Valorization of outer tunic of the marine filter feeder Ciona intestinalis towards the production of second-generation biofuel and prebiotic oligosaccharides.

Bioethanol Cellobiose Ciona intestinalis Prebiotics Tunicate

Journal

Biotechnology for biofuels
ISSN: 1754-6834
Titre abrégé: Biotechnol Biofuels
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101316935

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 30 07 2020
accepted: 07 01 2021
entrez: 29 1 2021
pubmed: 30 1 2021
medline: 30 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

One of the sustainable development goals focuses on the biomass-based production as a replacement for fossil-based commodities. A novel feedstock with vast potentials is tunicate biomass, which can be pretreated and fermented in a similar way to lignocellulose. Ciona intestinalis is a marine filter feeder that is cultivated to produce fish feed. While the inner tissue body is used for feed production, the surrounding tunic remains as a cellulose-rich by-product, which can be further separated into outer and inner tunic. Ethanol production from organosolv-pretreated whole-tunic biomass was recently validated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of organosolv pretreated outer-tunic biomass for the production of biofuels and cellobiose that is a disaccharide with prebiotic potential. As a result, 41.4 g/L of ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, corresponding to a 90.2% theoretical yield, was achieved under the optimal conditions when the tunicate biomass was pretreated at 195 °C for 60 min at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 50. In addition, cellobiose production by enzymatic hydrolysis of the pretreated tunicate biomass was demonstrated with a maximum conversion yield of 49.7 wt. %. The utilisation of tunicate biomass offers an eco-friendly and sustainable alternative for value-added biofuels and chemicals. The cultivation of tunicate biomass in shallow coastal sea improves the quality of the water and ensures sustainable production of fish feed. Moreover, there is no competition for arable land, which leaves the latter available for food and feed production.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
One of the sustainable development goals focuses on the biomass-based production as a replacement for fossil-based commodities. A novel feedstock with vast potentials is tunicate biomass, which can be pretreated and fermented in a similar way to lignocellulose. Ciona intestinalis is a marine filter feeder that is cultivated to produce fish feed. While the inner tissue body is used for feed production, the surrounding tunic remains as a cellulose-rich by-product, which can be further separated into outer and inner tunic. Ethanol production from organosolv-pretreated whole-tunic biomass was recently validated. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential of organosolv pretreated outer-tunic biomass for the production of biofuels and cellobiose that is a disaccharide with prebiotic potential.
RESULTS RESULTS
As a result, 41.4 g/L of ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, corresponding to a 90.2% theoretical yield, was achieved under the optimal conditions when the tunicate biomass was pretreated at 195 °C for 60 min at a liquid-to-solid ratio of 50. In addition, cellobiose production by enzymatic hydrolysis of the pretreated tunicate biomass was demonstrated with a maximum conversion yield of 49.7 wt. %.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The utilisation of tunicate biomass offers an eco-friendly and sustainable alternative for value-added biofuels and chemicals. The cultivation of tunicate biomass in shallow coastal sea improves the quality of the water and ensures sustainable production of fish feed. Moreover, there is no competition for arable land, which leaves the latter available for food and feed production.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33509271
doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-01875-4
pii: 10.1186/s13068-021-01875-4
pmc: PMC7841879
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

32

Subventions

Organisme : Energimyndigheten
ID : 2016-011208
Organisme : VINNOVA
ID : 2017-02691

Références

Biochem Soc Trans. 1998 May;26(2):160-4
pubmed: 9649740
Bioresour Technol. 2014 Mar;156:123-31
pubmed: 24491295
Bioresour Technol. 2013 Jan;127:119-25
pubmed: 23131631
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 30;88(7):797-824
pubmed: 15538721
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014 Jan;98(1):231-42
pubmed: 23615741
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017 May 15;10:126
pubmed: 28515785
Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):484-9
pubmed: 16439654
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2006;46(6):459-71
pubmed: 16864139
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2019 Dec 10;12:285
pubmed: 31827613
Biotechnol Biofuels. 2018 Aug 11;11:222
pubmed: 30127852
Bioresour Technol. 2019 Dec;294:122247
pubmed: 31683456
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 2016;71(5-6):165-80
pubmed: 27049617
Front Chem. 2018 Apr 19;6:128
pubmed: 29725590
J Biol Chem. 2012 Jul 13;287(29):24807-13
pubmed: 22648408

Auteurs

Kateřina Hrůzová (K)

Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.

Leonidas Matsakas (L)

Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.

Anthi Karnaouri (A)

Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.

Fredrik Norén (F)

N-Research AB, Gränsgatan 17, 453 30, Lysekil, Sweden.

Ulrika Rova (U)

Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden.

Paul Christakopoulos (P)

Biochemical Process Engineering, Division of Chemical Engineering, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87, Luleå, Sweden. paul.christakopoulos@ltu.se.

Classifications MeSH