Interdisciplinary Clinical Target Volume Generation for Cardiac Radioablation: Multicenter Benchmarking for the RAdiosurgery for VENtricular TAchycardia (RAVENTA) Trial.
Journal
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
ISSN: 1879-355X
Titre abrégé: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7603616
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 07 2021
01 07 2021
Historique:
received:
19
10
2020
revised:
19
01
2021
accepted:
21
01
2021
pubmed:
29
1
2021
medline:
24
9
2021
entrez:
28
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cardiac radioablation is a novel treatment option for therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) ineligible for catheter ablation. Three-dimensional clinical target volume (CTV) definition is a key step, and this complex interdisciplinary procedure includes VT-substrate identification based on electroanatomical mapping (EAM) and its transfer to the planning computed tomography (PCT). Benchmarking of this process is necessary for multicenter clinical studies such as the RAVENTA trial. For benchmarking of the RAVENTA trial, patient data (epicrisis, electrocardiogram, high-resolution EAM, contrast-enhanced cardiac computed tomography, PCT) of 3 cases were sent to 5 university centers for independent CTV generation, subsequent structure analysis, and consensus finding. VT substrates were first defined on multiple EAM screenshots/videos and manually transferred to the PCT. The generated structure characteristics were then independently analyzed (volume, localization, surface distance and conformity). After subsequent discussion, consensus structures were defined. VT substrate on the EAM showed visible variability in extent and localization for cases 1 and 2 and only minor variability for case 3. CTVs ranged from 6.7 to 22.9 cm Multicenter efficacy endpoint assessment of cardiac radioablation for therapy-refractory VT requires consistent CTV transfer methods from the EAM to the PCT. VT substrate definition and CTVs were comparable with current clinical practice. Remarkable differences regarding the degree of agreement of the CTV definition on the EAM and the PCT were noted, indicating a loss of agreement during the transfer process between EAM and PCT. Cardiac radioablation should be performed under well-defined protocols and in clinical trials with benchmarking and consensus forming.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33508373
pii: S0360-3016(21)00088-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.028
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
745-756Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.