Grammatical category and the neural processing of phrases.


Journal

Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 01 2021
Historique:
received: 14 11 2019
accepted: 03 01 2021
entrez: 29 1 2021
pubmed: 30 1 2021
medline: 30 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The interlocking roles of lexical, syntactic and semantic processing in language comprehension has been the subject of longstanding debate. Recently, the cortical response to a frequency-tagged linguistic stimulus has been shown to track the rate of phrase and sentence, as well as syllable, presentation. This could be interpreted as evidence for the hierarchical processing of speech, or as a response to the repetition of grammatical category. To examine the extent to which hierarchical structure plays a role in language processing we recorded EEG from human participants as they listen to isochronous streams of monosyllabic words. Comparing responses to sequences in which grammatical category is strictly alternating and chosen such that two-word phrases can be grammatically constructed-cold food loud room-or is absent-rough give ill tell-showed cortical entrainment at the two-word phrase rate was only present in the grammatical condition. Thus, grammatical category repetition alone does not yield entertainment at higher level than a word. On the other hand, cortical entrainment was reduced for the mixed-phrase condition that contained two-word phrases but no grammatical category repetition-that word send less-which is not what would be expected if the measured entrainment reflected purely abstract hierarchical syntactic units. Our results support a model in which word-level grammatical category information is required to build larger units.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33510230
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81901-5
pii: 10.1038/s41598-021-81901-5
pmc: PMC7844293
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2446

Références

Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Nov 22;279(1747):4522-31
pubmed: 22977157
Nat Neurosci. 2016 Jan;19(1):158-64
pubmed: 26642090
Prog Neurobiol. 2002 Jun;67(2):85-111
pubmed: 12126657
PLoS One. 2018 May 17;13(5):e0197304
pubmed: 29771964
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Feb;17(2):89-98
pubmed: 23313359
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190307
pubmed: 31840578
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Sep 28;11:481
pubmed: 29033809
Behav Brain Sci. 2016 Jan;39:e62
pubmed: 25869618
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jun;22(6):829-34
pubmed: 21586764
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Dec;19(12):729-743
pubmed: 26564247
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Eur J Neurosci. 2018 Oct;48(7):2609-2621
pubmed: 29055058

Auteurs

Amelia Burroughs (A)

Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Nina Kazanina (N)

School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
International Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russian Federation.

Conor Houghton (C)

Department of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. conor.houghton@bristol.ac.uk.

Classifications MeSH