Sustainable Mortars for Application in the Cultural Heritage Field.

experimental tests lime mortar pozzolan restoration

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 02 12 2020
revised: 21 01 2021
accepted: 22 01 2021
entrez: 30 1 2021
pubmed: 31 1 2021
medline: 31 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

A large part of the world's architectural heritage is composed of masonry buildings located in seismic areas, and its vulnerability has been shown by the damage caused by the last earthquakes. Meeting the safety demands of cultural heritage buildings according to the performance-based seismic codes requires a deep knowledge of the mechanical properties of material components. Traditional mortars are among these. However, significant samples of structural mortars cannot be taken from existing masonry walls to perform mechanical tests, but tests can, alternatively, be conducted on samples realized according to traditional instructions for composition. Based on a historical study of mix proportions, this paper presents the results of a mechanical test campaign of traditional mortars. The samples were obtained combining lime and pozzolan according to the proportions derived from ancient treatises. The laboratory tests were performed taking into account three different types of limes, and a discussion involving the results presented in the literature is provided. Besides the contribution to fulfilling the lack of knowledge about the mechanical properties of traditional lime mortars, the test results are good references for on-site preparation of mortars for use in restoration. There is a focus on natural pozzolanic lime mortars, widely used in the Neapolitan area and, in general, in the whole Italian territory.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33514035
pii: ma14030598
doi: 10.3390/ma14030598
pmc: PMC7865501
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Références

Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 8;7(1):17260
pubmed: 29222495
Materials (Basel). 2020 Aug 06;13(16):
pubmed: 32781575

Auteurs

Michelina Monaco (M)

Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, Piazza Roma 21, 82100 Benevento, Italy.

Marianna Aurilio (M)

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Abbazia di San Lorenzo ad Septimum, Via S. Lorenzo, 81031 Aversa, Italy.

Anna Tafuro (A)

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Abbazia di San Lorenzo ad Septimum, Via S. Lorenzo, 81031 Aversa, Italy.

Mariateresa Guadagnuolo (M)

Department of Architecture and Industrial Design, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Abbazia di San Lorenzo ad Septimum, Via S. Lorenzo, 81031 Aversa, Italy.

Classifications MeSH