Accidental boosting in an individual with tetraplegia - considerations for the interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Blood pressure
Ergogenic aids
Exercise
Physical therapy/Rehabilitation
Spinal cord injury
Journal
The journal of spinal cord medicine
ISSN: 2045-7723
Titre abrégé: J Spinal Cord Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9504452
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2022
Nov 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
30
1
2021
medline:
16
11
2022
entrez:
29
1
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autonomic dysreflexia (AD), characterized by a transient increase in systolic blood pressure (BP), is experienced by individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and can be purposefully induced ('boosting') to counteract autonomic dysfunction that impairs cardiovascular responses to exercise. Herein, we demonstrate the impact of unintentional boosting observed during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in an inactive male with SCI (C5, motor-complete). On two separate occasions the individual performed a standard arm-crank CPET (1-min stages, 7W increase in resistance) following by a longer CPET (4-min stages, 12W increase in resistance), both to volitional exhaustion. The second CPET was performed to confirm the accuracy of exercise intensity prescription and verify peak exercise parameters. Immediately following the second CPET on the initial visit, the individual reported symptoms of AD, verified as a 58mmHg increase in systolic BP from baseline. Relative to the first CPET, performed only 35 min earlier, there were pronounced differences in peak exercise responses. In comparison to the longer CPET performed on the second visit without a concomitant episode of AD (thereby controlling for the type of CPET protocol administered), peak exercise outcomes were considerably elevated: power output (Δ19W), oxygen uptake (Δ3.61 ml· This case raises important considerations around the nuances of CPET in this population. In individuals susceptible to BP instability, the physiologically boosted state may explain a significant proportion of the variance in peak aerobic capacity and should be closely monitored before and after clinical CPET.
Identifiants
pubmed: 33513073
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2020.1871253
pmc: PMC9661994
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
969-974Références
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Nov;6(Suppl 1):S25
pubmed: 30613600
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1106-14
pubmed: 16876557
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Jun;41(6):1249-54
pubmed: 19461541
Sports Med. 1986 Sep-Oct;3(5):312-30
pubmed: 3529281
J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Sep;41(5):549-555
pubmed: 28784041
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):60-8
pubmed: 23739527
Int J Sports Med. 2001 Jan;22(1):2-7
pubmed: 11258636
Sports Med. 2015 Aug;45(8):1133-42
pubmed: 26009300
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Aug;55(16):937-938
pubmed: 32381500
Annu Rev Physiol. 1983;45:169-89
pubmed: 6221687
Spinal Cord. 2012 Jul;50(7):484-92
pubmed: 22391687
Clin J Sport Med. 2012 Jan;22(1):39-45
pubmed: 22222591
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1998 Aug;85(2):635-41
pubmed: 9688742
Front Physiol. 2020 Jan 08;10:1451
pubmed: 32218739
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Dec;50(12):2398-2400
pubmed: 30102676
J Spinal Cord Med. 2021 Sep;44(5):690-703
pubmed: 32043944
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015 Aug;25(4):476-85
pubmed: 25175825
Auton Neurosci. 2018 Jan;209:100-104
pubmed: 28457670
J Spinal Cord Med. 2011 Nov;34(6):535-46
pubmed: 22330108
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Apr;21(4):315-30
pubmed: 17613572