb;62(2):467-77
pubmed: 18039322
Nature. 2012 May 02;486(7401):105-8
pubmed: 22678289
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Sep;24(9):4293-4303
pubmed: 29758588
Ecol Lett. 2015 Mar;18(3):221-35
pubmed: 25522778
Ecology. 2010 Oct;91(10):2833-49
pubmed: 21058545
Sci Adv. 2018 Jul 04;4(7):eaar4313
pubmed: 29978040
Ecol Lett. 2007 Sep;10(9):809-17
pubmed: 17663714
Science. 2018 Sep 7;361(6406):
pubmed: 30190378
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Sep 3;116(36):17867-17873
pubmed: 31427510
Nature. 2004 Oct 21;431(7011):984-8
pubmed: 15496923
Theory Biosci. 2010 Jun;129(1):53-69
pubmed: 20502984
Biol Lett. 2012 Oct 23;8(5):768-71
pubmed: 22628097
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2744-7
pubmed: 4527752
Am Nat. 1993 Oct;142(4):623-45
pubmed: 19425963
Theor Popul Biol. 1985 Aug;28(1):50-79
pubmed: 4060086
Trends Ecol Evol. 2015 Jul;30(7):375-8
pubmed: 26028440
Ecology. 2014 Aug;95(8):2303-15
pubmed: 25230480
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):269-71
pubmed: 11217897