Flow diverter stents in the treatment of recanalized intracranial aneurysms.


Journal

Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 30 1 2021
medline: 25 11 2021
entrez: 29 1 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We assessed the safety and efficacy of flow diverter stents (FDSs) in the treatment of recanalized or residual intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly. Patients whose recanalized or residual aneurysms were treated with FDSs in five tertiary hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, types of previous treatment, and clinical complications, or serious adverse events associated with FDSs, as well as the results of neurological and angiographic follow-up assessments, were recorded. Eighty-six patients (37 males) with 87 aneurysms were included in this study. Eighty (91.9%) aneurysms were in the anterior and seven (8.1%) in the posterior circulation. The initial treatment methods were the primary coiling or balloon remodeling technique in 69 (79.3%) and stent-assisted coiling in 18 (20.7%) aneurysms. The endovascular procedure was successful in all patients. Complications occurred in four patients, for a total complication rate of 4.6%. A technical complication developed in one patient (1.2%). An in-stent thrombosis treated with tirofiban was seen in two cases. Late in-stent stenosis exceeding 50% was treated with balloon angioplasty in one patient. The mean length of follow-up was 21.0 months. The first angiographic follow-up (3-6 months) revealed the complete occlusion of 74 aneurysms (85.1%). While 76 aneurysms (87.4%) were occluded at the last angiographic follow-up (mean: 26.0 months), 11 aneurysms (12.6%) were still filling. Morbimortality was zero. The drawback of endovascular treatment is aneurysmal remnants or recurrences, which is safely and durably amenable to flow diversion.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
We assessed the safety and efficacy of flow diverter stents (FDSs) in the treatment of recanalized or residual intracranial aneurysms treated endovascularly.
MATERIALS & METHODS METHODS
Patients whose recanalized or residual aneurysms were treated with FDSs in five tertiary hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' demographic data, aneurysm characteristics, types of previous treatment, and clinical complications, or serious adverse events associated with FDSs, as well as the results of neurological and angiographic follow-up assessments, were recorded.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eighty-six patients (37 males) with 87 aneurysms were included in this study. Eighty (91.9%) aneurysms were in the anterior and seven (8.1%) in the posterior circulation. The initial treatment methods were the primary coiling or balloon remodeling technique in 69 (79.3%) and stent-assisted coiling in 18 (20.7%) aneurysms. The endovascular procedure was successful in all patients. Complications occurred in four patients, for a total complication rate of 4.6%. A technical complication developed in one patient (1.2%). An in-stent thrombosis treated with tirofiban was seen in two cases. Late in-stent stenosis exceeding 50% was treated with balloon angioplasty in one patient. The mean length of follow-up was 21.0 months. The first angiographic follow-up (3-6 months) revealed the complete occlusion of 74 aneurysms (85.1%). While 76 aneurysms (87.4%) were occluded at the last angiographic follow-up (mean: 26.0 months), 11 aneurysms (12.6%) were still filling. Morbimortality was zero.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The drawback of endovascular treatment is aneurysmal remnants or recurrences, which is safely and durably amenable to flow diversion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33509011
doi: 10.1177/1591019921990507
pmc: PMC8580529
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

481-489

Références

Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2017 Jul;28(3):389-396
pubmed: 28600013
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jan 1;86(Suppl 1):S85-S94
pubmed: 31838532
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jan;7(1):44-9
pubmed: 24449174
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Dec;9(12):1208-1213
pubmed: 27888225
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Jul;8(7):692-5
pubmed: 26041098
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):852-858
pubmed: 29545248
Korean J Radiol. 2017 Sep-Oct;18(5):852-859
pubmed: 28860903
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):1043-1048
pubmed: 32467181
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Jan;12(1):62-66
pubmed: 31308197
Stroke. 2013 May;44(5):1348-53
pubmed: 23512976
Interv Neurol. 2018 Oct;7(6):359-369
pubmed: 30410513
World Neurosurg. 2016 Mar;87:317-27
pubmed: 26723288
Neurointervention. 2016 Mar;11(1):30-6
pubmed: 26958410
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E3
pubmed: 28565988
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):856-61
pubmed: 26635287
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016 May;37(5):849-55
pubmed: 26611991
J Neurointerv Surg. 2021 Mar;13(3):247-250
pubmed: 32620576
Neurosurg Rev. 2017 Oct;40(4):587-593
pubmed: 28819696
Cureus. 2016 Jan 28;8(1):e472
pubmed: 26973807
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 01;80(1):40-48
pubmed: 28362885
Neurol Res. 2014 Apr;36(4):323-31
pubmed: 24617933
Front Neurol. 2017 Feb 02;8:20
pubmed: 28210239
J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):775-780
pubmed: 27791519
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):54-8
pubmed: 24253543
Am Heart J. 2010 May;159(5):871-5
pubmed: 20435198
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2020 Apr;41(4):663-668
pubmed: 32165365
Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5 Suppl 2):301-15; discussion 315-7
pubmed: 19404109
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:229-240
pubmed: 27514698
Neurosurgery. 2019 Feb 1;84(2):421-427
pubmed: 29528449
Interv Neuroradiol. 2012 Dec;18(4):413-25
pubmed: 23217636
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E8
pubmed: 28565989
World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:e417-e424
pubmed: 29920386
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011 Jan;32(1):34-40
pubmed: 21148256
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Dec 15;108(12):1710-3
pubmed: 21906705
Neurosurgery. 2015 Nov;77(5):692-7; discission 697
pubmed: 26186670
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Jan;36(1):108-15
pubmed: 25355814
Stroke. 2009 Aug;40(8):e523-9
pubmed: 19520984

Auteurs

Erol Akgul (E)

Interventional Neuroradiology Section, Radiology Department, International School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Hasan Bilen Onan (HB)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.

Irem Islek (I)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Mehmet Tonge (M)

Neurosurgery Department, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yavuz Durmus (Y)

Radiology Department, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

Mehmet Barburoglu (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Aynur Azizova (A)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Cengiz Erol (C)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Bahattin Hakyemez (B)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey.

Serra Sencer (S)

Department of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Kubilay Aydin (K)

Department of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Anil Arat (A)

Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH