Association between plantar flexor muscle volume and dorsiflexion flexibility in healthy young males: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging studies.

Magnetic resonance imaging Range of motion Stiffness Ultrasonography

Journal

BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2052-1847
Titre abrégé: BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605016

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Jan 2021
Historique:
received: 01 05 2020
accepted: 14 01 2021
entrez: 30 1 2021
pubmed: 31 1 2021
medline: 31 1 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although joint flexibility is important for human locomotion, the determinants of joint flexibility are not fully understood. In this study, we examined the relationship between dorsiflexion flexibility and plantar flexor muscle size in healthy young males. The dorsiflexion flexibility was assessed using range of motion (ROM) and stiffness during active and passive dorsiflexion. Active ROM was defined as the maximal angle during voluntary dorsiflexion. Passive ROM was defined as the angle at the onset of pain during passive dorsiflexion. Passive stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the torque-angle curve between 10º and 20º dorsiflexion of the ankle during passive dorsiflexion. In the first study, the plantar flexor muscle volume (MV) in 92 subjects was estimated on the basis of the lower leg length and plantar flexor muscle thickness, as measured using ultrasonography. The estimated plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with active ROM (r = -0.433), passive ROM (r = -0.299), and passive stiffness (r = 0.541) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.01 for all). In the second study, the plantar flexor MV in 38 subjects was measured using magnetic resonance imaging. The plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with plantar flexor active ROM (r = -0.484), passive ROM (r = -0.383), and passive stiffness (r = 0.592) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.05 for all). These findings suggest that a larger plantar flexor MV is related to less dorsiflexion flexibility in healthy young males.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although joint flexibility is important for human locomotion, the determinants of joint flexibility are not fully understood. In this study, we examined the relationship between dorsiflexion flexibility and plantar flexor muscle size in healthy young males.
METHODS AND RESULTS RESULTS
The dorsiflexion flexibility was assessed using range of motion (ROM) and stiffness during active and passive dorsiflexion. Active ROM was defined as the maximal angle during voluntary dorsiflexion. Passive ROM was defined as the angle at the onset of pain during passive dorsiflexion. Passive stiffness was calculated as the slope of the linear portion of the torque-angle curve between 10º and 20º dorsiflexion of the ankle during passive dorsiflexion. In the first study, the plantar flexor muscle volume (MV) in 92 subjects was estimated on the basis of the lower leg length and plantar flexor muscle thickness, as measured using ultrasonography. The estimated plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with active ROM (r = -0.433), passive ROM (r = -0.299), and passive stiffness (r = 0.541) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.01 for all). In the second study, the plantar flexor MV in 38 subjects was measured using magnetic resonance imaging. The plantar flexor MV correlated significantly with plantar flexor active ROM (r = -0.484), passive ROM (r = -0.383), and passive stiffness (r = 0.592) during dorsiflexion (P = 0.05 for all).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
These findings suggest that a larger plantar flexor MV is related to less dorsiflexion flexibility in healthy young males.

Identifiants

pubmed: 33514415
doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00233-z
pii: 10.1186/s13102-021-00233-z
pmc: PMC7846987
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

8

Références

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979 Jul;61(5):756-9
pubmed: 457719
Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 28;8(1):14532
pubmed: 30266928
J Exp Biol. 2008 Oct;211(Pt 20):3266-71
pubmed: 18840660
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2016 May;36(3):206-10
pubmed: 25363847
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;38(10):632-9
pubmed: 18827325
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013 Feb;23(1):23-30
pubmed: 21564309
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Oct;52(10):2179-2188
pubmed: 32348099
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:11-6
pubmed: 7493202
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):214-219
pubmed: 28605265
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2001 Aug;85(3-4):226-32
pubmed: 11560074
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Nov;113(9):1446-55
pubmed: 22923509
Eur J Sport Sci. 2019 May;19(4):442-450
pubmed: 30360695
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Mar;88(3):811-6
pubmed: 10710372
Sci Rep. 2018 May 29;8(1):8274
pubmed: 29844513
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1492-9
pubmed: 21266930
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Aug;116(8):1519-26
pubmed: 27270900
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jul;43(7):1334-59
pubmed: 21694556
J Appl Biomech. 2011 Nov;27(4):336-44
pubmed: 21896950
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Feb;29(2):245-249
pubmed: 28265150
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004 Mar;91(2-3):264-72
pubmed: 14569399
Phys Ther Sport. 2018 Jul;32:54-58
pubmed: 29747080
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Mar;52(3):762-770
pubmed: 31524830
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Mar;42(3):674-82
pubmed: 26738629
Int J Sports Med. 2018 Feb;39(3):204-209
pubmed: 29287284
Phys Ther. 1999 Sep;79(9):827-38
pubmed: 10479783
Muscle Nerve. 2009 Feb;39(2):227-9
pubmed: 19145654
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997 Sep;12(6):383-392
pubmed: 11415747
J Gerontol. 1992 Jan;47(1):M17-21
pubmed: 1730848
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 8;14(3):e0213347
pubmed: 30849114
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Jun;28(6):737-43
pubmed: 8784761
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997 Aug;7(4):195-202
pubmed: 9241023
Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):249-55
pubmed: 11531646

Auteurs

Tadashi Suga (T)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan. t-suga@fc.ritsumei.ac.jp.

Masafumi Terada (M)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Keigo Tomoo (K)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Yuto Miyake (Y)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Takahiro Tanaka (T)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Hiromasa Ueno (H)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.
Graduate School of Health and Sport Science, Nippon Sport Science University, Fukasawa, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Research Fellow of Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Kojimachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Akinori Nagano (A)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Tadao Isaka (T)

Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, 525-8577, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan.

Classifications MeSH