Comparison of Bone Formation After Sinus Membrane Lifting Without Graft or Using Bone Substitute "Histologic and Radiographic Evaluation".


Journal

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
ISSN: 1531-5053
Titre abrégé: J Oral Maxillofac Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8206428

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2021
Historique:
received: 15 04 2020
revised: 23 12 2020
accepted: 23 12 2020
pubmed: 29 1 2021
medline: 3 6 2021
entrez: 28 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sinus floor elevation without using autogenous bone graft or bone substitute will eliminate donor site morbidity and reduce the cost and the risk of infection. We evaluated the bone gain after sinus membrane elevation without graft or using bone substitute in the same maxilla. Dental implants were inserted simultaneously as a 1-stage procedure. In a split-mouth design, we conducted a randomized double-blinded clinical trial performing sinus lifts and simultaneous implant insertion in 10 healthy patients (n = 20). On the 1 site, we performed graft-less sinus lift (group 1) and on the other site Cerabone was used as bone substitute (group 2), respectively. The quantity and quality of bone gained in each sinus were evaluated and compared radiologically and histomorphometrically. After 6 months, the average gain of bone height was 6.21 and 9.58 mm in group 1 and 2, respectively, as measured radiologically (P < .001, P < .001). Histomorphometric examination showed significantly higher thickness of trabeculae and bone formation in group 1 (P = .003 and P = .002). However, the neovascularization was higher, but not significantly (P = .288). Radiological bone gain was similar in both groups. However, histomorphometric examination showed superior bone formation in graft-less group as compared to the Cerabone group. The blood clot seems to be an adequate filler and excellent medium for bone formation. More studies in split-mouth design are needed to compare different bone substitutes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33508239
pii: S0278-2391(20)31538-X
doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.12.040
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bone Substitutes 0
Dental Implants 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1246-1254

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2020 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Amir Zahedpasha (A)

Resident, Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Alireza Ghassemi (A)

Consultant Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon, Medical Faculty University RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.

Ali Bijani (A)

Assistant Professor, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Sina Haghanifar (S)

Professor, Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Maryam Seyed Majidi (MS)

Professor, Dental Materials Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.

Zahra Malekpour Ghorbani (ZM)

Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: ta_malekpour@yahoo.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH